We report on a search for supermassive nuclei in nature with masses up to 107 amu. Such exotic nuclei might consist, for example, of stable strange matter, which coinprises a mixture of up, down, and strange quarks, or of relic particles from the early Universe. The experiments are based on Rutherford backscattering of heavy ions, preferably 238U, from various target samples. The measured parameters of a detected particle are its timeof-flight, scattering angle, and specific ionization. From this information the mass of the target nucleus can be inferred. Upper limits for the abundance of strange supermassive nuclei with masses A ~-4-102 to 107 amu relative to the number of nucleons were found to be in the range 10 -11 to 10 -is. For the narrower mass range A ,-~103 to i04 amu the limit is 2.10 -17. 14.80.Pb; 29.40.Jz In a previous letter [1] we reported on the results of a search for supermassive nuclei in iron meteorites and some terrestrial samples by Rutherford backscattering of uranium and lead nuclei. No indication of the presence of supermassive isotopes was,observed. Based on these data upper limits for the abundance of two potential heavy-mass candidates were inferred, viz. for strange matter [2-5] consisting of up-, down-, and strangequarks and for relic particles from the early Universe [6-8]: For strange matter with masses 103 to 107 amu the abundance (relative to the number of nucleons) is less than 10-lO to 10-14, respectively; for relic particles within the same interval of masses the upper limit is 10-21. The limits for the abundance of strange matter are close to its expected concentration in the Earth's crust which was estimated by De Rfijula and Glashow [5] who assumed that strange nuggets produced in collisions of neutron stars can reach the Earth. PACS:In order to improve the experimental limits one can think of at least two possibilities: an increase of the beam intensity used for irradiation of the samples and, more importantly, the use of target samples chemically enriched in strange-matter content. In our more recent experiments, the results of which we present here, both possibilities were realized.The most efficient way of obtaining an enriched sample is to use a target composed of unstable elements (for example technetium, praseodymium, or transuranic elements). There is no reason to expect the stability of strange matter to be correlated with the stability of normal nuclei. Thus, presuming strange matter to be stable, it should exist with all atomic numbers of the periodic table (except possibly for the smallest ones [3~) and notably with those of unstable elements. In this case, strange matter can be chemically extracted from a large amount of bulk material that contains or did contain unstable elements.In 1971, D.C. Hoffman and coworkers [9] published the detection of primordial plutonium in nature. From an initial mineral sample of 85 kg containing about 8.5 kg of bastnasite, a rare earth fluocarbonate mineral, the authors reported to have extracted ,~+0.3 107 atoms "r 0.7 " of ...
This paper explores the dynamics of (dis)trust among experts, journalists, and audiences through the case study of an inaccurate exit poll aired on a leading Israeli television channel. It combines empirical data from the Israeli April 2019 elections with a conceptual view of exit polls as both sources of information and national rituals to address public discourse on the polls and its underlying suspicions. A multi-method approach yielded a corpus consisting of focus groups with citizens, in-depth semi-structured interviews with journalists, pollsters and experts, and qualitative textual analysis of news reports. Using inductive-qualitative analysis, we identified three types of public narratives, each casting blame for the erroneous exit poll projection on a different type of actor. The statistical and biased-media narratives tally with declining trust in the news media and assume misbehavior by pollsters and news creators respectively. The deception narrative, on the other hand, suggests that right-wing voters systematically sabotaged the exit poll projections. By extending trust beyond journalistic information, this narrative foregrounds the cultural meaning of election night rituals. Taken together, the narratives found in this study delineate (dis)trust as an interplay of active participants in the creation, reception, and interpretation of news. Our findings thus touch upon key attitudes towards both media and democracy and have implications for further studies on collective rituals and information evaluations in an era of eroding trust.
In orienting themselves to the future, people form expectations not only on what will happen but also on how they will feel about possible future occurrences. So far, such affective forecasting—the prediction of future feelings—has been studied mainly from a psychological perspective. This study aims to show the importance of a socio-communicative perspective for understanding the predictors, manifestations, and consequences of affective forecasting, especially when collective futures are at stake. Using the case study of the 2019–2021 Israeli elections and a combination of a 12-wave survey and 25 focus groups, we show how political affective forecasts are associated with socio-communicative factors, are used in social interactions, and have consequences for political polarization and participation. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of our findings for future research on affective forecasting in communication studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.