Southern Australian breakup history is divisible into three phases. The first phase began with Callovian (c.159–165 Ma) rifting in the western Bight Basin. During the Tithonian (c.142–146 Ma), rifting extended eastwards into the Duntroon, Otway and Gippsland Basins. By the Valanginian (c.130–135 Ma), ocean crust formed between India and western Australia. Structural style in the western Bight changed to thermal subsidence. However, fluvio-lacustrine rift sedimentation continued in Duntroon, Otway and Gippsland until the Barremian (c.115–123 Ma) when these basins also changed to thermal subsidence. The diachronous progression of basin fill types produces a progressive shift in ages of potential source, seal and reservoir intervals along the margin.The second phase began during the Cenomanian (c.92–97.5 Ma) with uplift in eastern Australia, stress reorganisation and divergence of basin development. The Otway, Sorell and Great South Basins formed in a transtensional regime. These tectonics resulted in trap generation through faulting, inversion and wrenching. During the Santonian, oceanic spreading began in the southern Tasman Sea (c.85 Ma). Slow extension caused thinning of continental crust in the Bight and Otway Basins and subsidence into deeper water. Ocean crust formed south of the Bight Basin in the Early Campanian (c.83 Ma) and also started extending up the eastern Australian coast.The third stage in development was caused by Eocene changes to fast spreading in the Southern Ocean (c.44 Ma), final separation of Australia and Antarctica, and cessation of Tasman Sea spreading. These events caused collapse of continental margins and widespread marine transgression. The resultant loading, maturation and marine seal deposition are critical to petroleum prospectivity in the Gippsland Basin.

Aquaculture now supplies half of the fish consumed directly by humans. We evaluate whether aquaculture, given current patterns of production and distribution, supports the needs of poor and food-insecure populations throughout the world. We begin by identifying 41 seafood-reliant nutritionally vulnerable nations (NVNs), and ask whether aquaculture meets human nutritional demand directly via domestic production or trade, or indirectly via purchase of nutritionally rich dietary substitutes. We find that a limited number of NVNs have domestically farmed seafood, and of those, only specific aquaculture approaches (e.g., freshwater) in some locations have the potential to benefit nutritionally vulnerable populations. While assessment of aquaculture's direct contribution via trade is constrained by data limitations, we find that it is unlikely to contribute substantially to human nutrition in vulnerable groups, as most exported aquaculture consists of high-value species for international markets. We also determine that subpopulations who benefit from aquaculture profits are likely not the same subpopulations who are nutritionally vulnerable, and more research is needed to understand the impacts of aquaculture income gains. Finally, we discuss the relationship of aquaculture to existing trends in capture fisheries in NVNs, and suggest strategies to create lasting solutions to nutritional security, without exacerbating existing challenges in access to food and land resources.

No abstract

The U.S. aquaculture industry has experienced disruptions due to the global COVID‐19 pandemic. Responses from 537 U.S. aquaculture farms and businesses, collected through an online survey, revealed that the primary impact has been the disruption of traditional marketing channels. This has resulted in a cascade of effects, including the loss of revenue, consequences for farm labor, difficulty securing production inputs and services, and management challenges from on‐farm inventory of unsold fish/shellfish. Results from the Quarter 1 survey confirm that COVID‐19 has, and will continue to, negatively affect U.S. aquaculture for the duration of 2020, and possibly longer.

Baitfish producers have expressed interest in adopting the split-pond production system. However, confining fish to 20% of the pond area in split-pond systems effectively quintuples fish density within the culture unit as compared with densities in open ponds. Winter conditions are known to be relatively more stressful on smaller fish, and high densities within split-pond culture units could increase losses. A 139-d study was conducted during the winter to compare the production of golden shiners, Notemigonus crysoleucas, in traditional earthen ponds and split ponds at two densities. Golden shiners were stocked at 646 kg/ha or 1292 kg/ha (ca. 370,500 or 741,000 fish/ha, respectively) into 12, 0.04-ha, netted earthen ponds (six split ponds and six traditional). Feeding rate, nightly aeration hours, and daily circulation hours were reduced when water temperature decreased. At harvest, net yields were significantly lower in the split ponds as compared with traditional ponds at each density (53 and 113 kg/ha less in the lowand high-density split-pond treatments, respectively). Estimated survival was high (>87%) and did not differ among treatments. Results showed that, although net yield was reduced, small baitfish could be successfully overwintered in split-pond culture units in preparation for the spring crappie market. KEYWORDS baitfish, golden shiner, pond aquaculture, split pond, winter