Prostate cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide and has strong genetic associations. This is important for the development of therapeutics for the condition, as metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is resistant to standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and has a relatively poor prognosis. We conducted a literature review on rucaparib, a poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that is currently indicated for the treatment of patients with mCRPC who harbor mutations in BRCA1/2 (homologous recombination repair [HRR] genes) and who have already tried androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapies (ARAT) and a taxane chemotherapy. We describe rucaparib’s FDA approval, which was based on the results of the single-arm, open-label, Phase II TRITON2 clinical trial, which found an objective response rate (ORR) of 43.5%, a duration of response (DOR) of over six months in length and an acceptable safety profile. Rucaparib’s dosage and clinical considerations for use were also discussed. We also compared rucaparib’s use and safety profile with Olaparib, niraparib and talazoparib, three other PARP inhibitors tested for the treatment of mCRPC. Overall, initial results show that the safety profile of all four drugs in mCRPC was relatively similar, and further testing is currently indicated for all four. Differences in their metabolism, however, also warrant further research. The clinical validity of rucaparib will be tested by the follow-up TRITON3 clinical trial, which is comparing the effect of rucaparib compared to standard therapies for mCRPC harboring BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations. Other than TRITON3, other clinical trials are testing rucaparib’s ability against other cancers (prostate or otherwise) with HRR mutations, and also the efficacy of combination therapies involving rucaparib. Finally, more research is needed to elucidate rucaparib’s effect on HRR mutations other than BRCA1/2. Advancements in understanding the genetic landscape of mCRPC will also assist in understanding rucaparib’s full therapeutic potential.
Objective: Stigma jeopardizes recovery and successful implementation of mental health services (MHS) globally. Despite cultural variation in how stigma manifests, few studies have examined how culture fundamentally impacts the concept of "personhood" in Latin America. Chile has expanded MHS, providing universal coverage for evaluation and treatment of first episode psychosis (FEP). We applied the "what matters most" (WMM) framework of stigma to identify culturally salient factors that shape or protect against stigma in urban Chile, identifying potential implications for MHS and recovery. Methods: In-depth interviews (n = 48) were conducted with MHS users with psychotic disorders (n = 18), their family members (n = 15), and community members (n = 15), from two urban regions in Chile. Interviews were coded and analyzed to identify WMM, how WMM shapes stigma, and how MHS can influence achieving WMM. Results: Traditional values emphasizing physical/social appearance, gender roles, family, and social connectedness are highly valued. Socioeconomic transitions have engendered capitalistic variations on traditional values, with increasing emphasis on professional careers for men and women, individualism, and independence. Psychotic disorders interfere with fulfillment of both traditional and capitalist values, thereby reinforcing stigma. However, MHS are seen as partially effective in enabling fulfillment of some goals, including employment, appearance, and independence, while often remaining insufficient in enabling capacity to achieve marriage and having a family. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: MHS that facilitate recovery by engaging users in services, such as pharmacotherapy, education/vocational rehabilitation, and family-centered care aligned with cultural values can mitigate stigma and facilitate recovery by enabling users to fulfill WMM.
e17014 Background: Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing can improve early prostate cancer detection. However, numerous factors can influence patients’ willingness and ability to undergo PSA testing. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study investigating the impact of various degrees of ischemic heart disease (IHD) on PSA testing. We assessed 3,822 male respondents aged 55-75 from the 2018 year of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Men were stratified according to the degree of IHD (none, history of angina pectoris (AP), history of myocardial infarction (MI), or history of neither, but with a diagnosis of IHD). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between IHD and being tested for PSA, adjusting for known cofounders. Results: Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that males with a history of IHD (no MI or AP) were more likely to have ever been PSA tested than males without IHD (p = 0.012, OR = 1.630, 95% CI 1.115-2.383), as seen in Table. Additionally, older age (p < 0.001), having a partner (vs. no partner p < 0.001), homosexual sexual orientation (vs. heterosexual orientation p = 0.007), and a history of cancer (vs. no history p < 0.001) all increased likelihood of being PSA tested. In contrast, Asian race (vs. White, p = 0.001), and being a current smoker (vs. no smoking history, p < 0.001) decreased the likelihood. Interestingly, males with a history of a symptomatic IHD (MI or AP) were not shown to be more likely to undergo PSA testing. Conclusions: Our results suggest that males with non-symptomatic IHD are more likely to be PSA tested. Males with symptomatic IHD do not seem to undergo more PSA screening, perhaps due to lower suggested life expectancy. Awareness of discrepancies in PSA testing in men with IHD should be raised. Table - Multivariable logistic regression analyses demonstrating relationships with likelihood of being PSA tested.[Table: see text]
5038 Background: Financial difficulties can lead to cancer patients delaying or deferring necessary care, resulting in later presentation with more advanced disease and worse clinical outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted assessing 488,853 prostate cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program between the years of 2010 and 2018. The association between annual household income (HHI) and diagnosis and outcomes of prostate cancer were examined using ANOVA and Chi-square analyses comparing clinical measures based on categorical HHI groupings. Results: Sociodemographic data and univariate analyses are displayed. The average age across all HHI classifications was 66.63 years. ANOVA analysis demonstrated that patients with a lower HHI had higher PSA levels upon diagnosis (12.10 vs. 10.90, 10.61, and 10.37 for <=35k, 35-55k, 55-75k, and >=75k, respectively, p<0.001). Patients with lower HHI also demonstrated lower rates of undergoing surgical treatment (31.9%, 36.9%, 37.6%, and 35.1% for <=35K, 35-55k, 55-75k, and >=75k, respectively, p<0.001) and the highest rate of disease metastasis to bone upon diagnosis (6.3%, 5.6%, 5.7%, and 5.8% for <=35k, 35-55k, 55-75k, and >=75k, respectively, p<0.001). Lastly, patients with lower HHI demonstrated progressively higher rates of cancer-specific-mortality (8.4%, 6.8%, 6.5% and 5.1% for <=35k, 35-55k, 55-75k, and >=75k, respectively, p<0.001), as well as higher overall mortality (21.2%, 18.0%, 15.0%, and 11.9% for <=35k, 35-55k, 55-75k, and >=75k, respectively, p<0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, these data suggest that prostate cancer patients with lower household income are diagnosed with more aggressive disease, tend to undergo surgery at lower rates, develop more advanced disease, and endure worse clinical outcomes than those in higher income brackets. Healthcare providers should be made aware of the clear associations between lower income and more aggressive disease at diagnosis, lower rates of surgical treatment and worse cancer-specific and overall mortality. [Table: see text]
e18558 Background: Research has shown that the COVID-19 pandemic has reduced access to cancer treatment and care for patients, especially for COVID-19 patients. Methods: We investigated the impact of COVID-19 testing on access to cancer care. A US based cross sectional study was conducted on 2,393 cancer patients using data from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between COVID-19 testing and likelihood of receiving cancer treatment or other cancer care during the pandemic. Results: Patients who reported ever being tested for COVID were on average younger (66.9 vs 69.3, p<0.001). Patients with professional school education reported higher rates of being tested than lower education levels (40.0%, p=0.032). Tested patients reported higher rates of not receiving medical care due to COVID-19 (23.3% vs. 19.1%, p=0.026). On multivariable analysis, patients who reported ever being tested for COVID-19 were less likely to receive cancer treatment (OR 0.639, 95% CI 0.489-0.834, p=0.001) or receive any other cancer medical care (OR 0.657, 95% CI 0.523-0.825, p<0.001) (Table). Conclusions: These data suggest COVID testing itself is associated with increased likelihood of cancer care disruption. As the pandemic persists, awareness of cancer care disruption, even by testing alone, should be raised.[Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.