The authors were able to achieve natural results with this new procedure in arm contouring. The technique is safe and effective with reproducible results when performed through multilayer fragmentation and liposuction with an anatomical extraction. Fat grafting can be performed for contouring with no additional complications.
Background Nowadays, corporal perception has evolved among different ethnic groups and a tendency to change from a slim to an athletic shape has been influenced by geography, culture, race, gender, and social media. Although exercise improves health status, physical appearance does as well in the long term. Patients often opt for an immediate solution for which High Definition Liposculpture has been the best choice. However, they differ on their preference regarding muscular definition. Objectives We are presenting a new therapeutic algorithm for High Definition Liposculpture in harmony with body biotypes and patients’ preferences. Methods We are reporting our experience on 1772 consecutive patients, classified according to their body type in: Endomorph (217), Ectomorph (195), and Mesomorph (1360), and treated according to our new algorithm. Patients in general good health asking for High Definition liposculpture were included, from June 2013 to September 2019. Pre- and postoperative photographs were taken to evaluate results. Results A total of 479 men and 1293 women were analyzed. Ages ranged from 23 to 69 years in men and 18 to 57 in women. Variable degree HD liposculpture was successfully performed in all cases. Minor complications included: Port wound dehiscence (1.2%), seroma (4.1%), prolonged bruising (1.5%), and hyperchromia (10.4%). Superficial burns (0.7%), localized infection (0.4%), erratic skin adhesion (1%), and flap necrosis (0.4%) were also reported. A high satisfaction index was reported in a non-standardized patient survey. Conclusion Our new algorithm helps in the decision making for High Definition liposculpture according to variable degrees of muscle definition due to patients’ preferences.
Background: Gluteal prominence is a unique characteristic that is widely acknowledged in female contouring but ignored in the male population. This study focuses on male gluteal aesthetics based on a muscular anatomical approach. Methods: A retrospective review of gluteal contouring in men from January of 2012 to September of 2019 was conducted. Male body sculpting surgery in the gluteal area was performed in most cases. Patients were included according to preoperative assessment and the American Heart Association risk analysis. The gluteal area was divided into four main anatomical contouring zones and classified according to the procedure type. The follow-up period of 3 months to 6 years was included with photographs and medical assessment data. A nonstandardized satisfaction survey was performed postoperatively. Results: The analysis included data from 374 consecutive gluteal dynamic definition liposculptures performed in men (mean age, 38.2 years; range, 20 to 66 years). Patients were treated according to the authors’ new classification of deformities. Fat extraction, liposhifting, and fat grafting were performed on a regular basis to enhance and define the gluteal area. A satisfaction index of 92.5 percent was reported. Minor complications were reported: seroma, 0.2 percent; prolonged bruising, 1.3 percent; and swelling, 1.8 percent. No necrosis, burns, or infections were reported. Conclusions: Men have been increasingly requesting improvement and definition of the buttocks, and our novel algorithm allows for a reliable method in this regard. The high satisfaction index supports the natural and athletic results accomplished with our new approach.
Background: Intraoperative hemostasis should be performed with great caution because bleeding is a huge enemy of patient safety during surgery. Tranexamic acid is a lysine synthetic derivate that inhibits fibrinolysis and diminishes the bleeding by blocking the five lysine-binding sites for plasminogen. The authors compare the efficacy of tranexamic acid versus placebo as a hemostatic agent in liposculpture procedures. Methods: The authors conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial in patients who were scheduled for liposculpture in three plastic surgery centers (Colombia and Mexico) between January of 2019 and February of 2020. One hundred forty-one patients were randomly assigned into three groups: intravenous (1 g of tranexamic acid), subcutaneous (1 g of tranexamic acid), and placebo (normal saline). Forty-seven patients were assigned to each group. There were 30 male patients and 111 female patients. The main outcome was to evaluate the amount of postoperative bleeding between groups. The primary outcome was measured by the hemoglobin point loss at day 1 (preoperative hemoglobin minus hemoglobin at day 1 postoperatively) and the hemoglobin (in milligrams per deciliter) point loss at day 5 (preoperative hemoglobin minus hemoglobin at day 5 postoperatively). Results: The authors found the intravenous intervention group to have a greater hemoglobin level than the other two groups on both the first postoperative day (p = 0.0001) and the fifth postoperative day (p = 0.001). There were no statistical differences in hemoglobin values between the placebo and the subcutaneous intervention groups. Conclusion: Intravenous tranexamic acid is a good therapeutic choice to implement on liposculpture procedures to decrease postoperative bleeding. Clinical Relevance Statement: The preoperative use of intravenous tranexamic acid not only decreases the bleeding rate after liposuction procedures, but also allows greater lipoaspirate volumes when performing high-definition liposculpture. Further studies are required to support the effectiveness of tranexamic acid within the infiltration solution. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.
Background: Multiple umbilicoplasty techniques have been described, even more after the advent of full tummy tuck procedures and the neoumbilicoplasty (X-shaped incision) described by the authors in a previous report. The authors decided to upgrade the technique (H-wing incision) because the former procedure is associated with relatively common complications. The authors report a case series of an upgraded technique for neoumbilicoplasty (H-wing technique), comparing its outcomes with their previous standard procedure (X-shaped incision). Methods: The authors reviewed their records for neoumbilicoplasties performed between January of 2014 and December of 2019. The authors divided the procedures according to the surgical technique and performed a detailed analysis regarding timing, complications, uses, and quality standards according to patients’ opinion through a nonstandardized survey. Results: A total of 407 procedures were distributed between two techniques: X-shaped incision, 179 procedures; and H-wing technique, 228 procedures. The former was performed from January of 2014 to October of 2016 and the latter from September of 2016 to December of 2019. High satisfaction indexes were found for both procedures; however, fewer complications were seen in the H-wing group. The X-shaped incision is thought to generate a greater force of tension over the flaps compared to that from the H-wing technique, which consequently increased the risk of flap necrosis and flattening. Conclusions: The H-wing technique for neoumbilicoplasty decreases the risk of postoperative complications such as dehiscence, skin necrosis, and navel flattening, and maintains high aesthetic standards and satisfaction indexes among patients. The technique can be used after either lipoabdominoplasty or secondary procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.