Integrin adhesion complexes (IACs) have evolved over millions of years to integrate metazoan cells physically with their microenvironment. It is presumed that the simultaneous interaction of thousands of integrin receptors to binding sites in anisotropic extracellular matrix (ECM) networks enables cells to assemble a topological description of the chemical and mechanical properties of their surroundings. This information is then converted into intracellular signals that influence cell positioning, differentiation and growth, but may also influence other fundamental processes, such as protein synthesis and energy regulation. In this way, changes in the microenvironment can influence all aspects of cell phenotype. Current concepts envisage cell fate decisions being controlled by the integrated signalling output of myriad receptor clusters, but the mechanisms are not understood. Analyses of the adhesome, the complement of proteins attracted to the vicinity of IACs, are now providing insights into some of the primordial links connecting these processes. This article reviews recent advances in our understanding of the composition of IACs, the mechanisms used to transduce signals through these junctions, and the links between IACs and cell phenotype.

Integrin adhesion complexes (IACs) bridge the extracellular matrix to the actin cytoskeleton and transduce signals in response to both chemical and mechanical cues. The composition, interactions, stoichiometry, and topological organization of proteins within IACs are not fully understood. To address this gap, we used multiplexed proximity biotinylation (BioID) to generate an in situ, proximity-dependent adhesome in mouse pancreatic fibroblasts. Integration of the interactomes of 16 IAC-associated baits revealed a network of 147 proteins with 361 proximity interactions. Candidates with underappreciated roles in adhesion were identified, in addition to established IAC components. Bioinformatic analysis revealed five clusters of IAC baits that link to common groups of prey, and which therefore may represent functional modules. The five clusters, and their spatial associations, are consistent with current models of IAC interaction networks and stratification. This study provides a resource to examine proximal relationships within IACs at a global level.

No abstract

BioID, a proximity biotinylation technique, offers a valuable approach to examine the interactions occurring within protein complexes that complements traditional protein biochemical methods. BioID has various advantages that are beneficial to the study of complexes, including an ability to detect insoluble and transient proteins. We have applied BioID to the study of integrin adhesion complexes (IACs), which are located at the junction between the plasma membrane and actin cytoskeleton. The use of multiple BioID baits enables a complex‐wide, spatial annotation of IACs, which in turn facilitates the detection of novel proximal interactors and provides insights into IAC architecture. This article describes the labeling and affinity purification of IAC‐proximal proteins and their analysis by label‐free quantitative mass spectrometry. The article also outlines steps to identify high‐confidence proximity interactors, and to interrogate the topology and functional relevance of proximity interaction networks through bioinformatic analyses. © 2020 The Authors. Basic Protocol 1: Proximity biotinylation of integrin adhesion complex components Basic Protocol 2: Mass spectrometry data processing by MaxQuant and detection of high‐confidence proximal interactors Basic Protocol 3: Bioinformatic analysis and data visualization

No abstract

Integrin adhesion complexes (IACs) bridge the extracellular matrix to the actin cytoskeleton and transduce signals in response to both chemical and mechanical cues. The composition, interactions, stoichiometry and topological organisation of proteins within IACs are not fully understood. To address this gap, we used multiplexed proximity biotinylation (BioID) to generate an in situ, proximity-dependent adhesome in mouse pancreatic fibroblasts. Integration of the interactomes of 16 IACassociated baits revealed a network of 147 proteins with 361 proximity interactions.Candidates with underappreciated roles in adhesion were identified, in addition to established IAC components. Bioinformatic analysis revealed five clusters of IAC baits that link to common groups of prey, and which therefore may represent functional modules. The five clusters, and their spatial associations, are consistent with current models of IAC interaction networks and stratification. This study provides a resource to examine proximal relationships within IACs at a global level.

Endocytic recycling controls the return of internalised cargos to the plasma membrane to coordinate their positioning, availability and downstream signalling. The Rab4 and Rab11 small GTPase families regulate distinct recycling routes, broadly classified as fast recycling from early endosomes (Rab4) and slow recycling from perinuclear recycling endosomes (Rab11), and both routes handle a broad range of overlapping cargos to regulate cell behaviour. We adopted a proximity labelling approach, BioID, to identify and compare the protein complexes recruited by Rab4a, Rab11a and Rab25 (a Rab11 family member implicated in cancer aggressiveness), revealing statistically robust protein-protein interaction networks of both new and well characterised cargos and trafficking machinery in migratory cancer cells. Gene ontological analysis of these interconnected networks revealed that these endocytic recycling pathways are intrinsically connected to cell motility and cell adhesion. Using a knock sideways relocalisation approach we were further able to confirm novel links between Rab11/25 and the ESCPE-1 and retromer multiprotein sorting complexes, and identify new endocytic recycling machinery associated with Rab4, Rab11 and Rab25 that regulates cancer cell migration in 3D-matrix.

Focal adhesions (FAs) connect inner workings of the cell to the extracellular matrix to control cell adhesion, migration, and mechanosensing. Previous studies demonstrated that FAs contain three vertical layers, which connect extracellular matrix to the cytoskeleton. However, cellular processes rely on precisely-regulated FA turnover, but the molecular machineries that control FA assembly and disassembly have remained elusive. By using super-resolution iPALM microscopy, we identified two unprecedented nanoscale layers within FAs, specified by actin filaments bound to tropomyosin isoforms Tpm1.6 and Tpm3.2. The Tpm1.6-actin filaments beneath the previously identified actin-regulatory layer are critical for adhesion maturation and controlled cell motility, whereas the Tpm3.2-actin filament layer towards the bottom of FA facilitates adhesion disassembly. Mechanistically, Tpm3.2 stabilizes KANK-family proteins at adhesions, and hence targets microtubule plus-ends to FAs to catalyse their disassembly. Loss of Tpm3.2 leads to disorganized microtubule network, abnormally stable FAs, and defects in tail retraction during cell migration. Thus, FAs are composed of at least three distinct actin filament layers, each having specific roles in coupling of adhesion to the cytoskeleton, or in controlling adhesion dynamics. In a broader context, these findings demonstrate how distinct actin filament populations can co-exist and perform specific functions within a defined cellular compartment.