Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been described as a common cardiovascular manifestation in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has been suggested to be a potential risk factor for a poor clinical outcome. Methods: In this observational study, all patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in 2020 in the Cantonal Hospital of Baden were included. We assessed clinical characteristics, in-hospital outcomes as well as long-term outcomes with a mean follow-up time of 278 (±90) days. Results: Amongst 646 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (59% male, median age: 70 (IQR: 59–80)) in 2020, a total of 177 (27.4%) patients were transferred to the intermediate/intensive care unit (IMC/ICU), and 76 (11.8%) were invasively ventilated during their hospitalization. Ninety patients (13.9%) died. A total of 116 patients (18%) showed AF on admission of which 34 (29%) had new-onset AF. Patients with COVID-19 and newly diagnosed AF were more likely to require invasive ventilation (OR: 3.5; p = 0.01) but did not encounter an increased in-hospital mortality. Moreover, AF neither increased long-term mortality nor the number of rehospitalizations during follow-up after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions: In patients suffering from COVID-19, the new-onset of AF on admission was associated with an increased risk of invasive ventilation and transfer to the IMC/ICU but did not affect in-hospital or long-term mortality.
Background Despite the widespread use of glucocorticoids in inflammatory and autoimmune disorders, there is uncertainty about the safe cessation of long-term systemic treatment, as data from prospective trials are largely missing. Due to potential disease relapse or glucocorticoid-induced hypocortisolism, the drug is often tapered to sub-physiological doses rather than stopped when the underlying disease is clinically stable, increasing the cumulative drug exposure. Conversely, the duration of exposure to glucocorticoids should be minimized to lower the risk of side effects. Methods We designed a multicenter, randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to test the clinical noninferiority of abrupt glucocorticoid stop compared to tapering after ≥28 treatment days with ≥420 mg cumulative and ≥7.5 mg mean daily prednisone-equivalent dose. 573 adult patients treated systemically for various disorders will be included after their underlying disease has been stabilized. Prednisone in tapering doses or matching placebo is administered over 4 weeks. A 250 mg ACTH-test, the result of which will be revealed a posteriori, is performed at study inclusion; all patients are instructed on glucocorticoid stress cover dosing. Follow-up is for 6 months. The composite primary outcome measure is time to hospitalization, death, initiation of unplanned systemic glucocorticoid therapy, or adrenal crisis. Secondary outcomes include the individual components of the primary outcome, cumulative glucocorticoid doses, signs and symptoms of hypocortisolism, and the performance of the ACTH test in predicting the clinical outcome. Cox proportional hazard, linear, and logistic regression models will be used for statistical analysis. Conclusion This trial aims to demonstrate the clinical noninferiority and safety of abrupt treatment cessation after ≥28 days of systemic glucocorticoid therapy in patients with stabilized underlying disease. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03153527; EUDRA-CT: 2020–005601–48 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03153527?term=NCT03153527&draw=2&rank=1.
Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been described as a common cardiovascular manifestation in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and is discussed to be a potential risk factor for a poor clinical course. AF is also already known to be associated with increased risk for all cause death. Purpose In the present study we sought to investigate the impact of AF on the clinical trajectory of patients suffering from COVID-19. Methods We included all patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 in 2020 in our Hospital. A poor clinical trajectory was defined as transfer to intensive care unit (ICU), intermediate care unit (IMC) or death from any cause. Initial ECGs were analyzed in consensus by two experienced readers. First, we compared patients with poor clinical trajectory vs. good clinical course. Secondly, the study population was categorized into two groups with or without AF on admission. A subgroup analysis was performed to differentiate between new onset AF and patients with known history of AF. To compensate for confounders (age, BMI, known cardiomyopathy (CMP), known coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic airway disease, renal insufficiency, diabetes, arterial hypertension and sex), a full clinically validated multiple logistic regression model with poor clinical trajectory as dependent target variable was performed. Results From our enrolled 666 patients in 2020 (58% male, average age: 66 (IQR:58–80)) 223 patients (33.5%) experienced a poor clinical course. 179 (27%) patients were transferred to IMC/ICU and 86 (13%) patients died. All in all, patients with poor clinical trajectory were more frequently male (70% vs. 52%; P<0.001), older (71±14 vs. 64±20; P<0.001) and had significantly more co-morbidities such as CAD, CMP, hypertension and diabetes in comparison to patients with a good clinical course. 96 (14.4%) had AF on admission. Among these 37.5% had new-onset AF, which showed similar baseline characteristics as patients without AF. Indeed, patients with COVID-19 and new onset AF were more likely to die (25% vs 12%; P=0.038), or be in need for ICU/IMC (25% vs. 62%; P<0.001) and therefore experienced a poor clinical trajectory more frequently (75% vs. 31%; P<0.001) with a confounder adjusted OR of 5.89. In the subgroup analysis of all patients with AF on admission. Patients with new onset of AF had significantly more underlying CMP, Diabetes and chronic airways disease. While mortality was not higher in patients with new onset of AF, IMC/ICU transfers (62% vs 24%; P<0.001) and as a result poor clinical trajectory (75% vs 40%; P=0.001) was significantly increased in comparison to patients with known AF. Conclusion In patients suffering from COVID-19, new onset of AF on admission was associated with a poor clinical course and higher in-hospital mortality. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.