Dendritic cells (DCs) produce type I interferons (IFNs) in greater amounts than other cells, but the mechanisms remain elusive. Here we studied the role of a transcription factor, IRF8, in DC induction of type I IFNs. Upon newcastle disease virus (NDV) infection, bone marrow-derived plasmacytoid and conventional DCs induced IFN transcripts, exhibiting two-phase kinetics. The second, amplifying phase represented an IFN feedback response that accounted for much of IFN protein production. Induction of second phase transcription required IRF8. Mouse cytomegalovirus (MCMV) and Toll-like receptor-mediated IFN induction in DCs also required IRF8. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis showed that IRF7, IRF8, and RNA polymerase II were recruited to the IFN promoters upon stimulation. Moreover, sustained RNA polymerase II recruitment to the promoters critically depended on IRF8. Together, these data indicate that IRF8 magnifies the second phase of IFN transcription in DCs by prolonging binding of basic transcription machinery to the IFN promoters, thereby playing a role in innate immunity.

Arabidopsis thaliana grown in soil amended with barley grain inocula of Penicillium simplicissimum GP17-2 or receiving root treatment with its culture filtrate (CF) exhibited clear resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst). To assess the contribution of different defense pathways, Arabidopsis genotypes implicated in salicylic acid (SA) signaling expressing the NahG transgene or carrying disruption in NPR1 (npr1), jasmonic acid (JA) signaling (jar1) and ethylene (ET) signaling (ein2) were tested. All genotypes screened were protected by GP17-2 or its CF. However, the level of protection was significantly lower in NahG and npr1 plants than it was in similarly treated wild-type plants, indicating that the SA signaling pathway makes a minor contribution to the GP17-2-mediated resistance and is insufficient for a full response. Examination of local and systemic gene expression revealed that GP17-2 and its CF modulate the expression of genes involved in both the SA and JA/ET signaling pathways. Subsequent challenge of GP17-2-colonized plants with Pst was accompanied by direct activation of SA-inducible PR-2 and PR-5 genes as well as potentiated expression of the JA-inducible Vsp gene. In contrast, CF-treated plants infected with Pst exhibited elevated expression of most defense-related genes (PR-1, PR-2, PR-5, PDF1.2 and Hel) studied. Moreover, an initial elevation of SA responses was followed by late induction of JA responses during Pst infection of induced systemic resistance (ISR)-expressing plants. In conclusion, we hypothesize the involvement of multiple defense mechanisms leading to an ISR of Arabidopsis by GP17-2.

No abstract

Although a wealth of information is available regarding resistance induced by plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), not much is known about plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF). Hence, the goal of the present research was to provide more information on this matter. In Arabidopsis thaliana L., root colonizing PGPF Penicillium sp. GP16-2 or its cell free filtrate (CF) elicited an induced systemic resistance (ISR) against infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst), leading to a restriction of pathogen growth and disease development. We demonstrate that signal transduction leading to GP16-2-mediated ISR requires responsiveness to JA and ET in a NPR1-dependent manner, while CFmediated ISR shows dispensability of SA, JA, ET and NPR1-dependent signaling (at least individually). In addition, root colonization by GP16-2 is not associated with a direct effect on expression of known defenserelated genes, but potentiates the activation of JA/ETinducible ChitB, which only becomes apparent after infection by Pst. However, CF-mediated ISR was partly associated with the direct activation of marker genes responsive to both SA and JA/ET signaling pathways and partly associated with priming, leading to activation of JA-/ET-inducible ChitB and Hel genes. These suggest that CF may contain one or more elicitors that induce resistance by way where at least SA, JA and ET may play a role in defense signaling in Arabidopsis. Therefore, defense gene changes and underlying signaling pathways induced by Penicillium sp. GP16-2 root colonization and its CF application are not the same and only partially overlap.