To cite this version:M. Merad, E. de Montalivet, M. Legrand, E. Mastinu, M. Ortiz-Catalan, et al.. Assessment of an automatic prosthetic elbow control strategy using residual limb motion for transhumeral amputated individuals with socket or osseointegrated prostheses.Abstract-Most transhumeral amputated individuals deplore the lack of functionality of their prosthesis due to control-related limitations. Commercialized prosthetic elbows are controlled via myoelectric signals, yielding complex control schemes when users have to control an entire prosthetic limb. Limited control yields the development of compensatory strategies. An alternative control strategy associates residual limb motions to automatize the prosthetic elbow motion using a model of physiological shoulder/elbow synergies. Preliminary studies have shown that elbow motion could be predicted from residual limb kinematic measurements, but results with transhumeral amputated individuals were lacking. This study focuses on the experimental assessment of automatic prosthetic elbow control during a reaching task, compared to conventional myoelectric control, with six transhumeral amputated individuals, among whom, three had an osseointegrated device. Part of the recruited participants had an osseointegrated prosthetic device. The task was achieved within physiological precision errors with both control modes. Automatic elbow control reduced trunk compensations, and restored a physiologically-like shoulder/elbow movement synchronization. However, the kinematic assessment showed that amputation and prosthesis wear modifies the shoulder movements in comparison with physiological shoulder kinematics. Overall, participants described the automatic elbow control strategy as intuitive, and this work highlights the interest of automatized prosthetic elbow motion.
To control the robotic joints of an upper limb prosthesis, most existing approaches rely on decoding the user motor intention from electrophysiological signals produced by the subject, and then executing the desired movement. This suffers from important limitations and requires extended training, particularly when a large number of prosthetic joints have to be controlled. Even when they master the control of their prosthesis, many amputees underuse the prosthetic mobility to the benefit of compensatory body movements, whose generation is less expensive and more natural from a cognitive point of view. Indeed, with an arm prosthesis, hand movements result from a combination of human and robotic joint motions. We propose in this paper to use these compensatory motions as an error signal to servo the robotic controller. This approach thus creates a coupling between body compensations and prosthetic movements.To study the feasibility of such a coupling, the concept is tested with ten able-bodied subjects wearing an emulated elbow prosthesis and one congenital arm amputee. The results validate the concept, which allows naive subjects to control the prosthetic joint with no or very short training period.Index Terms-Physical human-robot interaction, prosthetics and exoskeletons, human-in-the-loop and body compensations.
Due to the limitations of myoelectric control (such as dependence on muscular fatigue and on electrodes shift, difficulty in decoding complex patterns or in dealing with simultaneous movements), there is a renewal of interest in the movement-based control approaches for prosthetics. The latter use residual limb movements rather than muscular activity as command inputs, in order to develop more natural and intuitive control techniques. Among those, several research works rely on the interjoint coordinations that naturally exist in human upper limb movements. These relationships are modeled to control the distal joints (e.g., elbow) based on the motions of proximal ones (e.g., shoulder). The regression techniques, used to model the coordinations, are various [Artificial Neural Networks, Principal Components Analysis (PCA), etc.] and yet, analysis of their performance and impact on the prosthesis control is missing in the literature. Is there one technique really more efficient than the others to model interjoint coordinations? To answer this question, we conducted an experimental campaign to compare the performance of three common regression techniques in the control of the elbow joint on a transhumeral prosthesis. Ten non-disabled subjects performed a reaching task, while wearing an elbow prosthesis which was driven by several interjoint coordination models obtained through different regression techniques. The models of the shoulder-elbow kinematic relationship were built from the recordings of fifteen different non-disabled subjects that performed a similar reaching task with their healthy arm. Among Radial Basis Function Networks (RBFN), Locally Weighted Regression (LWR), and PCA, RBFN was found to be the most robust, based on the analysis of several criteria including the quality of generated movements but also the compensatory strategies exhibited by users. Yet, RBFN does not significantly outperform LWR and PCA. The regression technique seems not to be the most significant factor for improvement of interjoint coordinations-based control. By characterizing the impact of the modeling techniques through closed-loop experiments with human users instead of purely offline simulations, this work could also help in improving movement-based control approaches and in bringing them closer to a real use by patients.
Controlling several joints simultaneously is a common feature of natural arm movements. Robotic prostheses shall offer this possibility to their wearer. Yet, existing approaches to control a robotic upper-limb prosthesis from myoelectric interfaces do not satisfactorily respond to this need: standard methods provide sequential jointby-joint motion control only; advanced pattern recognitionbased approaches allow the control of a limited subset of synchronized multi-joint movements and remain complex to set up. In this paper, we exploit a control method of an upper-limb prosthesis based on body motion measurement called Compensations Cancellation Control (CCC). It offers a straightforward simultaneous control of the intermediate joints, namely the wrist and the elbow. Four transhumeral amputated participants performed the Refined Rolyan Clothespin Test with an experimental prosthesis alternatively running CCC and conventional joint-by-joint myoelectric control. Task performance, joint motions, body compensations and cognitive load were assessed. This experiment shows that CCC restores simultaneity between prosthetic joints while maintaining the level of performance of conventional myoelectric control (used on a daily basis by three participants), without increasing compensatory motions nor cognitive load.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.