No abstract

Swelling, shrinking, and subsequent low strength of expansive soil poses significant damage to structures if it is considered as foundation or fill material. Recently, the use of cement has become very prevalent in stabilizing these problematic soils owing to its effectiveness. However, the swelling potential of expansive soil is not always adequately resolved by cement. The presence of sulfate salts aggravates the situation impairing the effectiveness of cement, leading to the need to reassess its performance. In this study, the effectiveness of different stabilizers was investigated in stabilizing high-plasticity soil. Two types of soil with variable sulfate content were treated with slag, Type I/II, and Type V Portland cement, and their performances were evaluated based on Atterberg limits, pH, unconfined compression, and volumetric swell tests. A total of 312 samples were prepared for 18 different soil–stabilizer blends tested after 7, 28, and 90 days of curing period. Laboratory test results indicated that strength gain performance was attenuated and swelling potential increased due to the presence of sulfate salts. Adding stabilizers improved the strength of soils by a factor of 4–10 and decreased the swelling potential to < 1%. Atterberg limits decreased initially and then slightly increased with the increase of additive dosages. Additives increased the pH up to a maximum value of 11–12, which could be used as an indicator of target stabilizer addition rate. Finally, slag improved the performance of cement significantly and has proven to be a better option for treating high sulfate expansive soils.

No abstract

No abstract