No abstract

We consider the classical tree edit distance between ordered labelled trees, which is defined as the minimum-cost sequence of node edit operations that transform one tree into another. The state-of-the-art solutions for the tree edit distance are not satisfactory. The main competitors in the field either have optimal worst-case complexity but the worst case happens frequently, or they are very efficient for some tree shapes but degenerate for others. This leads to unpredictable and often infeasible runtimes. There is no obvious way to choose between the algorithms. In this article we present RTED, a robust tree edit distance algorithm. The asymptotic complexity of our algorithm is smaller than or equal to the complexity of the best competitors for any input instance, that is, our algorithm is both efficient and worst-case optimal. This is achieved by computing a dynamic decomposition strategy that depends on the input trees. RTED is shown optimal among all algorithms that use LRH ( left-right-heavy ) strategies, which include RTED and the fastest tree edit distance algorithms presented in literature. In our experiments on synthetic and real-world data we empirically evaluate our solution and compare it to the state-of-the-art.

Although many works in the database community use open data in their experimental evaluation, repeating the empirical results of previous works remains a challenge. This holds true even if the source code or binaries of the tested algorithms are available. In this paper, we argue that providing access to the raw, original datasets is not enough. Real-world datasets are rarely processed without modification. Instead, the data is adapted to the needs of the experimental evaluation in the data preparation process. We showcase that the details of the data preparation process matter and subtle differences during data conversion can have a large impact on the outcome of runtime results. We introduce a data reproducibility model, identify three levels of data reproducibility, report about our own experience, and exemplify our best practices.

The tree edit distance (TED), defined as the minimum-cost sequence of node operations that transform one tree into another, is a well-known distance measure for hierarchical data. Thanks to its intuitive definition, TED has found a wide range of diverse applications like software engineering, natural language processing, and bioinformatics. The state-of-the-art algorithms for TED recursively decompose the input trees into smaller subproblems and use dynamic programming to build the result in a bottom-up fashion. The main line of research deals with efficient implementations of a recursive solution introduced by Zhang in the late 1980s. Another more recent recursive solution by Chen found little attention. Its relation to the other TED solutions has never been studied and it has never been empirically tested against its competitors. In this paper we fill the gap and revisit Chen's TED algorithm. We analyse the recursion by Chen and compare it to Zhang's recursion. We show that all subproblems generated by Chen can also origin from Zhang's decomposition. This is interesting since new algorithms that combine the features of both recursive solutions could be developed. Moreover, we revise the runtime complexity of Chen's algorithm and develop a new traversal strategy to reduce its memory complexity. Finally, we provide the first experimental evaluation of Chen's algorithm and identify tree shapes for which Chen's solution is a promising competitor.

We consider the classical tree edit distance between ordered labeled trees, which is defined as the minimum-cost sequence of node edit operations that transform one tree into another. The state-of-the-art solutions for the tree edit distance are not satisfactory. The main competitors in the field either have optimal worst-case complexity, but the worst case happens frequently, or they are very efficient for some tree shapes, but degenerate for others. This leads to unpredictable and often infeasible runtimes. There is no obvious way to choose between the algorithms. In this paper we present RTED, a robust tree edit distance algorithm. The asymptotic complexity of RTED is smaller or equal to the complexity of the best competitors for any input instance, i.e., RTED is both efficient and worst-case optimal. We introduce the class of LRH (Left-Right-Heavy) algorithms, which includes RTED and the fastest tree edit distance algorithms presented in literature. We prove that RTED outperforms all previously proposed LRH algorithms in terms of runtime complexity. In our experiments on synthetic and real world data we empirically evaluate our solution and compare it to the state-of-the-art.