75Significant differences exist in the availability of healthcare worker (HCW) SARS-CoV-2 testing between 76 countries, and existing programmes focus on screening symptomatic rather than asymptomatic staff. Over a 77 3-week period (April 2020), 1,032 asymptomatic HCWs were screened for SARS-CoV-2 in a large UK 78 teaching hospital. Symptomatic staff and symptomatic household contacts were additionally tested. Real-79 time RT-PCR was used to detect viral RNA from a throat+nose self-swab. 3% of HCWs in the 80 asymptomatic screening group tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. 17/30 (57%) were truly 81 asymptomatic/pauci-symptomatic. 12/30 (40%) had experienced symptoms compatible with coronavirus 82 disease 2019 (COVID-19) >7 days prior to testing, most self-isolating, returning well. Clusters of HCW 83 infection were discovered on two independent wards. Viral genome sequencing showed that the majority of 84HCWs had the dominant lineage B•1. Our data demonstrates the utility of comprehensive screening of 85HCWs with minimal or no symptoms. This approach will be critical for protecting patients and hospital 86 staff. 87 88

Significant differences exist in the availability of healthcare worker (HCW) SARS-CoV-2 testing between countries, and existing programmes focus on screening symptomatic rather than asymptomatic staff. Over a 3-week period (April 2020), 1,032 asymptomatic HCWs were screened for SARS-CoV-2 in a large UK teaching hospital.Symptomatic staff and symptomatic household contacts were additionally tested. Realtime RT-PCR was used to detect viral RNA from a throat+nose self-swab.3% of HCWs in the asymptomatic screening group tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. 17/30 (57%) were truly asymptomatic/pauci-symptomatic. 12/30 (40%) had experienced symptoms compatible with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) >7 days prior to testing, most self-isolating, returning well. Clusters of HCW infection were discovered on two independent wards. Viral genome sequencing showed that the majority of HCWs had the dominant lineage B•1. Our data demonstrates the utility of comprehensive screening of HCWs with minimal or no symptoms. This approach will be critical for protecting patients and hospital staff.

The belief that, for the individual patient, the benefit of prompt and continued use of antimicrobials outweighs any potential harm is a significant barrier to improved stewardship of these vital agents. Antimicrobial stewardship may be perceived as utilitarian rationing, seeking to preserve the availability of effective antimicrobials by limiting the development of resistance in a manner which could conflict with the immediate treatment of the patient in need. This view does not account for the growing evidence of antimicrobial-associated harm to individual patients. This review sets out the evidence for antimicrobial-associated harm and how this should be balanced with the need for prompt and appropriate therapy in infection. It describes the mechanisms by which antimicrobials may harm patients including: mitochondrial toxicity; immune cell toxicity; adverse drug reactions; selection of resistant organisms within a given patient; and disruption of the microbiome. Finally, the article indicates how the harms of antimicrobials may be mitigated and identifies areas for research and development in this field.