Progressively decreasing glomerular filtration rate (GFR), or renal decline, is seen in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuria. Here we examined the associations of kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) in plasma and urine with the risk of renal decline and determine whether those associations are independent of markers of glomerular damage. The study group comprised patients with T1D from the 2nd Joslin Kidney Study of which 259 had normoalbuminuria and 203 had microalbuminuria. Serial measurements over 4 to 10 years of follow-up (median 8 years) of serum creatinine and cystatin C were used jointly to estimate eGFRcr-cys slopes and time of onset of CKD stage 3 or higher. Baseline urinary excretion of IgG2 and albumin were used as markers of glomerular damage, and urinary excretion of KIM-1 and its plasma concentration were used as markers of proximal tubular damage. All patients had normal renal function at baseline. During follow-up, renal decline (eGFRcr-cys loss 3.3% or more per year) developed in 96 patients and 62 progressed to CKD stage 3. For both outcomes, the risk rose with increasing baseline levels of plasma KIM-1. In multivariable models, elevated baseline plasma KIM-1 was strongly associated with risk of early progressive renal decline, regardless of baseline clinical characteristics, serum TNFR1 or markers of glomerular damage. Thus, damage to proximal tubules may play an independent role in the development of early progressive renal decline in non-proteinuric patients with T1D.
In recent years, a concept of renal rehabilitation has become widely known among nephrology specialists, dialysis specialists, kidney transplantation specialists, rehabilitation specialists, nutrition specialists, guideline specialists, nurses, physiotherapists, and representatives of patients. Therefore, in order to make it clear the definition, methods, and effectiveness of renal rehabilitation in Japan, we launched Renal Rehabilitation Guideline Preparation Committee in 2016 as a part of works in the Japanese Society of Renal Rehabilitation, and created a guideline in accordance to the "Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014". Here, we report systematic reviews and recommendations of exercise therapies in patients with kidney diseases based on the guideline preparation committee works. Six recommendations for the condition of each kidney disorder, groups addressing nephritis/nephrosis, chronic kidney diseases, dialysis therapy, and kidney transplantation were created. All the recommendation grades were determined by a consensus conference participated in by representatives of patients and various professionals. The purpose of this report is to provide an evidence-based, best practice summary to optimize the quality, safety and efficacy, and availability of renal rehabilitation service, and to provide care for maximum patient prognosis, quality of life, and satisfaction.
BackgroundA new classification of diabetic nephropathy was reported by Tervaert et al., but the association between pathological findings and the clinical outcomes remains unclear.MethodsAmong 310 patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent renal biopsy from March 1985 to January 2010 and were confirmed to have diabetic nephropathy according to the Tervaert's classification, 205 patients were enrolled in this study. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for death-censored renal death. Each regression analysis employed two levels of multivariate adjustment.ResultsAfter adjustment for age, gender, estimated glomerular filtration rate, type of diabetes, urinary protein excretion, systolic blood pressure, body mass index, HbA1c, diabetic retinopathy and red blood cells in urinary sediment at the time of renal biopsy, compared with glomerular class IIA, the HRs for death-censored renal death of glomerular classes I, IIB, III and IV were 0.21 (95% CI: 0.04–1.25), 2.12 (0.89–5.04), 4.23 (1.80–9.90), and 3.27 (1.32–8.10), respectively. Also, compared with an interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score 1 group, HRs for score 0 group, score 2 group and score 3 group were 0.08 (0.01–0.57), 2.17 (0.96–4.91), 4.78 (1.96–11.68), respectively.ConclusionsThe progression of glomerular, tubulointerstitial and vascular lesions was associated with higher HRs for renal death. These results suggest the clinical utility of Tervaert's pathological classification.
To identify determinants of early progressive renal decline in type 2 diabetes a range of markers was studied in 1032 patients enrolled into the 2nd Joslin Kidney Study. eGFR slopes estimated from serial measurements of serum creatinine during 5-12 years of follow-up were used to define early renal decline. At enrollment, all patients had normal eGFR, 58% had normoalbuminuria and 42% had albuminuria. Early renal decline developed in 6% and in 18% patients, respectively. As determinants, we examined baseline values of clinical characteristics, circulating markers: TNFR1, KIM-1, and FGF23, and urinary markers: albumin, KIM-1, NGAL, MCP-1, EGF (all normalized to urinary creatinine) and the ratio of EGF to MCP-1. In univariate analysis, all plasma and urinary markers were significantly associated with risk of early renal decline. When analyzed together, systolic blood pressure, TNFR1, KIM-1, the albumin to creatinine ratio, and the EGF/MCP-1 ratio remained significant with the latter having the strongest effect. Integration of these markers into a multi-marker prognostic test resulted in a significant improvement of discriminatory performance of risk prediction of early renal decline, compared with the albumin to creatinine ratio and systolic blood pressure alone. However, the positive predictive value was only 50% in albuminuric patients. Thus, markers in plasma and urine indicate that the early progressive renal decline in Type 2 diabetes has multiple determinants with strong evidence for involvement of tubular damage. However, new, more informative markers are needed to develop a better prognostic test for such decline that can be used in a clinical setting.
Background and objectives Some biomarkers of renal tubular injury are reported to be useful for predicting renal prognosis in the early stage of diabetic nephropathy (DN). Our study compared predictions of the renal prognosis by such biomarkers and by histologic tubulointerstitial damage.Design, setting, participants, & measurements Among 210 patients with type 2 diabetes and biopsy-proven DN managed from 1985 to 2011, 149 patients with urinary N-acetyl-b-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and urinary b2-microglobulin (b2-MG) data at the time of renal biopsy were enrolled. The primary outcome was a decline in eGFR of $50% from baseline or commencement of dialysis for ESRD.Results The median follow-up period was 2.3 years (interquartile range, 1.1-5.3), and the primary outcome was noted in 94 patients. Mean eGFR was 46.3623.2 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , and 132 patients (89%) had overt proteinuria at baseline. Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that the association of urinary NAG and b2-MG with the outcome was attenuated after adjustment for known promoters of progression (+1 SD for log NAG: hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.84 to 1.55; +1 SD for log b2-MG: HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.62). In contrast, the interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) score was still significantly correlated with the outcome after adjustment for the same covariates (+1 for IFTA score: HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.56 to 3.43). Moreover, adding the IFTA score to a model containing known progression indicators improved prediction of the outcome (increase of concordance index by 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.05; category-free net reclassification improvement by 0.54; 95% CI, 0.03 to 1.05; and relative integrated discrimination improvement by 0.07; 95% CI, 20.08 to 0.22).Conclusions Adding urinary NAG and b2-MG excretion to known promoters of progression did not improve prognostication, whereas adding the IFTA score did. The IFTA score may be superior to these tubulointerstitial markers for predicting the renal prognosis in advanced DN.
OBJECTIVEClinicopathological characteristics, renal prognosis, and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and reduced renal function without overt proteinuria are scarce. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe retrospectively assessed 526 patients with type 2 diabetes and reduced renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), who underwent clinical renal biopsy and had follow-up data, from Japan's nationwide multicenter renal biopsy registry. For comparative analyses, we derived oneto-two cohorts of those without proteinuria versus those with proteinuria using propensity score-matching methods addressing the imbalances of age, sex, diabetes duration, and baseline eGFR. The primary end point was progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) defined as new-onset end-stage renal disease, decrease of eGFR by ‡50%, or doubling of serum creatinine. The secondary end point was all-cause mortality. RESULTS Eighty-two patients with nonproteinuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR]<300 mg/g) had lower systolic blood pressure and less severe pathological lesions compared with 164 propensity score-matched patients with proteinuria (UACR ‡300 mg/g). After a median follow-up of 1.9 years (interquartile range 0.9-5.0 years) from the date of renal biopsy, the 5-year CKD progression-free survival was 86.6% (95% CI 72.5-93.8) for the nonproteinuric group and 30.3% (95% CI 22.4-38.6) for the proteinuric group (log-rank test P < 0.001). The lower renal risk was consistent across all subgroup analyses. The all-cause mortality was also lower in the nonproteinuric group (log-rank test P 5 0.005). CONCLUSIONSPatients with nonproteinuric diabetic kidney disease had better-controlled blood pressure and fewer typical morphological changes and were at lower risk of CKD progression and all-cause mortality.
Acute cyst hemorrhage and infection can be identified from symptoms, laboratory data, and CT/MRI findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.