The intervention of clinical pharmacists allowed correcting 378 ME in 25.8% of the cohort before they caused harm. Clinicians, pharmacists and other health care providers should therefore work together to improve patients' safety, in particular in high-risk patients such as diabetic patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, economic, and organizational impact of clinical pharmacist services added to an adult orthopedic and trauma surgery unit in a university hospital.Methods: This was a prospective, observational study performed from January to February 2017. All pharmacists' interventions were documented, and their clinical, economic, and organizational impact and the probability of adverse drug events (ADEs) were assessed using the clinical, economic and organizational scale three-dimensional scale. An expert panel composed of three clinical pharmacists, one surgeon and one anesthetist classified the pharmacist intervention. The potential clinical impact was determined through a consensus by the expert panel. Cost avoidance was calculated for serious ADEs with a major impact by avoiding an additional cost of €4912 per event and taking into account the probability of ADE occurrence. Results:The pharmacists performed 1014 interventions for 28 days with a 95.3% acceptance rate by prescribers. Thirty-nine interventions were rated to have a major clinical impact (3.8%). The organizational impact was estimated favorable for 856 (84.4%) pharmacist interventions. Cost avoidance was estimated at €24,364, and the indirect costs benefit was estimated at €11,864 during the study. The cost-benefit ratio of the clinical pharmacist intervention was €1.94 in savings for every €1 invested.Conclusions: Clinical pharmacist services in an orthopedic and trauma surgery department have the potential to improve patient outcomes and avoid healthcare costs. Furthermore, the presence of a pharmacist in surgical units allows for communication between the unit and the pharmacy, which produces better fluidity and improves the quality of care.

Objective: First, the aim of the study was to assess the prevalence, characteristics, and severity of unintended medication discrepancies (UMDs) and medication errors (MEs) at admission and discharge of hospitalization. Second, the aim of the study was to identify clinical and hospitalization factors associated with risk of UMDs as well as characteristics of the medication reconciliation process associated with UMDs detection.

Prognostic and epidemiologic study, level III.