Despite the large body of empirical and theoretical work that has emerged from positive psychology in the recent decades, surprisingly little work has been done by this field on joy. As a result, the work that has been done on joy is disjointed, and frequently does not build on the previous literature; indeed, the various definitions of joy that psychologists use often conflict with one another. The present article, therefore, seeks to address this gap in the positive psychology literature and provide suggestions for future directions, by placing the existing psychological work on joy in dialogue with itself and also in dialogue with the work on joy done in other fields, including, theology and religious studies, philosophy, and literature. The first part of this paper provides a systematic review of the existing work on joy and aims to develop an overarching framework that can be used to operationalize and define joy. This paper will then provide some suggestions for future directions for psychological research into joy, and will close by suggesting reasons why joy is an important phenomenon toward which positive psychology should turn its focus. ARTICLE HISTORY
This article provides an account of the ethical issues that arise when digital technologies and online spaces are structured by Big Data algorithms. We show that although the uses of Big Data may be new, traditional theological and ethical categories are still applicable, including “the sins of the fathers” from hamartiology and the scholastic concept of haecceity. Using these resources, we map the overall ecosystem in which digital technologies are developed and used, identifying the relationships between the individuals and organizations involved. We show how these relationships are often characterized by various kinds of harm. We then argue for a reorientation of the tech ecosystem toward co‐liberation—and ultimately, joy.
This chapter describes and expands upon virtue ethical and virtue theoretical approaches to moral education in and for virtual spaces. Building on existing claims that virtual spaces call for new kinds of virtues, we argue that structural constraints make risks and vices especially hard to overcome in these contexts. We organise these constraints around a three-fold approach to integrity, according to how they hinder knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-unity. We then turn to positive recommendations for removing these barriers. We outline implications for end users by exploring the need for the development of the "burdened virtues", applying ideas from Lisa Tessman (2005). We also consider what it would look like for this kind of moral development to be supported by educators, policymakers, and other leaders within the tech ecosystem. We suggest that the way forward will be to educate for and build spaces in which the online and offline worlds are drawn into closer alignment, supporting integrity in all its forms.
User experience of digital platforms and technologies tends to be quite ‘thin’, characterized by low-quality engagements such as addictive tendencies or browsing on autopilot. This paper takes an interdisciplinary approach to identifying more cognitive and active dimensions of ‘thick’ user experience, introducing a new design and UX framework which is centered around the notion of joy. In this paper, we explain how we are piloting this framework and working at developing measurements that operationalize the different dimensions of joy, through a series of case studies of different digital platforms and applications.The first part of this paper develops a conceptual framework for building for joy. We consider existing UX frameworks which focus on dimensions such as delight, happiness, satisfaction, pleasure, adoption, and retention. We explain how many harmful kinds of engagement either do not impact negatively on these kinds of assessments, or even result in higher scores. We then draw on recent work in positive psychology, which has seen a move from happiness and ‘thin’ conceptions of pleasure to ‘thicker’ notions such as joy. Although there is no one definition of joy, the kind of experience we are interested in involves an intense feeling of fulfilment and a deep alignment between some good in the world and oneself (Johnson, 2020a, 2020b). This kind of joy encompasses a range of motivations and intensities, and incorporates a cognitive profile which includes recognition of integrity and dependence on external factors, as well as normative assessments.The second part of this paper provides an overview of our case studies, which explore how design elements of digital platforms interact with the motivational, cognitive, and normative dimensions of joy identified within our conceptual framework. For these studies, we used a range of methodologies, including surveys which aimed to collect both quantitative and qualitative data, structured interviews, and autoenthnography. We suggest that platforms and applications which do well within our joy-focused framework promote a deeper and healthier level of engagement with digital technologies. We end by opening up some new research directions, including how building for joy might correlate with increases in adoption, retention, task success, and financial profitability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.