No abstract

During the last decades, transplantation has become an established tool for the treatment of terminal organ failure. Beside immunological factors, hyperlipidemia is the main problem after heart transplantation, causing rapid transplant coronary artery disease (TxCAD) and poor long-term prognosis at the beginning of the transplantation. Heart transplant recipients are now effectively treated with lipid lowering substances, of which HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors are the most potent. However, treatment with these substances correlates with an increased risk for the development of rhabdomyolysis due to therapy with the immunosuppressive cyclosporine A. Our study monitored the safety and efficacy of treatment with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin in heart transplant recipients compared to healthy controls. We investigated 10 patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy consisting of cyclosporine A, prednisone, and azathioprine who had increased concentrations of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), and 10 age-matched healthy controls. The patients were treated with 40 mg/day fluvastatin for 4 weeks and 20 mg/day for 4 additional weeks. Control individuals received 40 mg/day fluvastatin for 4 weeks only. Parameters of fluvastatin pharmacokinetics (maximum concentration of the drug (C(max.)), time (t(max.)) to reach C(max.), area under the concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0h-24h)), elimination half-life time (t(1/2))), apparent total body clearance (CL), blood cyclosporine A concentration, plasma lipids, and safety parameters were determined in both study groups at the beginning of the study and after 4 weeks. The latter were determined in the patient group also after 8 and 12 weeks. Treatment with 40 mg/day fluvastatin caused a significant decrease in total cholesterol (patients: 5.47 +/- 1.32 mmol/L vs. 7.30 +/- 1.83 mmol/L; controls: 4.69 +/- 0.64 mmol/L vs. 5.81 +/- 0.72 mmol/L), LDL-C (patients: 3.28 +/- 1.25 mmol/L vs. 5.00 +/- 1.85 mmol/L; controls: 2.58 +/- 0.63 mmol/L vs. 3.50 +/- 0.70 mmol/L), and triglycerides (patients: 1.99 +/- 0.77 mmol/L vs. 2.50 +/- 1.00 mmol/L; controls: 1.24 +/- 0.46 mmol/L vs. 1.72 +/- 0.67 mmol/L) in both study groups, whereas HDL-C was not significantly changed (patients: 1.29 +/- 0.35 mmol/L vs. 1.17 +/- 0.32 mmol/L; controls: 1.55 +/- 0.30 mmol/L vs. 1.53 +/- 0.26 mmol/L). Values of C(max.) and AUC(0h-24h) were higher in the patient group than in the control group (day 1, patients vs. controls, C(max.): 869.4 +/- 604.0 ng/mL vs. 211.9 +/- 113.9 ng/mL; AUC(0h-24h): 1948.8 +/- 1347.9 ng/mL*h vs. 549.4 +/- 247.4 ng/mL*h), whereas the corresponding value of CL was lower in the patient group (33.3 +/- 24.5 L/h vs. 107.9 +/- 95.8 L/h), and the values of t(max.) and t(1/2) showed no differences. In addition, values of C(max.) and AUC(0h-24h) after administration of 40 mg/day fluvastatin for 4 weeks in both groups were slightly higher than at the beginning, whereas the value of CL was slightly lower (day 28, patients vs. controls, C(max.): 1530.4 +/- 960.4 ng/mL vs. 254.7 +/- 199.8 ng/mL; ...

No abstract

No abstract

The pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of fluvastatin, a hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, were assessed in subjects with renal impairment and nephrotic syndrome. In a single-center, open-label, parallel-group study, a single dose of fluvastatin 40 mg was administered to subjects (8 per group, n = 48) with nephrotic syndrome (group II), healthy subjects (group I), and subjects with various degrees of renal impairment (groups III to VI). Subjects undergoing hemodialysis received two doses, one 2 days before and one just prior to hemodialysis. Blood samples to determine the PK parameters of fluvastatin were collected from 0 to 12 hours after drug intake. Noncompartmental PK evaluation and statistical analysis (descriptive and ANOVA) were performed. Safety was evaluated and vital signs were monitored. There was no difference in the PK parameters AUC0-infinity and Cmax of fluvastatin between healthy subjects and subjects with renal impairment. Fluvastatin was not removed from plasma by hemodialysis. In patients with nephrotic syndrome, the values for AUC0-infinity and Cmax were less than half of those obtained in the other groups; terminal half-life values, however, were comparable. Fluvastatin was well tolerated in all study participants. Only few adverse events of mild to moderate intensity were reported. There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory parameters in the subjects with renal impairment. Renal impairment did not affect the PK of fluvastatin after a single oral dose. Exposure to fluvastatin was lower in subjects with nephrotic syndrome. Fluvastatin also was well tolerated in subjects with nephrotic syndrome.