UK Department of Health, Research in Real Life.

28Background Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption is a goal for the UK. Therefore, the 29

ObjectivesTo describe the uptake and outputs of the National Health Service Health Check (NHSHC) programme in England.DesignObservational study.SettingNational primary care data extracted directly by NHS Digital from 90% of general practices (GP) in England.ParticipantsIndividuals aged 40–74 years, invited to or completing a NHSHC between 2012 and 2017, defined using primary care Read codes.InterventionThe NHSHC, a structured assessment of non-communicable disease risk factors and 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, with recommendations for behavioural change support and therapeutic interventions.ResultsDuring the 5-year cycle, 9 694 979 individuals were offered an NHSHC and 5 102 758 (52.6%) took up the offer. There was geographical variation in uptake between local authorities across England ranging from 25.1% to 84.7%. Invitation methods changed over time to incorporate greater digitalisation, opportunistic delivery and delivery by third-party providers.The population offered an NHSHC resembled the English population in ethnicity and deprivation characteristics. Attendees were more likely to be older and women, but were similar in terms of ethnicity and deprivation, compared with non-attendees. Among attendees, risk factor prevalence reflected population survey estimates for England. Where a CVD risk score was documented, 25.9% had a 10-year CVD risk ≥10%, of which 20.3% were prescribed a statin. Advice, information and referrals were coded as delivered to over 2.5 million individuals identified to have risk factors.ConclusionThis national analysis of the NHSHC programme, using primary care data from over 9.5 million individuals offered a check, reveals an uptake rate of over 50% and no significant evidence of inequity by ethnicity or deprivation. To maximise the anticipated value of the NHSHC, we suggest continued action is needed to invite more eligible people for a check, reduce geographical variation in uptake, prioritise engagement with non-attendees and promote greater use of evidence-based interventions especially where risk is identified.

SummaryThis paper examines a brief preventive intervention as a model for embedding public health action in primary care. Background: Low fruit and vegetable intake is a major risk factor for cancer, coronary heart disease and stroke. The recommended intake of five portions per day would reduce death rates from these causes by 20%. However, average daily consumption in the UK is under three portions, and it is significantly lower in men, young people and lower socio-economic groups. In order to tackle risk factors such as poor diet, the white paper Choosing Health promises action and funding to mainstream prevention and transform the NHS from a sickness service to a genuine health service. The intervention: To promote increased fruit and vegetable consumption, primary care professionals working in a deprived area issue prescriptions which offer the patient discounts on fruit and vegetable purchases. Handover of each prescription to the patient is linked explicitly to key five a day messages. This brief intervention takes 1 -2 min to deploy. Immediate outcomes: Evaluation is ongoing. However, early feedback suggests that the intervention of prescription plus key messages has a significant impact on patients in highlighting the connection between food and health. Clinicians express satisfaction at having a preventive intervention that can be deployed with confidence and consistency in routine primary care consultations. Discussion: This brief intervention is presented as a potential model for embedding prevention in the day-to-day work of health professionals. Primary care is a natural setting for the promotion of health, but despite success in implementing some public health programmes, it has a patchy record in primary prevention. The reasons for this are examined, the impact of new contractual and commissioning levers is explored, and a general framework for mainstreaming public health action in primary care is proposed.

No abstract