Injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament frequently occur under combined mechanisms of knee loading. This in vitro study was designed to measure levels of ligament force under dual combinations of individual loading states and to determine which combinations generated high force. Resultant force was recorded as the knee was extended passively from 90 degrees of flexion to 5 degrees of hyperextension under constant tibial loadings. The individual loading states were 100 N of anterior tibial force, 10 Nm of varus and valgus moment, and 10 Nm of internal and external tibial torque. Straight anterior tibial force was the most direct loading mechanisms; the mean ligament force was approximately equal to applied anterior tibial force near 30 degrees of flexion and to 150% of applied tibial force at full extension. The addition of internal tibial torque to a knee loaded by anterior tibial force produced dramatic increases of force at full extension and hyperextension. This loading combination produced the highest ligament forces recorded in the study and is the most dangerous in terms of potential injury to the ligament. In direct contrast, the addition of external tibial torque to a knee loaded by anterior tibial force decreased the force dramatically for flexed positions of the knee; at close to 90 degrees of flexion, the anterior cruciate ligament became completely unloaded. The addition of varus moment to a knee loaded by anterior tibial force increased the force in extension and hyperextension, whereas the addition of valgus moment increased the force at flexed positions. These states of combined loading also could present an increased risk for injury. Internal tibial torque is an important loading mechanism of the anterior cruciate ligament for an extended knee. The overall risk of injury to the ligament from varus or valgus moment applied in combination with internal tibial torque is similar to the risk from internal tibial torque alone. External tibial torque was a relatively unimportant mechanism for generating anterior cruciate ligament force.
The objectives of this study were to establish baseline Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) data for Division I collegiate athletes and to determine the effects of injury severity and training time. All participating athletes (N = 562) at a major university were evaluated with the SF-36. Regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors. When the men without injury were compared with a previously established norm group, there was a significant increase in the role emotional score. In the women without injury there were significant increases in mental component summary, physical function, role emotional, mental health, and vitality scores when compared with the norm group. Serious injury was a predictor of lower scores in all domains, whereas minimal injury was predictive of lower physical component summary, role physical, bodily pain, social function, and general health scores. Increased training time was predictive of higher mental component summary, role physical, vitality, and general health scores. Elite collegiate athletes scored differently from previously established age-matched norms, and injury was a strong predictor of lower scores.
Ligamentous injuries to the tarsometatarsal joints are uncommon and usually result from violent trauma to the forefoot. A more subtle tarsometatarsal injury consisting of an isolated diastasis of the first and second tarsometatarsal rays has recently been described. This injury is thought to be caused by a rupture of Lisfranc's ligament. Nine injuries that occurred during athletics are described. History and physical findings are crucial for arousing the clinician's suspicion for this injury, but confirmation can best be obtained by comparison weight-bearing radiographs; the space between the first and second metatarsal bases may be widened 2 to 5 mm. Nonoperative treatment consisting of casting and the use of crutches for 4 to 6 weeks was successful in returning patients back to athletics; however, the time to return to competition averaged 4 months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.