No abstract

No abstract

A growing body of knowledge suggests that the individual components of the post-cardiac arrest syndrome are potentially treatable.

No abstract

Many preclinical studies in critical care medicine and related disciplines rely on hypothesis-driven research in mice. The underlying premise posits that mice sufficiently emulate numerous pathophysiological alterations produced by trauma/sepsis and can serve as an experimental platform for answering clinically relevant questions. Recently the lay press severely criticized the translational relevance of mouse models in critical care medicine. A series of provocative editorials were elicited by a highly-publicized research report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS; February 2013), which identified an unrecognized gene expression profile mismatch between human and murine leukocytes following burn/trauma/endotoxemia. Based on their data, the authors concluded that mouse models of trauma/inflammation are unsuitable for studying corresponding human conditions. We believe this conclusion was not justified. In conjunction with resulting negative commentary in the popular press, it can seriously jeopardize future basic research in critical care medicine. We will address some limitations of that PNAS report to provide a framework for discussing its conclusions and attempt to present a balanced summary of strengths/weaknesses of use of mouse models. While many investigators agree that animal research is a central component for improved patient outcomes, it is important to acknowledge known limitations in clinical translation from mouse to man. The scientific community is responsible to discuss valid limitations without over-interpretation. Hopefully a balanced view of the strengths/weaknesses of using animals for trauma/endotoxemia/critical care research will not result in hasty discount of the clear need for using animals to advance treatment of critically ill patients.

No abstract

Moderate hypothermia may reduce subsequent neuronal damage after traumatic brain injury. Interleukin (IL)-6 may have a role in the pathogenesis of traumatic neuronal damage or repair. Using the enzyme-linked immunological sorbent assay (ELISA), we serially measured IL-6 levels in plasma obtained from the radial artery (systemic) and internal jugular vein (regional) in 13 cerebral trauma patients who underwent hypothermia of 32-33 degrees C ranged from 4-9 days postinjury and 10 head-injured patients who were maintained at normothermic levels (36-37 degrees C). In both patient populations, surface cooling was used since even in the normothermic group, cooling was needed to maintain patient temperature in the normothermic range. All patients were mechanically ventilated after injection of midazolam and vecuronium. The administration of these agents were continued until the end of the study. Hypothermia was typically maintained for four days, however, in some cases based upon CT findings and/or intra-cranial pressure change, the duration was prolonged. No significant differences were found between the two groups in age, gender and Glasgow Coma Scale upon admission. Further, no differences were found in terms of the classification of computed tomography findings or the occurrence of pupillary abnormalities on admission. The patients in this study had not sustained either abdominal or thoracic trauma. Before inducing hypothermia, IL-6 levels in the arterial and internal jugular venous blood exceeded the normal range. Specifically, the internal jugular plasma levels were significantly higher than those in the arterial plasma. While IL-6 levels in the normothermic group did not decrease even at 4 days postinjury, the plasma cytokine levels fell at both sites sharply after moderate hypothermia. The cytokine suppression found in the hypothermic group continued even after rewarming in these patients showing an improved clinical course, but not in those whose condition worsened. In addition to these changes in cytokine levels, the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months postinjury was significantly higher in the hypothermic group than in the normothermia group. Based on the above, this clinical study with its small patient sample size suggests the need for further prospective randomized studies to examine the role of cytokine suppression in the beneficial effects of moderate hypothermia in patients with traumatic brain injury.

SummaryThis is a guideline for the management of sepsis, developed by the Sepsis Registry Committee of The Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (JSICM) launched in March 2007. This guideline was developed on the basis of evidence-based medicine and focuses on unique treatments in Japan that have not been included in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines (SSCG), as well as treatments that are viewed differently in Japan and in Western countries. Although the methods in this guideline conform to the 2008 SSCG, the Japanese literature and the results of the Sepsis Registry Survey, which was performed twice by the Sepsis Registry Committee in intensive care units (ICUs) registered with JSICM, are also referred. This is the first and original guideline for sepsis in Japan and is expected to be properly used in daily clinical practice.This article is translated from Japanese, originally published as “The Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis” in the Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (J Jpn Soc Intensive Care Med), 2013; 20:124–73. The original work is at http://dx.doi.org/10.3918/jsicm.20.124.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40560-014-0055-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.