Antimicrobial resistance threatens the viability of modern medicine, which is largely dependent on the successful prevention and treatment of bacterial infections. Unfortunately, there are few new therapeutics in the clinical pipeline, particularly for Gram-negative bacteria. We now present a detailed evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of cannabidiol, the main non-psychoactive component of cannabis. We confirm previous reports of Gram-positive activity and expand the breadth of pathogens tested, including highly resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Clostridioides difficile. Our results demonstrate that cannabidiol has excellent activity against biofilms, little propensity to induce resistance, and topical in vivo efficacy. Multiple mode-of-action studies point to membrane disruption as cannabidiol’s primary mechanism. More importantly, we now report for the first time that cannabidiol can selectively kill a subset of Gram-negative bacteria that includes the ‘urgent threat’ pathogen Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Structure-activity relationship studies demonstrate the potential to advance cannabidiol analogs as a much-needed new class of antibiotics.

3.

Background: Little is known about the long-term effects of high-deductible insurance on care for chronic medical conditions. Objective: To determine whether a transition from low-deductible to high-deductible insurance is associated with delayed medical care for macrovascular complications of diabetes. Design: Observational longitudinal comparison of matched groups. Setting: A large national health insurer during 2003 to 2012. Participants: The intervention group comprised 33 957 persons with diabetes who were continuously enrolled in low-deductible (≤$500) insurance plans during a baseline year followed by up to 4 years in high-deductible (≥$1000) plans. The control group included 294 942 persons with diabetes who were enrolled in low-deductible plans contemporaneously with matched intervention group members. Intervention: Employer-mandated transition to a high-deductible plan. Measurements: The number of months it took for persons in each study group to seek care for their first major macrovascular symptom, have their first major diagnostic test for macrovascular disease, and have their first major procedure-based treatment was determined. Between-group differences in time to reach a midpoint event rate were then calculated. Results: No baseline differences were found between groups. During follow-up, the delay for the high-deductible group was 1.5 months (95% CI, 0.8 to 2.3 months) for seeking care for the first major symptom, 1.9 months (CI, 1.4 to 2.3 months) for the first diagnostic test, and 3.1 months (CI, 0.5 to 5.8 months) for the first procedure-based treatment. Limitation: Health outcomes were not examined. Conclusion: Among persons with diabetes, mandated enrollment in a high-deductible insurance plan was associated with delays in seeking care for the first major symptoms of macrovascular disease, the first diagnostic test, and the first procedure-based treatment.

The optimal treatment strategy for stage IB2 cervical carcinoma that maximizes survival while minimizing toxicity remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare survival and toxicity in stage IB2 cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation and adjuvant extrafascial hysterectomy (cRT + H) versus definitive chemoradiation (cRT). Data were abstracted from patients with IB2 cervical carcinoma primarily treated at a single institution from January 1994 to December 2004. All patients received chemotherapy concurrent with external beam radiation therapy. Patients were subsequently treated with either a single low-dose rate brachytherapy applicator followed by adjuvant extrafascial hysterectomy (n = 24) or a second brachytherapy application to complete full-dose definitive chemoradiation (n = 30). Analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival and Chi-square statistics. Groups did not differ demographically with the exception of smoking. Smokers were significantly (P = 0.04) more likely to have been treated with definitive chemoradiation. Median tumor size was similar between groups. There was no difference in overall or disease-free survival between patients who received cRT + H versus cRT (P = 0.82 and 0.75, respectively). All recurrences in the cRT arm were in smokers. There were two grade 3-4 toxicities in each group. No treatment-related deaths occurred. In this small retrospective cohort study, we observed no difference in survival between patients treated with cRT + H versus cRT. These data complement published results of Gynecologic Oncology Group studies in patients with IB2 cervical cancer. Definitive comparison between the two treatment strategies would require a randomized prospective trial with stratification based on smoking.