na integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta e duas testemunhas em monocultivo (eucalipto e acácia). A altura das árvores de eucalipto é influenciada pelo consórcio com acácia nos arranjos estudados na ILPF, o que não acontece com o diâmetro à altura do peito. O arranjo das espécies de eucalipto e acácia consorciados na mesma linha de plantio possui produtividade igual ao arranjo, utilizando apenas eucalipto nas linhas de plantio em sistemas de ILPF. A produtividade de madeira de eucalipto no arranjo de eucalipto e acácia na mesma linha da ILPF é menor do que em cultivo sozinho na linha, porém, a soma da madeira produzida pelas duas espécies é superior ao arranjo de apenas eucalipto na linha de plantio da ILPF. PRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR OF EUCALYPTUS AND ACACIA, IN DIFFERENT ARRANGEMENTS OF CROP-LIVESTOCK-FOREST INTEGRATION ABSTRACT:The objective was to evaluate initial growth of clonal Eucalyptus, hybrid Eucalyptus grandis x E. urophylla and Acacia (Acacia mangium) trees in alternate and not alternate rows of trees, intercropped with forage (crop-livestock-forest integration -CLFI) and monoculture. The design was a randomized complete block design with four replications, three arboreal arrangements consisting of eucalyptus, acacia + eucalyptus, acacia, all planted in crop-livestock-forest integration and two monoculture controls (Eucalyptus and Acacia). The height of eucalyptus trees is influenced by the consortium with Acacia in the studied CLFI designs, which does not happen with the diameter at breast height. The arrangement of species of eucalyptus and acacia intercropping in the same row planting has productivity equal to the array using only the lines of eucalyptus planting systems . Timber productivity of acacia and eucalyptus in the same row is less than the same species line, however, the sum of the timber produced from the two species is greater than the arrangement of eucalyptus only row in CLFI.

Light intensity available in growing environments may influence the susceptibility of plants to glyphosate and decomposition of their residues. This study aimed to assess the productivity, control, and decomposition of forage straw submitted to glyphosate doses and exposed to full sun and 50% shade. Two experiments were carried out, one for Piatã grass (Urochloa brizantha cv. Piatã) and other for Tanzania grass (Megathyrsus maximus cv. Tanzania). The experimental design was a randomized block design with strip-plot and four replications. Two growing environments (at full sun and under 50% shade) were installed in strips in the growing area, combined with six doses of glyphosate (0, 360, 720, 1,080, 1,440, and 1,800 g a.e. ha-1) used for forage desiccation. Shade did not change Tanzania grass productivity (p<0.05), but it reduced Piatã grass productivity (p>0.05), suggesting its low tolerance to light restriction. Tanzania grass is more tolerant to glyphosate when compared to Piatã grass, especially at full sun conditions. In general, the evaluated forages present a high susceptibility to glyphosate as incident radiation is reduced, which allows using lower doses to desiccate them in shaded environments. Straw decomposition of Piatã and Tanzania grasses was slower under shading. In this environment with light restriction, straw is more durable and has a better quality for the no-tillage system.