Hypertree decompositions (HDs), as well as the more powerful generalized hypertree decompositions (GHDs), and the yet more general fractional hypertree decompositions (FHDs) are hypergraph decomposition methods successfully used for answering conjunctive queries and for solving constraint satisfaction problems. Every hypergraph H has a width relative to each of these methods: its hypertree width hw(H) , its generalized hypertree width ghw(H) , and its fractional hypertree width fhw(H) , respectively. It is known that hw(H)≤ k can be checked in polynomial time for fixed k , while checking ghw(H)≤ k is NP-complete for k ≥ 3 . The complexity of checking fhw(H)≤ k for a fixed k has been open for over a decade. We settle this open problem by showing that checking fhw(H)≤ k is NP-complete, even for k=2 . The same construction allows us to prove also the NP-completeness of checking ghw(H)≤ k for k=2 . After that, we identify meaningful restrictions that make checking for bounded ghw or fhw tractable or allow for an efficient approximation of the fhw .
Modern applications combine information from a great variety of sources. Oftentimes, some of these sources, like machine-learning systems, are not strictly binary but associated with some degree of (lack of) confidence in the observation. We propose MV-Datalog and $\mathrm{MV-Datalog}^\pm$ as extensions of Datalog and $\mathrm{Datalog}^\pm$ , respectively, to the fuzzy semantics of infinite-valued Łukasiewicz logic $\mathbf{L}$ as languages for effectively reasoning in scenarios where such uncertain observations occur. We show that the semantics of MV-Datalog exhibits similar model theoretic properties as Datalog. In particular, we show that (fuzzy) entailment can be decided via minimal fuzzy models. We show that when they exist, such minimal fuzzy models are unique and can be characterised in terms of a linear optimisation problem over the output of a fixed-point procedure. On the basis of this characterisation, we propose similar many-valued semantics for rules with existential quantification in the head, extending $\mathrm{Datalog}^\pm$ .
It is well known that the tractability of conjunctive query answering can be characterised in terms of treewidth when the problem is restricted to queries of bounded arity. We show that a similar characterisation also exists for classes of queries with unbounded arity and degree 2. To do so we introduce hypergraph dilutions as an alternative method to primal graph minors for studying substructures of hypergraphs. Using dilutions we observe an analogue to the Excluded Grid Theorem for degree 2 hypergraphs. In consequence, we show that that the tractability of conjunctive query answering can be characterised in terms of generalised hypertree width. A similar characterisation is also shown for the corresponding counting problem. We also generalise our main structural result to arbitrary bounded degree and discuss possible paths towards a characterisation of tractable conjunctive query answering for the bounded degree case. CCS CONCEPTS• Mathematics of computing → Hypergraphs; • Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness; • Information systems → Relational database query languages.
Modern data processing applications often combine information from a variety of complex sources. Oftentimes, some of these sources, like Machine-Learning systems or crowd-sourced data, are not strictly binary but associated with some degree of confidence in the observation. Ideally, reasoning over such data should take this additional information into account as much as possible. To this end, we propose extensions of Datalog and Datalog+/- to the semantics of Lukasiewicz logic Ł, one of the most common fuzzy logics. We show that such an extension preserves important properties from the classical case and how these properties can lead to efficient reasoning procedures for these new languages.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.