BACKGROUND
The information-seeking behavior of physicians to cater to the patient's information needs is not comprehensively studied.
OBJECTIVE
Our cross-sectional study's key goals were to understand providers' information-seeking behavior regarding answering patients' specific questions about treatments' benefits and harms.
METHODS
Using an interview guide, we collected pertinent data from structured one-on-one interviews.
RESULTS
119 providers from eight departments participated. The majority, 62% (77/124), reported that patients brought information about treatment and 56% (69/124) about a diagnosis. 72%(89/124) reported using DynaMed, UptoDate, Lexicomp, and 54%(67/124) used Pubmed. 27%(33/124) referenced the clinical practice guidelines, 17% (21/124) referred to textbooks, and 15% (19/124) discussed with colleagues. 35%(44/124) reported conducting traditional critical appraisals to determine information's credibility.
CONCLUSIONS
We found that most physicians across all medical specialties used and preferred point-of-care tools such as DynaMed and UptoDate. However, many providers still rely on the reputation of the information source, such as a journal impact factor and the author's research credentials, to determine the credibility and reliability of the information. We believe healthcare providers need to take a more active role in guiding patients to credible, evidence-based sources of health information. Physicians need to use traditional critical appraisal tools to determine information credibility.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.