Bohrs Complementarity principle is one of the central concepts in quantum mechanics which restricts joint measurement for certain observables. Of course, later development shows that joint measurement could be possible for such observables with the introduction of a certain degree of unsharpness or fuzziness in the measurement. In this paper, we show that the optimal degree of unsharpness, which guarantees the joint measurement of all possible pairs of dichotomic observables, determines the degree of nonlocality in quantum mechanics as well as in more general no-signaling theories.
Bell's theorem teaches us that there are quantum correlations that can not be simulated by just shared randomness (Local Hidden variable). There are some recent results which simulate singlet correlation by using either 1 cbit or a binary (no-signaling) correlation which violate Bell's inequality maximally. But there is one more possible way to simulate quantum correlation by relaxing the condition of independency of measurement on shared randomness. Recently, MJW Hall showed that the statistics of singlet state can be generated by sacrificing measurement independence where underlying distribution of hidden variables depend on measurement direction of both parties [Phys. Rev. Lett.105 250404 (2010)].
Recently simulating the statistics of singlet state with non-quantum resources has generated much interest. Singlet state statistics can be simulated by 1 bit of classical communication without using any further nonlocal correlation. But, interestingly, singlet state statistics can also be simulated with no classical cost if a non-local box is used. In the first case, the output is completely biased whereas in second case outputs are completely random. We suggest a new (possibly) signaling correlation resource which successfully simulates singlet statistics and this result suggests a complementary relation between required classical bits and randomness in local output involved in the simulation.Our result reproduces the above two models of simulation as extreme cases. This also suggests another important feature in Leggett's non-local model and the model presented by Branciard et.al.
The amount of nonlocality in quantum theory is limited compared to that allowed in generalized no-signaling theory [Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994)]. This feature, for example, gets manifested in the amount of Bell inequality violation as well as in the degree of success probability of Hardy's (Cabello's) nonlocality argument. Physical principles like information causality and macroscopic locality have been proposed for analyzing restricted nonlocality in quantum mechanics-viz. explaining the Cirel'son bound. However, these principles are not that much successful in explaining the maximum success probability of Hardy's as well as Cabello's argument in quantum theory. Here we show that, a newly proposed physical principle namely Local Orthogonality does better by providing a tighter upper bound on the success probability for Hardy's nonlocality. This bound is relatively closer to the corresponding quantum value compared to the bounds achieved from other principles.
Knowing the dimension of an unknown physical system has practical relevance, as dimensionality plays an important role in various information theoretic tasks. In this work we show that a modified version of Hardy's argument, which reveals the contradiction of quantum theory with local realism, turns out to be useful for inspecting the minimal subsystem dimension of an unknown correlated quantum system. The use of Hardy's test in this task has a novel advantage: the subsystem dimension can be determined without knowing the detailed functioning of the experimental devices; i.e., Hardy's test suffices to be a device-independent dimension witness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.