Additional CTO PCI within 1 week after primary PCI for STEMI was feasible and safe. In patients with STEMI and concurrent CTO, we did not find an overall benefit for CTO PCI in terms of LVEF or LVEDV. The finding that early CTO PCI in the left anterior descending coronary artery subgroup was beneficial warrants further investigation. (Evaluating Xience and Left Ventricular Function in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Occlusions After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction; NTR1108).

Our findings demonstrate the prominent role of microvascular resistance in modulating the relationship between FFR and CFR and emphasize the importance of combined pressure and flow velocity measurements to evaluate coronary lesion severity and microvascular involvement.

Doppler-derived CFR is a better prognostic marker for LV function recovery after anterior MI than other currently used parameters of myocardial reperfusion.

No abstract

No abstract

Background-Microvascular function is increasingly being recognized as an important marker of risk in coronary artery disease, and may be accurately assessed by intracoronary Doppler flow velocity measurements. In the setting of STsegment-elevation myocardial infarction there are limited data regarding the prognostic value of microvascular function in both infarct-related and reference coronary arteries for long-term clinical outcome. We sought to determine the prognostic value of microvascular function, as assessed by Doppler flow velocity measurements, for cardiac mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Methods and Results-Between April 1997 and August 2000, we included 100 consecutive patients with a first anterior wall ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention, intracoronary Doppler flow velocity was measured in the infarct-related artery, to determine coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), diastolic deceleration time, and the presence of systolic retrograde flow, as well as in a reference vessel to determine reference vessel CFVR. The primary end point was cardiac mortality at 10-year follow-up. Complete follow-up was obtained in 94 patients (94%). At 10-year follow-up, cardiac mortality amounted to 14%. Cardiac mortality amounted to 5% when reference vessel CFVR was normal (≥2.1), in contrast to 31% when abnormal (<2.1; P=0.001). Reference vessel CFVR <2.1 was associated with a 4.09 increase in long-term cardiac mortality hazard after multivariate adjustment for identified predictors for cardiac mortality (hazard ratio, 4.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-14.17; P=0.03) Conclusions-Microvascular dysfunction, measured by reference vessel CFVR determined after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute anterior wall ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction is associated with a significantly increased long-term cardiac mortality. (Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:207-215.)

Background— Abnormalities in the coronary microcirculation are increasingly recognized as an elementary component of ischemic heart disease, which can be accurately assessed by coronary flow velocity reserve in reference vessels (refCFVR). We studied the prognostic value of refCFVR for long-term mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Methods and Results— We included patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent intracoronary physiological evaluation of ≥1 coronary lesion of intermediate severity between April 1997 and September 2006. RefCFVR was assessed if a coronary artery with <30% irregularities was present. RefCFVR >2.7 was considered normal. Patients underwent revascularization of all ischemia-causing lesions. Long-term follow-up was performed to document the occurrence of (cardiac) mortality. RefCFVR was determined in 178 patients. Kaplan–Meier estimates of 12-year all-cause mortality were 16.7% when refCFVR >2.7 and 39.6% when refCFVR ≤2.7 ( P <0.001), whereas Kaplan–Meier estimates for cardiac mortality were 7.7% when refCFVR >2.7 and 31.6% when refCFVR ≤2.7 ( P <0.001). After multivariable adjustment, refCFVR ≤2.7 was associated with a 2.24-fold increase in all-cause mortality hazard (hazard ratio, 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.13–4.44; P =0.020) and a 3.32-fold increase in cardiac mortality hazard (hazard ratio, 3.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.27–8.67; P =0.014). Impairment of refCFVR originated from significantly higher baseline flow velocity in the presence of significantly lower reference vessel baseline microvascular resistance ( P <0.001), indicating impaired coronary autoregulation as its cause. Conclusions— In patients with stable coronary artery disease, impaired refCFVR, resulting from increased baseline flow velocity indicating impaired coronary autoregulation, is associated with a significant increase in fatal events at long-term follow-up.

The diagnostic accuracy of three intracoronary-derived hemodynamic variables, as compared with the results of perfusion scintigraphy, is similar in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease. Cut-offvalues of 2.0 for CFVR, 0.65 for rCFVR and 0.75 for FFR can be used for clinical decision-making in this patient cohort. Discordant results were obtained in 23% of the cases that require prospective evaluation for appropriate patient management.