In the United States and abroad, the nonprofit/nongovernmental sector is large and economically important, but at an organizational level, individual nonprofits often struggle to survive. In an effort to build social capital as well as economic viability, nonprofits have routinely sought partnerships with similar organizations (Foster & Meinhard, 2002). Takahashi and Smutny (2002) posit that interorganizational collaborations (IOCs) increase costeffectiveness, enhance the capacity of partnering agencies, and increase the comprehensive nature of services for nonprofits. By definition, IOCs represent the mutual partnering of organizations in more or less formal coalitions or short-term partnerships around specific events or goals or for the purpose of sharing information and networking (Wood & Gray, 1991). In practical terms, IOCs involve partnerships of pairs, small groups of organizations, or large multiorganizational alliances (Keyton, Ford, & Smith, 2008; Stohl & Walker, 2002). IOCs are seen as key subset of interorganizational relationships (IORs) and a major growth area across all organizational sectors.
Interorganizational collaboration is often at the crux of making decisions that impact and are impacted by inherent tensions of the human experience. Many theoretical models and literature reviews conceptualize collaboration through a teleological lens where being "good" is tied to accomplishing the collaboration's goals. In this essay, we broaden the understanding of collaboration problematizing what is meant by a good outcome. We propose collaboration is a principled activity with associated processes and outcomes and advance three arguments. First, that collaboration when viewed as a principled activity changes our understanding of collaborative processes and the way we might evaluate collaborative outcomes. Second, that dialogue operates as "ethical practice" and is woven through communication in collaboration that facilitates principles such as legitimacy, accountability, and shared power. Third, a principled lens of collaboration further develops the principled negotiation process, problematizing so-called objective criteria for decision making. This essay begins by attending to certain principles associated with collaboration processes. We review the experience of communication in collaboration as being oriented toward dialogue, interests, conflict, consensus, and solutions. Building on the ways in which communication is oriented to in collaboration, we use an empirical example to posit the importance of conceptualizing and evaluating collaboration as principled. By directing attention to principles as an important component of collaboration, scholars are positioned to recognize useful responses and the implications of those responses for collaborating.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.