BackgroundThe available evidence on the role of obesity and body mass index (BMI) on male infertility has been controversial or inconclusive to some extent.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the role of BMI on some male-fertility laboratory indicators both among infertile and fertile men in an Iranian population.Methods and materialsA total of 159 male patients who had lived as a partner in an infertile couple for at least 1 year, after regular reproductive activity in their married life, and who sought infertility consultation, were investigated. BMI was assessed, and a morning blood sample was taken assessing serum levels of testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, prolactin, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone, and estradiol. Semen-analysis parameters were also measured.ResultsIn this study, it was found that the likelihood of oligospermia was increased at higher BMI values. Obese men were found to be 3.5 times more likely to have oligospermia than those with normal BMI. BMI was not found to be associated with mean numeric values of the semen-analysis parameters, including sperm count, sperm morphology, and sperm motility. BMI was not significantly correlated with some hormone levels, such as LH, prolactin, and LH/follicle-stimulating hormone ratio. However, a statistically significant association was observed between BMI and estradiol (P < 0.01), sex hormone-binding globulin (P < 0.001), and also the testosterone/estradiol ratio (P < 0.001). A different pattern of associations in this study was observed when the associations between BMI and sexual hormone levels were compared between fertile and subfertile/infertile men.ConclusionThe association explored between BMI and some sexual hormones and semen characteristics, as well as different patterns of this association between fertile and subfertile/infertile men, will be of help to broaden our understanding of the effect of obesity on some male reproductive physiologic characteristics among fertile and infertile men.

Objective Infertile couples perceive some needs and expectations during treatment. Most studies have focused on infertile women’s needs. The study was done to explore the expectations of men who undergoing in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Participants were men whose wives undergo IVF treatment in the IVF clinic of Shahid Motahhri hospital in Urmia. Purposive sampling was performed and data collection was done through in-depth semi-structured interviews until data saturation. Results “Supportive care” was emerged as the main theme consisted of two categories. The first category was “to be treated with attention in healthcare setting” which included three subcategories: Receiving couple based care, establishing counseling centers, and continuous care. The second category was “to be welcomed in the society” which included two subcategories: Financial support from community and close family, and changing community views about IVF treatment. Expectations of men undergoing IVF focuses on supportive care. They seek to receive the kind of care from health care setting and society. A deep understanding of the needs could help practitioners to consider men’s expectations, and assist policy makers and researchers to design and implement interventions and programs in infertility clinics which enhance the partnership of infertile men and fulfill their expectations.

Background: The correlation between high estradiol (E2) levels induced by controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and pregnancy is controversial. Objective: To assess the effect of serum E2 levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration on the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. Materials and Methods: The current study included 551 participants who had undergone ICSI between May 2014 and May 2016. Based on E2 levels, the individuals aged < 37 yr (n = 502) and 37-42 yr (n = 49) were categorized into six and three groups, respectively. ICSI outcomes including the number of retrieved oocytes (NRO), number of embryos (NE), pregnancy rate, and abortion rate were analyzed in both groups. Results: Among participants aged < 37 yr, the NRO and NE were 8.69 ± 3.82 and 5.24 ± 2.32, respectively and they had a significant correlation with the E2 level on human chorionic gonadotropin administration day (p < 0.001 for both). Among participants aged > 37 yr, NRO and NE were 5.18 ± 3.17 and 3.40 ± 2.23, respectively, and the NRO (p < 0.001), NE (p < 0.001), pregnancy rate (p < 0.001), abortion rate (p = 0.007), and the number of grade A and B embryos (p = 0.003) had a significant association with the E2 level. Conclusion: COH is a costly procedure that may have negative effects on endometrial receptivity. Thus, in order to prevent these effects and also to reduce the costs of COH, we recommend gaining optimum number of oocytes rather than maximum number during the procedure. Key words: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, In vitro fertilization, Estradiol, Pregnancy.

"Introduction: One of the methods utilized to treat infertility is the use of frozen embryos. This technique is particularly employed in patients with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), which leads to heightened blood estrogen levels. The purpose of this study was to compare the percentage of pregnancy and abortion between patients who used the frozen embryo method due to OHSS and others who practiced the same method for other reasons. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, cohort study was conducted on a total of 338 patients who visited in vitro fertilization (IVF) section of Kowsar Hospital of Urmia-Iran to employ the frozen embryo method (May 2013 to December 2015). The patients were classified into two groups, i.e. the OHSS group (N=150) and the non-OHSS group (N=188). Data were obtained and examined by evaluating the files in a questionnaire. Results: The two groups did not differ significantly with regard to their mean age (p = 0.57). There was also no statistically significant difference between the OHSS and non-OHSS groups regarding the quality of frozen embryo transferred (P = 0.17). Also, there was also no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of their pregnancy rate (OHSS = 30.0% vs. non-OHSS = 25.0%) and miscarriage rate (OHSS = 31.11% vs. non-OHSS = 24.44%) (p = 0.32 and p = 0.31, respectively). Conclusion: Ovum exposure to high estrogen during ovulation stimulation does not affect embryo implantation and miscarriage in patients with OHSS."

.