Background The majority of combat deaths occur in the prehospital setting. Efforts to increase survival including blood transfusions are made in the prehospital setting. The blood products available in the Role 1 setting include whole blood (WB), red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and lyophilized (freeze-dried) plasma (FDP). Methods This is a secondary analysis of a previously published dataset within the Prehospital Trauma Registry (PHTR) from 2003 through May 2019. Deterministic linking was used when possible with the DoD Trauma Registry for outcome data. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results We identified 1,357 patient encounters in the PHTR. Within that group, 28 patients received a prehospital blood product, with 41 total administrations: WB (18), RBCs (12), FFP (6), FDP (3), and blood not otherwise specified (2). Outcome data were available for 17 of the 28 patients. The median injury severity score was 20, with the thorax being the most frequent seriously injured body region. Most (94%) patients survived to discharge. The median ICU days was 11 (Interquartile Range [IQR] 3-19), and the median hospital days was 19 (IQR 8-29). The average volume (units) of RBCs was 6.0 (95% CI 1.9-10.1), WB 2.8 (95% CI 0.0-5.6), platelets 0.7 (95% CI 0.0-1.4), and FFP 5.0 (95% CI 1.2-8.8). Conclusions The use of prehospital blood products is uncommon in U.S. combat settings. Patients who received blood products sustained severe injuries but had a high survival rate. Given the infrequent but critical use and potentially increased need for adequate prolonged casualty care in future near-peer conflicts, optimizing logistical chain circulation is required.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction Airway compromise is the second leading cause of potentially preventable prehospital combat death. Endotracheal intubation (ETI) remains the most common role 1 airway intervention. Video laryngoscopy (VL) is superior to direct laryngoscopy (DL) for first-attempt intubation, especially in less-experienced providers and for trauma patients. The cost has been a major challenge in pushing VL technology far-forward; however, the cost of equipment continues to become more affordable. We conducted a market analysis of VL devices under $10,000 for possible options for role 1. Materials and Methods We searched Google, PubMed, and the Food and Drug Administration database from August 2022 to January 2023 with a combination of several keywords to identify current VL market options under $10,000. After identifying relevant manufacturers, we then reviewed individual manufacturer or distributor websites for pricing data and system specifications. We noted several characteristics regarding VL device design for comparison. These include monitor features, size, modularity, system durability, battery life, and reusability. When necessary, we requested formal price quotes from respective companies. Results We identified 17 VL options under $10,000 available for purchase, 14 of which were priced below $5,000 for individual units. Infium (n = 3) and Vimed Medical (n = 4) provided the largest number of unique models. VL options under $10,000 exist in both reusable and disposable modalities. These modalities included separate monitors as well as monitors attached to the VL handle. Disposable options, on a per-unit basis, cost less than reusable options. Conclusions Several VL options exist within our goal price point in both reusable and disposable options. Clinical studies assessing the technology performance of ETI and deliberate downselection are needed to identify the most cost-effective solution for role 1 dispersion.