Graphical Abstract Highlights d SDS22 and I3 form a transient inactive complex with PP1 during PP1 biogenesis d SDS22-PP1-I3 disassembly by the p97 AAA-ATPase allows holoenzyme formation d Direct binding of I3 by the SEP domain of the p37 adapter mediates p97 recruitment d Disassembly involves ATP-driven pulling of I3 into the channel of the p97 hexamer Correspondence hemmo.meyer@uni-due.de In BriefWeith et al. demonstrate that newly synthesized PP1 is first held in an inactive complex by SDS22 and inhibitor-3 that needs to be disassembled by the p97 AAA-ATPase to promote exchange to substrate specifiers. Disassembly involves direct interaction of the p37 adapter with inhibitor-3, followed by its ATP-driven unfolding. SUMMARYThe functional diversity of protein phosphatase-1 (PP1), with its countless substrates, relies on the ordered assembly of alternative PP1 holoenzymes.Here, we show that newly synthesized PP1 is first held by its partners SDS22 and inhibitor-3 (I3) in an inactive complex, which needs to be disassembled by the p97 AAA-ATPase to promote exchange to substrate specifiers. Unlike p97-mediated degradative processes that require the Ufd1-Npl4 ubiquitin adapters, p97 is targeted to PP1 by p37 and related adapter proteins. Reconstitution with purified components revealed direct interaction of the p37 SEP domain with I3 without the need for ubiquitination, and ATP-driven pulling of I3 into the central channel of the p97 hexamer, which triggers dissociation of I3 and SDS22. Thus, we establish regulatory ubiquitin-independent protein complex disassembly as part of the functional arsenal of p97 and define an unanticipated essential step in PP1 biogenesis that illustrates the molecular challenges of ordered subunit exchange. and helped with supervision of the project. J.H. generated adapter cell lines. I.P. and A.M. generated and provided baculoviruses coding for PP1 components. F.K. and M. Kaiser performed mass spectrometry measurements. J.d.P.G. and M.B. advised and analyzed data. H.M. conceived and supervised the project and wrote the manuscript. DECLARATION OF INTERESTSThe authors declare no competing interests.

Faithful chromosome segregation during mitosis is tightly regulated by opposing activities of Aurora B kinase and protein phosphatase-1 (PP1). PP1 function at kinetochores has been linked to SDS22, but the exact localization of SDS22 and how it affects PP1 are controversial. Here, we confirm that SDS22 is required for PP1 activity, but show that SDS22 does not normally localize to kinetochores. Instead, SDS22 is kept in solution by formation of a ternary complex with PP1 and inhibitor-3 (I3). Depletion of I3 does not affect the amount of PP1 at kinetochores but causes quantitative association of SDS22 with PP1 on KNL1 at the kinetochore. Such accumulation of SDS22 at kinetochores interferes with PP1 activity and inhibits Aurora B threonine-232 dephosphorylation, which leads to increased Aurora B activity in metaphase and persistence in anaphase accompanied with segregation defects. We propose a model in which I3 regulates an SDS22-mediated PP1 activation step in solution that precedes SDS22 dissociation and transfer of PP1 to kinetochores, and which is required for PP1 to efficiently antagonize Aurora B.

Genomic variation impacts on cellular networks by affecting the abundance (e.g., protein levels) and the functional states (e.g., protein phosphorylation) of their components. Previous work has focused on the former, while in this context, the functional states of proteins have largely remained neglected. Here, we generated high‐quality transcriptome, proteome, and phosphoproteome data for a panel of 112 genomically well‐defined yeast strains. Genetic effects on transcripts were generally transmitted to the protein layer, but specific gene groups, such as ribosomal proteins, showed diverging effects on protein levels compared with RNA levels. Phosphorylation states proved crucial to unravel genetic effects on signaling networks. Correspondingly, genetic variants that cause phosphorylation changes were mostly different from those causing abundance changes in the respective proteins. Underscoring their relevance for cell physiology, phosphorylation traits were more strongly correlated with cell physiological traits such as chemical compound resistance or cell morphology, compared with transcript or protein abundance. This study demonstrates how molecular networks mediate the effects of genomic variants to cellular traits and highlights the particular importance of protein phosphorylation.

The ubiquitin-directed AAA-ATPase VCP/p97 facilitates degradation of damaged or misfolded proteins in diverse cellular stress response pathways. Resolving the complexity of its interactions with partner and substrate proteins and understanding its links to stress signaling is therefore a major challenge. Here, we used affinity-purification SWATH mass spectrometry (AP-SWATH) to identify proteins that specifically interact with the substrate-trapping mutant, p97-E578Q. AP-SWATH identified differential interactions over a large detection range from abundant p97 cofactors to pathway-specific partners and individual ligases such as RNF185 and MUL1 that were trapped in p97-E578Q complexes. In addition, we identified various substrate proteins and candidates including the PP1 regulator CReP/PPP1R15B that dephosphorylates eIF2α and thus counteracts attenuation of translation by stress-kinases. We provide evidence that p97 with its Ufd1-Npl4 adapter ensures rapid constitutive turnover and balanced levels of CReP in unperturbed cells. Moreover, we show that p97-mediated degradation, together with a reduction in CReP synthesis, is essential for timely stress-induced reduction of CReP levels and, consequently, for robust eIF2α phosphorylation to enforce the stress response. Thus, our results demonstrate that p97 not only facilitates bulk degradation of misfolded proteins upon stress, but also directly modulates the integrated stress response at the level of signaling.

Expanding a statistical approach called Mendelian randomization to include multiple variables may help researchers to identify new molecular causes of specific traits.

The complexity of many cellular and organismal traits results from the integration of genetic and environmental factors via molecular networks. Network structure and effect propagation are best understood at the level of functional modules, but so far, no concept has been established to include the global network state. Here, we show when and how genetic perturbations lead to molecular changes that are confined to small parts of a network versus when they lead to modulation of network states. Integrating multi‐omics profiling of genetically heterogeneous budding and fission yeast strains with an array of cellular traits identified a central state transition of the yeast molecular network that is related to PKA and TOR (PT) signaling. Genetic variants affecting this PT state globally shifted the molecular network along a single‐dimensional axis, thereby modulating processes including energy and amino acid metabolism, transcription, translation, cell cycle control, and cellular stress response. We propose that genetic effects can propagate through large parts of molecular networks because of the functional requirement to centrally coordinate the activity of fundamental cellular processes.

The complexity of many cellular and organismal traits results from poorly understood mechanisms integrating genetic and environmental factors via molecular networks. Here, we show when and how genetic perturbations lead to molecular changes that are confined to small parts of a network versus when they lead to large-scale adaptations of global network states. Integrating multi-omics profiling of genetically heterogeneous budding and fission yeast strains with an array of cellular traits identified a central state transition of the yeast molecular network that is related to PKA and TOR (PT) signaling. Genetic variants affecting this PT state globally shifted the molecular network along a single-dimensional axis, thereby modulating processes including energy- and amino acid metabolism, transcription, translation, cell cycle control and cellular stress response. We propose that genetic effects can propagate through large parts of molecular networks because of the functional requirement to centrally coordinate the activity of fundamental cellular processes.

No abstract