A sensitive and specific method for the quantification of JWH-018, JWH-073, and JWH-250 and the qualitative identification of JWH-019 in whole blood was developed and validated. Samples fortified with JWH-018-d₉ and JWH-073-d₉ underwent liquid-liquid extraction and were analyzed by liquid chromatography-positive ion electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. Two transitions were monitored for all analytes except JWH-250, for which there was only one available transition. JWH-019 did not meet the stringent requirements for quantitative analysis, and thus this method is only appropriate for the qualitative identification of this compound in whole blood. The linear range was 0.1-20 μg/L for all quantitative analytes. The maximum average within and between-run imprecision was 7.9% and 10.2%, respectively, and all controls quantified within 8.2% of target concentrations. Process efficiency, a measurement that takes into effect extraction efficiency and matrix effect, was ≥ 32.0% for all quantitative analytes; similar results were obtained for the deuterated internal standards. All analytes were stable at room, refrigerated, and frozen temperatures for at least 30 days. The method was used to quantify JWH-018 and JWH-073 in a blood specimen collected from a person known to have used an herbal incense blend containing these substances.
Synthetic cannabinoid drugs do not cross react on traditional marijuana immunoassay tests, preventing their use in large scale drug screening programs. This paper describes the validation and performance characteristics of two enzyme linked immunosorbent assays designed to detect the use of two common synthetic cannabinoids in urine, JWH-018 and JWH-250. The JWH-018 assay has significant cross-reactivity with several synthetic cannabinoids and their metabolites, whereas the JWH-250 assay has limited cross-reactivity. The assays are calibrated at 5 ng/mL with the 5-OH metabolite of JWH-018 and the 4-OH metabolite of JWH-250. The method was validated with 114 urine samples for JHW-018 and 84 urine samples for JWH-250 and confirmed by using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, which tests for metabolites of JWH-018, JWH-019, JWH-073, JWH-250 and AM-2201. The accuracy was determined to be 98% with greater than 95% sensitivity and specificity for both assays.
ObjectiveRates of diabetes mellitus are higher in South Asians than in other populations and persist after migration. One unexplored cause may be higher exposure to persistent organic pollutants associated with diabetes in other populations. We compared organochlorine (OC) pesticide concentrations in South Asian immigrants and European whites to determine whether the disease was positively associated with OC pesticides in South Asians.Research Design and MethodsSouth Asians of Tamil or Telugu descent (n = 120) and European whites (n = 72) were recruited into the London Life Sciences Population Study cohort. Blood samples as well as biometric, clinical, and survey data were collected. Plasma levels of p,p′-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), p,p′- dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, β-hexachlorohexane (HCH), and polychlorinated biphenyl-118 were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. South Asian cases and controls were categorized by binary exposure (above vs below the 50th percentile) to perform logistic regression.ResultsTamils had approximately threefold to ninefold higher levels of OC pesticides, and Telugus had ninefold to 30-fold higher levels compared with European whites. The odds of exposure to p,p′-DDE above the 50th percentile was significantly greater in South Asian diabetes cases than in controls (OR: 7.00; 95% CI: 2.22, 22.06). The odds of exposure to β-HCH above the 50th percentile was significantly greater in the Tamil cases than in controls (OR: 9.35; 95% CI: 2.43, 35.97).ConclusionsSouth Asian immigrants have a higher body burden of OC pesticides than European whites. Diabetes mellitus is associated with higher p,p′-DDE and β-HCH concentrations in this population. Additional longitudinal studies of South Asian populations should be performed.
This study was undertaken to determine if metabolites of fentanyl might be useful in the detection and monitoring of substance abuse. The presence of fentanyl and two of its metabolites in the urine and saliva of seven female patients receiving small doses (110 +/- 56 micrograms) of fentanyl was studied up to 96 h from the time of administration. Fentanyl and its two metabolites (norfentanyl and despropionylfentanyl) were extracted from samples and analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Unchanged fentanyl was detectable in urine in all patients immediately postoperatively and in 3 of 7 patients at 24 h. By 72 h, fentanyl was undetectable. Norfentanyl was present in larger quantities than fentanyl immediately postoperatively and was detected in all patients at 48 h and in 4 of 7 patients at 96 h. Despropionylfentanyl was not detected in any of the urine specimens tested. Neither fentanyl nor its metabolites could be detected consistently at any time in saliva. Saliva testing does not appear to be a viable alternative to urine testing based on this study. Urinary norfentanyl might be considered as the substance of choice when testing for fentanyl abuse.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.