ObjectiveReducing FODMAPs (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols) can be clinically beneficial in IBS but the mechanism is incompletely understood. We aimed to detect microbial signatures that might predict response to the low FODMAP diet and assess whether microbiota compositional and functional shifts could provide insights into its mode of action.DesignWe used metagenomics to determine high-resolution taxonomic and functional profiles of the stool microbiota from IBS cases and household controls (n=56 pairs) on their usual diet. Clinical response and microbiota changes were studied in 41 pairs after 4 weeks on a low FODMAP diet.ResultsUnsupervised analysis of baseline IBS cases pre-diet identified two distinct microbiota profiles, which we refer to as IBSP (pathogenic-like) and IBSH (health-like) subtypes. IBSP microbiomes were enriched in Firmicutes and genes for amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, but depleted in Bacteroidetes species. IBSH microbiomes were similar to controls. On the low FODMAP diet, IBSH and control microbiota were unaffected, but the IBSP signature shifted towards a health-associated microbiome with an increase in Bacteroidetes (p=0.009), a decrease in Firmicutes species (p=0.004) and normalisation of primary metabolic genes. The clinical response to the low FODMAP diet was greater in IBSP subjects compared with IBSH (p=0.02).Conclusion50% of IBS cases manifested a ‘pathogenic’ gut microbial signature. This shifted towards the healthy profile on the low FODMAP diet; and IBSP cases showed an enhanced clinical responsiveness to the dietary therapy. The effectiveness of FODMAP reduction in IBSP may result from the alterations in gut microbiota and metabolites produced. Microbiota signatures could be useful as biomarkers to guide IBS treatment; and investigating IBSP species and metabolic pathways might yield insights regarding IBS pathogenic mechanisms.

Objective: Reducing FODMAPs can be clinically beneficial in IBS but the mechanism is poorly understood. We aimed to detect microbial signatures that might predict response to the low FODMAP diet and assess whether microbiota compositional and functional shifts could provide insights into its mode of action. Design: We used metagenomics to determine high-resolution taxonomic and functional profiles of the stool microbiota from IBS cases and household controls (n=56 pairs) on their usual diet. Clinical response and microbiota changes were studied in 41 pairs after 4 weeks on a low FODMAP diet. Results. Unsupervised analysis of baseline IBS cases pre-diet identified two distinct microbiota profiles, which we refer to as IBSP (pathogenic-like) and IBSH (health-like) subtypes. IBSP microbiomes were enriched in Firmicutes and genes for amino acid and carbohydrate metabolism, but depleted in Bacteroidetes species. IBSH microbiomes were similar to controls. On the low FODMAP diet IBSH and control microbiota were unaffected, but the IBSP signature shifted towards a health-associated microbiome with an increase in Bacteroidetes (p=0.009), a decrease in Firmicutes species (p=0.004) and normalization of primary metabolic genes. The clinical response to the low FODMAP diet was greater in IBSP subjects compared to IBSH (p = 0.02). Conclusion: 50% of IBS cases manifested a 'pathogenic' gut microbial signature. This shifted towards the healthy profile on the low FODMAP diet; and IBSP cases showed an enhanced clinical responsiveness to the dietary therapy. The effectiveness of FODMAP exclusion in IBSP may result from the alterations in gut microbiota and metabolites produced. Microbiota signatures could be useful as biomarkers to guide IBS treatment; and investigating IBSP species and metabolic pathways might yield insights regarding IBS pathogenic mechanisms.

No abstract

No abstract

When asked to rate their patient/carer experiences of BD there were no negative responses and the majority were positive experiences (very good 60%, excellent 26.7%). Amongst those not using BD the most frequently selected reasons were, it wasn't requested by patient/carer (76%), risk of tube blockages (51.7%), unknown nutritional content (42.6%) and infection risk (40.6%). Over 90% of respondent stated that they would like further information regarding BD most notably around nutritional adequacy, risk of blockages and patient experience. BD is being used in the UK. It appears to result in a positive patient experience and can be effective in managing GI disturbances. Despite concerns the use of BD does not appear to have resulted in significant complications. Finally, it's evident through the significant number of respondents requesting further information that dietitians potentially feel that there is a lack of evidence around the implementation of BD in the UK.

No abstract

Hip fracture care has changed significantly over the past 7 years, but poor nutritional intake remains common in this patient group, both before and after their hospital admission. This article explores the importance of improving nutritional status as part of the multidisciplinary team's efforts to enhance recovery and improve outcomes after surgery, with a specific focus on the role and evidence for using oral nutritional supplements. Strategies to optimise nutritional status and dietary intake should start in the preoperative stage and continue post-operatively in the community.