Background: Prior retrospective analysis confirmed that the Stroke Network of Wisconsin (SNOW) scale was highly predictive of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS). In this study, we prospectively validated the SNOW scale for the identification of LVO. We also compared its accuracy to other stroke scales retrospectively applied to the same dataset. Methods: The SNOW scale consists of 3 exam elements: expressive aphasia/Speaking difficulty (S), neglect (N) and Ocular deviation (O). The scale is positive if any one of these items is present. We prospectively evaluated all acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who presented within 24 hours after onset at Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Center between July 2017-February 2018 and calculated the SNOW score. We retrospectively calculated Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE), the Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED), the Vision Aphasia and Neglect Scale (VAN), the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity (CPSS), the Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS), the Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale (PASS) for all patients. The predictive performance of all scales and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) cut offs ≥6 were determined and compared. LVO was defined by total occlusions involving the intracranial internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery (M1), or basilar arteries Results: Among 344 AIS patients, 283 (82%) had vascular imaging and were included in the analysis. LVO was detected in 43 (15%). Positive SNOW scale showed: sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.63, positive predictive value = 0.29, negative predictive value= 0.96, and area under the curve =0.74. SNOW scale had comparable accuracy to predict LVO as other scales and NIHSS cut offs ≥6. If LVO includes M2, positive SNOW had sensitivity of 0.85, specificity of 0.70, positive predictive value of 0.49, negative predictive value of 0.93 and area under the curve of 0.77. SNOW had the highest sensitivity but lowest specificity among other scales. Conclusion: The SNOW scale is a simple and accurate tool to help identify AIS due to LVO, and it compares favorably to the other scales evaluated. A prospective validation study of the SNOW scale in the prehospital setting is underway. .
Background and Purpose: Abstractors of stroke records are at various levels of expertise in their role. Many have not received formal training and lack total confidence in the reliability of data entry. The purpose of this study was to engage participants in a 4-hour educational session to determine changes in confidence in performing stroke data abstraction and methods of interpretation. Methods: Pre and post-session surveys that contained six identical questions were utilized. The questions, reflected in the graph below, were utilized to measure changes in confidence when performing several tasks related to stroke record abstraction and data interpretation. Participants were asked to self-identify confidence level in performing the tasks on a scale of 1-4 at pre-session and again at post-session, where 1 is not at all confident, 2 is not very confident, 3 is somewhat confident and 4 is very confident. Results: Three abstraction trainings from April 2016 to April 2017 found a robust confidence level increase in all surveyed items. The chart displays each element’s mean based on the 1-4 scale. An overall confidence score was calculated at pre-session and at post-session. Internal reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha, and alpha coefficient for the six items is .924 indicating high internal consistency. Conclusions: The respondents had a mean of 2.37 pre-session compared to 3.28 post-session. This demonstrates an increase of 0.91 points from pre- to post-session, indicating a significant increase in confidence of data entry following the four-hour training course.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.