Oral mucositis is frequent but serious adverse event associated with radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy in head and neck cancer severely impairs health-related quality of life, leading to poor prognosis due to discontinuation of the therapy. Although a number of compounds have been tested for prophylaxis of oral mucositis, few of them are satisfactory. We investigated the effect of polaprezinc (zinc L-carnosine), a gastric mucosal protective drug, on radiochemotherapy-induced oral mucositis, pain, xerostomia and taste disturbance in patients with head and neck cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive polaprezinc (n 5 16) or azulene oral rinse as the control (n 5 15). The incidence rates of mucositis, pain, xerostomia and taste disturbance were all markedly lower in polaprezinc group than in control. Moreover, the use of analgesics was significantly (p 5 0.003) less frequent and the amount of food intake was significantly (p 5 0.002) higher in polaprezinc group than in control. On the other hand, tumor response rate in patients with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was not significantly affected by polaprezinc, in which the response rate (complete plus partial response) was 88% for polaprezinc and 92% for control (p 5 1.000). Therefore, it is highly assumable that polaprezinc is potentially useful for prevention of oral mucositis and improvement of quality of life without reducing the tumor response.
We showed evidence for the effectiveness of premedication with laxatives for prevention of opioid-induced constipation. However, premedication with dopamine D2 blockers was not sufficient to prevent nausea or vomiting.
When free radical-scavenging activities of quercetin, alpha-tocopherol, nifedipine and tetracycline were measured by an electron spin resonance technique, all test compounds (10(-5) to 10(-3) M) scavenged both superoxide anions and hydroxyl radicals. The oral administration of quercetin (50 and 100 mg/kg), alpha-tocopherol (8 and 16 mg/kg), nifedipine (20 and 40 mg/kg) or tetracycline (10 and 20 mg/kg) markedly prevented the HCl plus ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury and the increase in the content of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances in the injured mucosa in rats. In addition, quercetin (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg), alpha-tocopherol (4, 8 and 16 mg/kg), nifedipine (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg) and tetracycline (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg), given orally, twice daily for 14 consecutive days from the day after acetic acid injection, dose-dependently promoted the ulcer healing and inhibited the increase in the content of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances in the ulcerated mucosa. These results indicate that quercetin, alpha-tocopherol, nifedipine and tetracycline possess gastric cytoprotective and gastric ulcer healing-promoting actions. In addition, the free radical-scavenging properties of these compounds may be partly related to their anti-ulcer effects.
In this study, we compared the effects of low molecular weight (LMW) chitosan (MW: 25,000-50,000), high molecular weight (HMW) chitosan (MW: 500,000-1000,000) and chitin on ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury and on the healing of acetic acid-induced gastric ulcers in rats. Oral administration of LMW chitosan (250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg) dose-dependently prevented ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury. Repeated oral administration of LMW chitosan (100, 200 and 400 mg/kg twice daily) also dose-dependently accelerated the gastric ulcer healing. However, the effects of HMW chitosan and chitin on the gastric mucosal injury formation and the gastric ulcer healing were less potent than those of LMW chitosan. LMW chitosan (250 and 500 mg/kg, orally) was ineffective in inhibiting gastric acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats, although it had a weak acid-neutralizing action. LMW-chitosan (250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg orally) dose-dependently prevented the decrease in gastric mucus content induced by ethanol. These results indicate that of the three compounds, LMW chitosan has the most potent gastric cytoprotective and ulcer healing-promoting actions. In addition, gastric mucus-increasing action of LMW-chitosan may be, at least in part, related to the anti-ulcer effect of this compound.
Background/Aim: Dysgeusia is one of the adverse events frequently affecting patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Dysgeusia-induced anorexia could decrease patient's quality of life. The present study was designed to determine whether the zinc-containing compound polaprezinc improves chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia. Patients and Methods: The incidence of grade 2 dysgeusia was assessed in 634 patients receiving cancer chemotherapy in outpatient settings during January 2013 and June 2017. Polaprezinc was administered to patients showing grade 2 dysgeusia and the effect was compared with that in patients subjected to followup observation. Results: Grade 2 dysgeusia appeared in 80 patients (12.6%), in whom pancreatic cancer and treatment with fluoropyrimidines were significant risks for dysgeusia. Polaprezinc, when administered to patients with grade 2 dysgeusia, significantly shortened the duration of dysgeusia compared with that in the follow-up observation group. Subgroup analysis indicated that polaprezinc was less effective in patients with pancreatic cancer, those receiving gemcitabine, or those whose age was 65 year-old and over. Conclusion: Chemotherapy-induced dysgeusia occurred with high frequency in patients with pancreatic cancer or in those receiving fluoropyrimidines. Polaprezinc was highly effective in improving the symptom of dysgeusia, except for patients with pancreatic cancer, those receiving gemcitabine and the elderly.Dysgeusia is one of the adverse events that occurs frequently during cancer chemotherapy. The occurrence of dysgeusia 6367 This article is freely accessible online.Correspondence to:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.