Background: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been compared with liberal fluid administration in non-optimized perioperative settings. It is not known whether GDFT is of value within an enhanced recovery protocol incorporating fluid restriction. This study evaluated GDFT under these circumstances in patients undergoing elective colectomy. Results: Eighty-five patients were randomized, and there were 37 patients in each group for analysis. Nine patients in the GDFT and four in the fluid restriction group received oral bowel preparation for either anterior resection (12) or subtotal colectomy (1). Patients in the GDFT group received more colloid during surgery (mean 591 versus 297 ml; P = 0·012) and had superior cardiac indices (mean corrected flow time 374 versus 355 ms; P = 0·018). However, no differences were observed between the GDFT and fluid restriction groups with regard to surgical recovery (mean SRS after 7 days 47 versus 46 respectively; P = 0·853), other secondary outcomes (mean aldosterone/renin ratio 9 versus 8; P = 0·898), total postoperative fluid (median 3750 versus 2400 ml; P = 0·604), length of hospital stay (median 6 versus 5 days; P = 0·570) or number of patients with complications (26 versus 27; P = 1·000). Conclusion:GDFT did not provide clinical benefit in patients undergoing elective colectomy within a protocol incorporating fluid restriction. Registration number: NCT00911391 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Instillation and infusion of intraperitoneal ropivacaine after colectomy improves early surgical recovery. This was associated with a blunting of postsurgical systemic cytokines and cortisol. Patients also had significantly reduced pain and opioid use over and above the effect of an epidural infusion. Therefore a transient chemical afferentectomy with clinical benefit is possible with this method. A longer IPLA infusion duration needs to be studied. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov and carries the ID number NCT00722709.

Preoperative dexamethasone was associated with a higher rate of distant recurrence in patients undergoing colectomy for colon cancer. Given the small sample size, this finding should be interpreted with caution, but warrants further investigation in a prospective study.