Purpose Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) utilizes many small fields for producing a uniform dose distribution. Therefore, there are many field junctions in the target region, and resulting dose uncertainties are accumulated. However, such accumulation of the dose uncertainty has not been implemented in the current practice of IMRT dose verification. The purpose of this study is to develop a method to predict the gamma passing rate (GPR) using a dose uncertainty accumulation model. Methods Thirty‐three intensity‐modulated (IM) beams for head‐and‐neck cases with step‐and‐shoot techniques were used in this study. The treatment plan was created using the XiO treatment planning system (TPS). The IM beam was produced by the ONCOR Impression Plus linear accelerator. MapCHECK was used to measure the dose distribution. The distribution of a dose uncertainty potential (DUP) was generated by in‐house software that accumulated field shapes weighted by a segmental monitor unit, followed by Gaussian folding. The width of the Gaussian was determined from the width of the lateral penumbra. The dose difference between the calculated and measured doses was compared with the estimated DUP at each point. The GPR of each beam was predicted for 2%/2‐mm, 3%/2‐mm, and 3%/3‐mm tolerances by its own DUP histogram and a GPR‐vs‐DUP correlation of other beams using the leave‐one‐out cross‐validation method. The predicted GPR was compared with the measured GPR to evaluate the performance of this prediction method. The criteria for the predicted GPR corresponding to a measured GPR ≥ 90% were estimated to examine the feasibility of estimating the measured GPR by this GPR prediction method. Results The DUP was confirmed to have proportionality to the standard deviation (SD) of the dose difference. The SDs of the difference between the measured and predicted GPRs were 3.1, 1.7, and 1.4% for 2%/2‐mm, 3%/2‐mm, and 3%/3‐mm tolerances, respectively. The criteria of the predicted GPR corresponding to the measured GPR ≥ 90% were 94.1 and 95.0% with confidence levels of 99 and 99.9%, respectively. Conclusion In this study, we confirmed the good proportionality between the dose difference and the estimated DUP. The results showed a feasibility to predict the dose difference from DUP as estimated by a DUP accumulation model. The predicted GPR developed in this study showed good accuracy for planar dose distributions of head and neck IMRT. The prediction method developed in this study is considered to be feasible as a substitute for the current practice of measurement‐based verification of the dose distribution with gamma analysis.
A proton computed tomography (pCT) imaging system was constructed for evaluation of the error of an x-ray CT (xCT)-to-WEL (water-equivalent length) conversion in treatment planning for proton therapy. In this system, the scintillation light integrated along the beam direction is obtained by photography using the CCD camera, which enables fast and easy data acquisition. The light intensity is converted to the range of the proton beam using a light-to-range conversion table made beforehand, and a pCT image is reconstructed. An experiment for demonstration of the pCT system was performed using a 70 MeV proton beam provided by the AVF930 cyclotron at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences. Three-dimensional pCT images were reconstructed from the experimental data. A thin structure of approximately 1 mm was clearly observed, with spatial resolution of pCT images at the same level as that of xCT images. The pCT images of various substances were reconstructed to evaluate the pixel value of pCT images. The image quality was investigated with regard to deterioration including multiple Coulomb scattering.
Range uncertainty is among the most formidable challenges associated with the treatment planning of proton therapy. Proton imaging, which includes proton radiography and proton computed tomography (pCT), is a useful verification tool. We have developed a pCT detection system that uses a thick bismuth germanium oxide (BGO) scintillator and a CCD camera. The current method is based on a previous detection system that used a plastic scintillator, and implements improved image processing techniques. In the new system, the scintillation light intensity is integrated along the proton beam path by the BGO scintillator, and acquired as a two-dimensional distribution with the CCD camera. The range of a penetrating proton is derived from the integrated light intensity using a light-to-range conversion table, and a pCT image can be reconstructed. The proton range in the BGO scintillator is shorter than in the plastic scintillator, so errors due to extended proton ranges can be reduced. To demonstrate the feasibility of the pCT system, an experiment was performed using a 70 MeV proton beam created by the AVF930 cyclotron at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences. The accuracy of the light-to-range conversion table, which is susceptible to errors due to its spatial dependence, was investigated, and the errors in the acquired pixel values were less than 0.5 mm. Images of various materials were acquired, and the pixel-value errors were within 3.1%, which represents an improvement over previous results. We also obtained a pCT image of an edible chicken piece, the first of its kind for a biological material, and internal structures approximately one millimeter in size were clearly observed. This pCT imaging system is fast and simple, and based on these findings, we anticipate that we can acquire 200 MeV pCT images using the BGO scintillator system.
In proton therapy, positron emitter nuclei are generated via the target nuclear fragmentation reactions between irradiated proton and nuclei constituting a human body. The proton-irradiated volume can be confirmed with measurement of annihilation γ-rays from the generated positron emitter nuclei. To achieve the high accuracy of proton therapy, in vivo dosimetry i.e., evaluation of the irradiated dose during the treatment is important. To convert the measured activity distribution to irradiated dose, cross section data for positron emitter production is necessary, which is currently insufficient in the treatment area. The purpose of this study is to collect cross section data of 12 C(p, pn) 11 C and 12 C(p, p2n) 10 C reactions between the incident proton and carbon nuclei, which are important target nuclear fragmentation reactions, to estimate the range and exposure dose distribution in the patient's body. Using Planar-type PET capable of measuring annihilation γ-rays at high positional resolution and thick polyethylene target, we measured cross section data in continuous wide energy range. The cross section of 12 C(p, pn) 11 C is in good agreement with existing experimental data. The cross section of 12 C(p, p2n) 10 C is reported for the first data in the low energy range of 67.6-10.5 MeV near the Bragg-peak of proton beam.
The accuracy of the raw-data-based Z values was higher than that of image-based Z values in the tissue-equivalent phantom. The accuracy of Z values in the contrast medium was in good agreement within the maximum SD found in the iodine concentration range of clinical dynamic CT imaging. Moreover, the optimum monochromatic energy for human tissue and iodinated contrast medium was found to be 70 keV. Advances in knowledge: The accuracy of the Z values and monochromatic CT numbers of the contrast medium created by raw-data-based, dual-energy CT could be sufficient in clinical conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.