To study the efficacy of lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 .Methods: Critically ill adults with COVID-19 were randomized to receive lopinavir-ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, combination therapy of lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine or no antiviral therapy (control). The primary endpoint was an ordinal scale of organ support-free days. Analyses used a Bayesian cumulative logistic model and expressed treatment effects as an adjusted odds ratio (OR) where an OR > 1 is favorable. Results:We randomized 694 patients to receive lopinavir-ritonavir (n = 255), hydroxychloroquine (n = 50), combination therapy (n = 27) or control (n = 362). The median organ support-free days among patients in lopinavir-ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, and combination therapy groups was 4 (-1 to 15), 0 (-1 to 9) and-1 (-1 to 7), respectively,

We describe four secondary fungal infections caused by Mucorales species in COVID-19 patients. Three COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) occurred in ICU, one outside ICU. All were men aged > 50 years, three died. Clinical presentations included pulmonary, rhino-orbital cerebral and disseminated infection. Infections occurred in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. CAM is an emerging disease and our observations underscore the need to be aware of invasive mucormycosis, including in COVID-19 patients without (poorly controlled) diabetes mellitus and outside ICU.

Purpose of reviewTo summarize the incidence, features, pathogenesis, risk factors, and evidence-based therapies of prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) acquired weakness (ICU-AW). We aim to provide an updated overview on aspects of poor physical recovery following critical illness.Recent findingsNew physical problems after ICU survival, such as muscle weakness, weakened condition, and reduced exercise capacity, are the most frequently encountered limitations of patients with postintensive care syndrome. Disabilities may persist for months to years and frequently do not fully recover. Hormonal and mitochondrial disturbances, impaired muscle regeneration due to injured satellite cells and epigenetic differences may be involved in sustained ICU-AW. Although demographics and ICU treatment factors appear essential determinants for physical recovery, pre-ICU health status is also crucial. Currently, no effective treatments are available. Early mobilization in the ICU may improve physical outcomes at ICU-discharge, but there is no evidence for benefit on long-term physical recovery.SummaryImpaired physical recovery is observed frequently among ICU survivors. The pre-ICU health status, demographic, and ICU treatment factors appear to be important determinants for physical convalescence during the post-ICU phase. The pathophysiological mechanisms involved are poorly understood, thereby resulting in exiguous evidence-based treatment strategies to date.

Purpose of review To better understand the established associations between hypocalcaemia and clinical outcomes, we synopsize the mechanisms involved in hypocalcaemia in the critically ill. We also provide an overview of the current evidence on managing hypocalcaemia in critical illness. Recent findings Hypocalcaemia is reported to occur in 55–85% of ICU patients. It appears to be associated with poor outcomes. It appears to be associated with poor outcomes, but it may be a marker rather than a direct cause of disease severity. The recommendations to correct calcium in major bleeding are found on weak evidence and require further exploration by a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Calcium administration in cardiac arrest has shown no benefit and may provoke harm. In addition, no RCT has assessed the risks and benefits of calcium supplementation in critically ill hypocalcemic patients. Several recent studies conclude that it may even harm septic ICU patients. These observations are supported by evidence that septic patients using calcium channel blockers may have better outcomes. Summary Hypocalcaemia is common in critically ill patients. Direct evidence that calcium supplementation improves their outcomes is lacking, and there is even some indication that it may be detrimental. Prospective studies are required to elucidate the risks and benefits, and the pathophysiological mechanisms involved.

IMPORTANCE: Despite high mortality rates of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) in the ICU, antifungal prophylaxis remains a subject of debate. We initiated nebulized conventional amphotericin B (c-AmB) as antifungal prophylaxis in COVID-19 patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). OBJECTIVES: To assess the CAPA incidence in COVID-19 patients on IMV treated with and without nebulized c-AmB as antifungal prophylaxis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to our adult 17-bed ICU in a university-affiliated general hospital in Ede, The Netherlands, between January 25, 2021, and July 9, 2021. Patients not requiring IMV or transferred from or to another ICU were excluded. From April 9, 2021, daily nebulized amphotericin B in all patients on IMV was initiated. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed in case of positive cultures for Aspergillus from the respiratory tract and/or unexplained respiratory deterioration. Incidence of probable and proven CAPA was compared between patients treated with and without nebulized antifungal prophylaxis using Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 39 intubated COVID-19 patients could be analyzed, of which 16 were treated with antifungal prophylaxis and 23 were not. Twenty-six patients underwent bronchoscopy with BAL. In patients treated with antifungal prophylaxis, the incidence of probable/proven CAPA was significantly lower when compared with no antifungal prophylaxis (27% vs 67%; p = 0.047). Incidence of tracheobronchial lesions and positive Aspergillus cultures and BAL-galactomannan was significantly lower in patients treated with antifungal prophylaxis (9% vs 47%; p = 0.040, 9% vs 53%; p = 0.044, and 20% vs 60%; p = 0.047, respectively). No treatment-related adverse events and no case of proven CAPA were encountered in patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Nebulization of c-AmB in critically ill COVID-19 patients on IMV is safe and may be considered as antifungal prophylaxis to prevent CAPA. However, a randomized controlled trial to confirm this is warranted.

Case Presentation A 67-year-old obese man (BMI 38.0) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic atrial fibrillation, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia stage II, stable for 8 years after chemotherapy, and a history of smoking presented to the ED with progressive dyspnea and fever due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. He was admitted to a general ward and treated with dexamethasone (6 mg IV once daily) and oxygen. On day 3 of hospital admission, he became progressively hypoxemic and was admitted to the ICU for invasive mechanical ventilation. Dexamethasone treatment was continued, and a single dose of tocilizumab (800 mg) was administered. On day 9 of ICU admission, voriconazole treatment was initiated after tracheal white plaques at bronchoscopy, suggestive of invasive Aspergillus tracheobronchitis, were noticed. However, his medical situation dramatically deteriorated.