Background/Aim: Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak is currently having a huge impact on medical resource allocation. Breast Cancer (BC) patients are concerned both with BC treatment and COVID-19. This study aimed to estimate the impact of anxiety among patients, caused by the spreading of COVID-19. Patients and Methods: Between the 16th of January and the 20th of March 2020, we retrospectively enrolled 160 patients. Eighty-two patients with a suspected breast lesion (SBL) were divided into two groups: PRE-COVID-19-SBL and POST-COVID-19-SBL. Seventy-eight BC patients were divided into PRE-COVID-19-BC and POST-COVID-19-BC. Patient characteristics including age, marital status, SBL/BC diameter, personal and family history of BC, clinical stage and molecular subtype were recorded. Procedure Refusal (PR) and Surgical Refusal (SR) were also recorded with their reason. Results: BC and SBL analysis showed no difference in pre-treatment characteristics (p>0.05). Both POST-COVID-19-SBL and POST-COVID-19-BC groups showed higher rates of PR and SR (p=0.0208, p=0.0065 respectively). Infection risk represented primary reason for refusal among POST-COVID-19 patients. Conclusion: COVID-19-related anxiety could affect patients' decisionmaking process. Since December 2019, the novel coronavirus (SARS-COV-2) has emerged as a highly contagious human pathogen. On March 20, 2020 more than 234000 cases were confirmed worldwide , with more than 9800 registered deaths (1). Following the initial outbreak in the Chinese Hubei Province on March 11, WHO has labelled the latest coronavirus disease COVID-19 (caused by SARS-COV-2) as a pandemic. The reported fatality rate is 4.2% globally (1, 2). Human to human transmission occurs through direct contact or air droplets (2) placing health care providers at a high risk due to the close proximity to potentially infected patients (3). Preliminary data of nationwide analysis in China demonstrated cancer as a risk factor for developing severe complications/disease course among COVID-19 patients (4, 5). Although further studies are required in order to accurately estimate the risk (6, 7) among patients who underwent chemotherapy or surgery in the months prior to the outbreak, the risk of developing severe conditions seems considerably higher compared to the general population (6). Breast Cancer (BC) is the most common neoplasm worldwide representing the primary cause of death due to neoplasms in Italy (5). A report published in 2017 stated that more than 50% of BC patients were older than 60 years (8). Therefore, due to the higher risk of adverse events in older patients, underlined in the preliminary data (9), it is essential to evaluate the risk of COVID-19 infection among these frail BC patients (10). Furthermore, during the COVID-19 outbreak, hospital resources are reallocated from elective and semi-elective procedures to meet the needs of COVID-19 patients in critical conditions (11). The subsequent scarcity of resources could potentially delay diagnostic evaluations and treatment of BC ...

Background: Surgical stress and anesthesia affect the patient's immune system. Analysis of the lymphocyte response after breast-conserving surgery was conducted to investigate the differences between effects after general and local anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six patients with breast cancer were enrolled for BCS through local or general anesthesia. Total leukocytes, total lymphocytes, lymphocyte-subsets including CD3 + , CD19 + , CD4 + , CD8 + , CD16 + CD56 + and CD4 + /CD8 + ratio was examined at baseline and on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3. Results: Baseline data showed no statistical difference between the two groups. Within-group ANOVA test showed significant differences for total leukocyte count (p<0.001), total lymphocyte count (p=0.009) and proportion of natural-killer cells (p=0.01) in the control group. Between-group analysis showed lower median values of total lymphocytes in the awake surgery group on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3 (p=0.001, p=0.02 and p=0.01, respectively) when compared to the control group. Patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia had higher total lymphocyte counts on postoperative day 2 (p=0.04). Conclusion: In this randomized study, breast-conserving surgery plus local anesthesia had a lower impact on postoperative lymphocyte response when compared to the same procedure performed under general anesthesia. Lymphocytes are fundamental types of white blood cells. Cells of the lymphatic system play a crucial role in the immune system due to their regulatory function through regulatory cytokines and due to cytotoxic activity against tumors and infections (1, 2). As underlined in the literature, surgical stress and general anesthesia may reduce the numbers of circulating lymphocytes (1-6). It is a widely held view that impairment of immune function can predispose to infectious complications such as surgical site infections (SSI) (5-8). Moreover, reduced cytotoxic activity of peripheralblood lymphocytes can increase the probability of tumor progression and metastasis (4, 5, 9-13). According to several studies, use of a minimally invasive approach in thoracic surgery (1, 14, 15) and abdominal surgery (16-18) demonstrated that immune function may be better preserved. However, there is lack of high-level evidence about the protective role of minimally invasive techniques in early lymphocyte response and it is conceivable that, regardless of the surgical approach, any 1879 This article is freely accessible online.

Background: Hemorrhoidal disease represents one of the most common anorectal disorders in the general population. Energy devices, such as LigaSureTM scalpel, have reshaped the concept of hemorrhoid surgery and in turn, have improved patient outcomes and simplified the work of surgeon. Objective: The study aims to evaluate the outcomes of LigaSureTM hemorrhoidectomy (LH) analyzing main post-operative complications rate, length of stay, operating time and time to return to work. Methods: In this monocentric descriptive study, from June 2001 to February 2019, 1454 consecutive patients, treated with LH for grade III and IV haemorrhoids, were analyzed. Complications were classified in early, late and long-term if they occurred within 1 month, between 1 and 2 months or after 2 months, respectively. Results: (90.2%) of patients were treated in day surgery regimen and mean operating time was 14.3 minutes. The post-operative pain decreased from 3.7 mean VAS on the 1st post-operative day to 0.1 mean VAS on 30th post-operative day. Early complications rate was 2.1%: urinary retention accounted for 1.8% of patients. 0.3% of patients experienced post-operative bleeding and only one required reoperation. Late complications rate was 5.8%: anal stenosis, incomplete healing and anal fissure were detected in 3.6%, 1.2% and 1% of patients, respectively. The Long term complications rate was 5.3 % : anal fistula, soiling, perianal abscess and recurrence were identified in 0.2%, 0.1%, 0.3% and 4.8% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: LH is a safe and fast procedure with a proven minimal complications rate.

Highlights Solitary brain metastasis of breast cancer in a patient with neurological symptoms as first presentation is a rare complication. Simultaneously perform a metastasectomy surgery plus right mastectomy, right axillary dissection and immediate breast reconstruction is unusual event. Successful combined surgical approach in a stage IV de novo breast cancer patient with single site brain metastasis at one year follow-up. Combined surgical approach offers the opportunity to treat two different oncological urgencies, reducing the unnecessary repeated surgical and anesthesiologic trauma.

Triple gallbladder represents a rare congenital anatomical abnormality that can be a diagnostic challenge in reason to its rarity and consequential difficulties with diagnosis and identification. A systematic review of all published literature between 1958 and 2022 was performed. We identified 20 previous studies that provided 20 cases of triple gallbladder; our case was also included in the analysis, making a total of 21 patients. All patients underwent on diagnostic imaging examinations. After 1985, 9 patients underwent US examination which allowed prompt recognition of triple gallbladder in 2 patients only. CT was performed in 3 patients and allowed the correct diagnosis in a case. In 4 patients, was performed MRCP which allowed the correct diagnosis of triple gallbladder in all patients. Preoperative imaging allows the recognition of triple gallbladder in 9 of 21 patients (43%); in 12 patients (57%) the diagnosis was intraoperative. On patients considered, 16/21 underwent cholecystectomy. In 15 cases, the excised gallbladders were submitted for histopathological characterization with detection of metaplasia of the mucosa in 3 patients, while papillary adenocarcinoma was found in one. Imaging plays a key role in the identification of the anatomical variants of gallbladder, especially triple gallbladder, as modern imaging techniques allow a detailed assessment of the course of the biliary tract for a correct preoperative diagnosis. It is also crucial to be aware of the association between this condition and the metaplasia phenomena with the development of adenocarcinoma, as this may influence the patient’s course of treatment.