Noninvasive liver imaging has developed rapidly resulting in increased accuracy for detecting primary and secondary hepatic tumors. Intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) was commonly considered to be the gold standard for liver staging, but the current value of IOUS is unknown in view of more sophisticated radiologic tools. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the impact of IOUS on the treatment of 149 patients undergoing liver surgery for malignant disease (colorectal metastasis, 61 patients; hepatoma, 52 patients; other hepatic malignant tumors, 36 patients). The sensitivities of computed tomography (CT), helical CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and IOUS in patients with colorectal metastases were 69.2%, 82.5%, 84.9%, and 95.2% in a segment-by-segment analysis; in patients with hepatoma their sensitivities were 76.9%, 90.9%, 93.0%, and 99.3%; and in patients with other hepatic malignancies they were 66.7%, 89.6%, 93.3%, and 98.9%, respectively. Additional malignant lesions (AMLs) were first detected by inspection and palpation in 20 patients (13.4%). In another 18 patients (12.1%) IOUS revealed at least one AML. Overall, the findings obtained only by IOUS changed the surgical strategy in 34 cases (22.8%). It was concluded that IOUS, having undergone some refinement as well, still has immense diagnostic value in hepatectomy candidates. Frequently avoiding palliative liver resection and occasionally disproving unresectability as assessed by preoperative imaging, IOUS still has a significant impact on surgical decision making and should still be considered the gold standard.
Background A periprosthetic joint infection is one of the most challenging complications associated with THA and TKA. In the diagnostic process for detecting a periprosthetic joint infection, one of the most important steps is analysis of laboratory infection biomarkers. Questions/purposes We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers procalcitonin, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and interferon a (IFN-a) as compared with conventional biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], leukocyte level) for a periprosthetic joint infection associated with revision arthroplasties. Methods We prospectively included and analyzed 84 patients (124 revision arthroplasties). The blood parameters of interest were procalcitonin, IL-6, IFN-a, leukocyte level, and CRP. Samples were taken preoperatively and on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days. The sensitivity and specificity of these biomarkers then were calculated. Results Considering the preoperative values of 84 patients (124 operations), procalcitonin, IL-6, CRP, and leukocyte level correlated with periprosthetic joint infection, whereas IFN-a did not. A procalcitonin cut-off level of 0.35 ng/mL revealed a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 37%. An IL-6 cut-off level of 2.55 pg/mL had a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 59%. Conclusions In this study procalcitonin and IL-6 were helpful for detecting periprosthetic joint infections in revision arthroplasties, although CRP generally was superior. Procalcitonin and IL-6 may be considered adjuvant tests when the diagnosis of a periprosthetic joint infection is in doubt. This study showed, in addition to conventional biomarkers such as CRP and leukocyte level, procalcitonin and IL-6 were helpful for detecting infections associated with revision arthroplasties.
The results of the present single-center study show that, following distal radial fracture fixation, wrist arthritis may affect the patient's subjective well-being, as documented with the Short Form-36, without influencing the functional outcome. Well-designed longitudinal clinical trials are needed to confirm the findings of the present investigation in terms of quality of life after surgical treatment of intra-articular distal radial fractures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.