Attributions for events with information varying on level of causality and context (relationship, achievement) were examined in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Participants rated the degree to which the causes of an event were a function of three dispositional dimensions of the primary character, two dimensions of situational factors, and a combination of these. They also wrote essays justifying their ratings. Older and younger adults made more dispositional attributions than middle-aged adults did in relationship situations. Younger and middle-aged adults were more relativistic in their causal attributions than older adults. Relative proportions of dispositional justifications correlated with quantitative dispositional ratings, but only for relationship situations (suggesting strong domain-specific influences on attributional judgments). Clusters of individuals differing in patterns of attributional justifications were identified. Cluster groups showed salient differences in dispositional ratings and dialectical reasoning. Findings are discussed in terms of how beliefs and values individuals hold about situations influence attributional judgments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.