The Euro-ASA registry demonstrated low peri-procedural and long-term mortality after ASA. This intervention provided durable relief of symptoms and a reduction of LV outflow tract obstruction in selected and highly symptomatic patients with obstructive HCM. As the post-procedural obstruction seems to be associated with both worse functional status and prognosis, optimal therapy should be focused on the elimination of LV outflow tract gradient.

Long-term mortality and (aborted) SCD rates after ASA and myectomy are similarly low. Patients who undergo ASA have more than twice the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation and a 5 times higher risk of the need for additional septal reduction therapy compared with those who undergo myectomy.

Background In the battle against the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, chloroquine has emerged as a new potential therapeutic option for the treatment of infected patients. A safety consideration for the application of chloroquine is its QTc-prolonging potential. Thus far, no data are available on the QTc-prolonging potential of chloroquine in COVID-19 patients. Objective To assess the degree of chloroquine-induced QTc prolongation in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Methods A baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) and ECGs recorded during chloroquine treatment were retrospectively collected in patients suspected of having COVID-19. The QTc interval was calculated by computerised and manual interpretation. Baseline and follow-up QTc intervals were compared using the paired samples t-test. Results A total of 95 patients had a baseline ECG recording and at least one ECG recording during chloroquine therapy.Chloroquine treatment resulted in a mean QTc prolongation of 35 ms (95% CI 28-43 ms) using computerised interpretation and 34 ms (95% CI 25-43 ms) using manual interpretation. No torsade de pointes was observed during chloroquine treatment. After manual review, 22 patients

Background-The

Patients with obstructive HCM who are treated at referral centers for HCM care have good survival and low SCD risk, similar to that of patients with nonobstructive HCM. The SCD risk of patients after myectomy was lower than after ASA or in the medical group.

ASA in younger patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was safe and effective for relief of symptoms at long-term follow-up. The authors propose that the indication for ASA can be broadened to younger patients.

Survival and clinical outcome were good and comparable after ASA and myectomy. More periprocedural complications and longer duration of hospital stay after myectomy were offset by higher gradients after ASA.

Twenty years after the introduction of alcohol septal ablation (ASA) for the treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the arrhythmogenicity of the ablation scar appears to be overemphasized. When systematically reviewing all studies comparing ASA with myectomy with long-term follow-up, (aborted) sudden cardiac death and mortality rates were found to be similarly low. The focus should instead shift toward lowering the rate of reinterventions and pacemaker implantations following ASA because, in this area, ASA still seems inferior to myectomy. Part of the reason for this difference is that ASA is limited by the route of the septal perforators, whereas myectomy is not. Improvement may be achieved by: 1) confining ASA to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy centers of excellence with high operator volumes; 2) improving patient selection using multidisciplinary heart teams; 3) use of (3-dimensional) myocardial contrast echocardiography for selecting the correct septal (sub)branch; and 4) use of appropriate amounts of alcohol for ASA.