Stereotactic Synchrotron Radiotherapy (SSRT) and Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) are both novel approaches to treat brain tumor and potentially other tumors using synchrotron radiation. Although the techniques differ by their principles, SSRT and MRT share certain common aspects with the possibility of combining their advantages in the future. For MRT, the technique uses highly collimated, quasi-parallel arrays of X-ray microbeams between 50 and 600 keV. Important features of highly brilliant Synchrotron sources are a very small beam divergence and an extremely high dose rate. The minimal beam divergence allows the insertion of so called Multi Slit Collimators (MSC) to produce spatially fractionated beams of typically ∼25-75 micron-wide microplanar beams separated by wider (100-400 microns center-to-center(ctc)) spaces with a very sharp penumbra. Peak entrance doses of several hundreds of Gy are extremely well tolerated by normal tissues and at the same time provide a higher therapeutic index for various tumor models in rodents. The hypothesis of a selective radio-vulnerability of the tumor vasculature versus normal blood vessels by MRT was recently more solidified. SSRT (Synchrotron Stereotactic Radiotherapy) is based on a local drug uptake of high-Z elements in tumors followed by stereotactic irradiation with 80 keV photons to enhance the dose deposition only within the tumor. With SSRT already in its clinical trial stage at the ESRF, most medical physics problems are already solved and the implemented solutions are briefly described, while the medical physics aspects in MRT will be discussed in more detail in this paper.

Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a unique treatment that spatially distributes the x-ray beam into several microbeams of very high dose.MRT significantly delays tumor regrowth compared with uniform radiation therapy. The underlying mechanisms include tumor vascular disruption, senescence, and inflammatory and antitumor Purpose: Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a method that spatially distributes the x-ray beam into several microbeams of very high dose (peak dose), regularly separated by low-dose intervals (valley dose). MRT selectively spares normal tissues, relative to conventional (uniform broad beam [BB]) radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: To evaluate the effect of MRT on radioresistant melanoma, B16-F10 murine melanomas were implanted into mice ears. Tumors were either treated with MRT (407.6 Gy peak; 6.2 Gy valley dose) or uniform BB irradiation (6.2 Gy). Results: MRT induced significantly longer tumor regrowth delay than did BB irradiation. A significant 24% reduction in blood vessel perfusion was observed 5 days after MRT, and the cell proliferation index was significantly lower in melanomas treated by MRT compared with BB. MRT provoked a greater induction of senescence in melanoma cells. Bio-Plex analyses revealed enhanced concentration of monocyteattracting chemokines in the MRT group: MCP-1 at D5, MIP-1a, MIP-1b, IL12p40,

Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is still a preclinical approach in radiation oncology that uses planar micrometre wide beamlets with extremely high peak doses, separated by a few hundred micrometre wide low dose regions. Abundant preclinical evidence demonstrates that MRT spares normal tissue more effectively than conventional radiation therapy, at equivalent tumour control. In order to launch first clinical trials, accurate and efficient dose calculation methods are an inevitable prerequisite.In this work a hybrid dose calculation approach is presented that is based on a combination of Monte Carlo and kernel based dose calculation. In various examples the performance of the algorithm is compared to purely Monte Carlo and purely kernel based dose calculations.The accuracy of the developed algorithm is comparable to conventional pure Monte Carlo calculations. In particular for inhomogeneous materials the hybrid dose calculation algorithm out-performs purely convolution based dose calculation approaches. It is demonstrated that the hybrid algorithm can efficiently calculate even complicated pencil beam and cross firing beam geometries. The required calculation times are substantially lower than for pure Monte Carlo calculations.