Bordetella pertussis colonizes the respiratory mucosa of humans, inducing an immune response seeded in the respiratory tract. An individual, once convalescent, exhibits long-term immunity to the pathogen. Current acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines do not induce the long-term immune response observed after natural infection in humans. In this study, we evaluated the durability of protection from intranasal (IN) pertussis vaccines in mice. Mice that convalesced from B. pertussis infection served as a control group. Mice were immunized with a mock vaccine (PBS), aP only, or an aP base vaccine combined with one of the following adjuvants: alum, curdlan, or purified whole glucan particle (IRI-1501). We utilized two study designs: short-term (challenged 35 days post-priming vaccination) and long-term (challenged six months post-boost). The short-term study demonstrated that immunization with IN vaccine candidates decreased bacterial burden in the respiratory tract, reduced markers of inflammation, and induced significant serum and lung antibody titers. In the long-term study, protection from bacterial challenge mirrored the results observed in the short-term challenge study. Immunization with pertussis antigens alone was surprisingly protective in both models; however, the alum and IRI-1501 adjuvants induced significant B. pertussis specific IgG antibodies in both the serum and lung, and increased numbers of anti-B. pertussis IgG secreting plasma cells in the bone marrow. Our data indicate that humoral responses induced by the IN vaccines correlated with protection, suggesting that long-term antibody responses can be protective.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is impacting the global population. This study was designed to assess the interplay of antibodies with the cytokine response in SARS-CoV-2 patients. We demonstrate that significant levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody to receptor binding domain (RBD), nucleocapsid, and spike S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 develop over the first 10 to 20 days of infection. The majority of patients produced antibodies against all three antigens (219/255 SARS-CoV-2+ patient specimens, 86%), suggesting a broad response to viral proteins. Antibody levels to SARS-CoV-2 antigens were different based on patient mortality, sex, blood type, and age. Analyses of these findings may help explain variation in immunity between these populations. To better understand the systemic immune response, we analyzed the levels of 20 cytokines by SARS-CoV-2 patients throughout infection. Cytokine analysis of SARS-CoV-2+ patients exhibited increases in proinflammatory markers (interleukin 6 [IL-6], IL-8, IL-18, and gamma interferon [IFN-γ]) and chemotactic markers (IP-10 and eotaxin) relative to healthy individuals. Patients who succumbed to infection produced decreased IL-2, IL-4, IL-12, RANTES, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), GRO-α, and MIP-1α relative to patients who survived infection. We also observed that the chemokine CXCL13 was particularly elevated in patients who succumbed to infection. CXCL13 is involved in B cell activation, germinal center development, and antibody maturation, and we observed that CXCL13 levels in blood trended with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels. Furthermore, patients who succumbed to infection produced high CXCL13 and had a higher ratio of nucleocapsid to RBD antibodies. This study provides insights into SARS-CoV-2 immunity implicating the magnitude and specificity of response in relation to patient outcomes. IMPORTANCE The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is continuing to impact the global population, and knowledge of the immune response to COVID-19 is still developing. This study assesses the interplay of different parts of the immune system during COVID-19 disease. We demonstrate that COVID-19 patients produce antibodies to three proteins of the COVID-19 virus (SARS-CoV-2) and identify many other immunological proteins that are involved during infection. The data suggest that one of these proteins (CXCL13) may be a novel biomarker for severe COVID-19 that can be readily measured in blood. This information combined with our broad-scale analysis of immune activity during COVID-19 provides new information on the immunological response throughout the course of disease and identifies a novel potential marker for assessing disease severity.

Pertussis is a respiratory disease caused by the Gram-negative pathogen, Bordetella pertussis ( Bp ). The transition from a whole cell pertussis vaccine (wP; DTP) to an acellular pertussis vaccine (aP; DTaP; Tdap) correlates with an increase in pertussis cases, despite widespread vaccine implementation and coverage, and it is now appreciated that the protection provided by aP rapidly wanes. To recapitulate the localized immunity observed from natural infection, mucosal vaccination with aP was explored using the coughing rat model of pertussis. Overall, our goal was to evaluate the route of vaccination in the coughing rat model of pertussis. Immunity induced by both oral gavage (OG) and intranasal (IN) vaccination of aP in Bp challenged rats over a nine-day infection was compared to intramuscular (IM)-wP and IM-aP immunized rats that were used as positive controls. Our data demonstrate that mucosal immunization of aP resulted in production of anti- Bp IgG antibody titers similar to IM-wP and IM-aP vaccinated controls post-challenge. IN-aP also induced anti- Bp IgA antibodies in the nasal cavity. Immunization with IM-wP, IM-aP, IN-aP, and OG-aP immunization protected against Bp induced cough, while OG-aP immunization did not protect against respiratory distress. Mucosal immunization by both IN and OG administration protected against acute inflammation and decreased bacterial burden in the lung compared to mock vaccinated challenge (MVC) rats. The data presented in this study suggests that mucosal vaccination with aP can induce a mucosal immune response and provide protection against Bp challenge. This study highlights the potential benefits and uses of the coughing rat model of pertussis; however, further questions regarding waning immunity still require additional investigation.

Bordetella pertussis (Bp) is a highly contagious bacterium that is the causative agent of whooping cough (pertussis). Currently, acellular pertussis vaccines (aP; DTaP; Tdap) are used to prevent pertussis disease. However, it is clear that the aP vaccine efficacy quickly wanes, resulting in the re-emergence of pertussis. Furthermore, recent work performed by the CDC suggest that current circulating strains are genetically distinct from strains of the past. Emergence of genetically diverging strains combined with waning aP vaccine efficacy call for re-evaluation of current animal models of pertussis. In this study, we used the rat model of pertussis to compare two genetically divergent strains Tohama 1 and D420. We intranasally challenged seven-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats with 108 viable Tohama 1 and D420 and measured the hallmark signs/symptoms of Bp infection such as neutrophilia, pulmonary inflammation, and paroxysmal cough using whole body plethysmography. Onset of cough occurred between 2-4 days after Bp challenge averaging five coughs per fifteen minutes, with peak coughing occurring at day eight post infection averaging upward of thirteen coughs per fifteen minutes. However, we observed an increase of coughs in rats infected with clinical isolate D420 through 12 days post challenge. The rats exhibited increased bronchial restriction following Bp infection. Histology of the lung and flow cytometry confirm both cellular infiltration and pulmonary inflammation. D420 infection induced higher production of anti-Bp IgM antibodies compared to Tohama 1 infection. The coughing rat model provides a way of characterizing disease manifestation differences between Bp strains.

Erratum for Wolf et al., "Intranasal immunization with acellular pertussis vaccines results in long-term immunity to Bordetella pertussis in mice." Infect Immun 89:e00285-21.