Aims The EURO-ENDO registry aimed to study the management and outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis (IE). Methods and results Prospective cohort of 3116 adult patients (2470 from Europe, 646 from non-ESC countries), admitted to 156 hospitals in 40 countries between January 2016 and March 2018 with a diagnosis of IE based on ESC 2015 diagnostic criteria. Clinical, biological, microbiological, and imaging [echocardiography, computed tomography (CT) scan, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT)] data were collected. Infective endocarditis was native (NVE) in 1764 (56.6%) patients, prosthetic (PVIE) in 939 (30.1%), and device-related (CDRIE) in 308 (9.9%). Infective endocarditis was community-acquired in 2046 (65.66%) patients. Microorganisms involved were staphylococci in 1085 (44.1%) patients, oral streptococci in 304 (12.3%), enterococci in 390 (15.8%), and Streptococcus gallolyticus in 162 (6.6%). 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed in 518 (16.6%) patients and presented with cardiac uptake (major criterion) in 222 (42.9%) patients, with a better sensitivity in PVIE (66.8%) than in NVE (28.0%) and CDRIE (16.3%). Embolic events occurred in 20.6% of patients, and were significantly associated with tricuspid or pulmonary IE, presence of a vegetation and Staphylococcus aureus IE. According to ESC guidelines, cardiac surgery was indicated in 2160 (69.3%) patients, but finally performed in only 1596 (73.9%) of them. In-hospital death occurred in 532 (17.1%) patients and was more frequent in PVIE. Independent predictors of mortality were Charlson index, creatinine > 2 mg/dL, congestive heart failure, vegetation length > 10 mm, cerebral complications, abscess, and failure to undertake surgery when indicated. Conclusion Infective endocarditis is still a life-threatening disease with frequent lethal outcome despite profound changes in its clinical, microbiological, imaging, and therapeutic profiles.
It is difficult to say that there is more evidence for cardiac amyloidosis (CA) than for ischemic heart disease. On the other hand, 99 m technetium pyrophosphate ( 99 m Tc-PYP) scintigraphy has been reported to be useful with high sensitivity and specificity, especially in transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis (ATTR) 1,2 Due to the spread of diagnosis using this method, CA, especially wild-type ATTR (ATTRwt) amyloidosis, which has traditionally been considered a rare disease, is more prevalent than previously assumed, and encountered relatively frequently in daily clinical practice. Furthermore, treatment for not only amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, but also ATTR, has also progressed rapidly. Tafamidis, a drug that stabilizes the TTR tetramer and suppresses amyloid fibril formation and tissue deposition, was listed and used in Japan in November 2013 for the treatment of peripheral neuropathy in patients with hereditary (variant) ATTR (ATTRv) amyloidosis. In addition, following the results of the 2018 Transthyretin Amyloidosis Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial (ATTR-ACT), which showed the efficacy of tafamidis for CA, 3 the use of TTR to treat CA was approved in March 2019 in Japan.Needless to say, amyloidosis is a systemic disease, and in Japan, numerous studies have been conducted and medical treatments devised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)'s "Research Group on Amyloidosis", a research project on intractable disease policy. The present guidelines have been developed in coordination between the MHLW's "Research Group on Amyloidosis", the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) and cardiology-related societies, the Japanese Society of Amyloidosis, and the Japanese Society of Hematology. Systemic amyloidosis specified by the MHLW as being an incurable disease is classified into the following four types.
Quantitative PET with 15 O provides absolute values for cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO 2 ), and oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), which are used for assessment of brain pathophysiology. Absolute quantification relies on physically accurate measurement, which, thus far, has been achieved by 2-dimensional PET (2D PET), the current gold standard for measurement of CBF and oxygen metabolism. We investigated whether quantitative 15 O study with 3-dimensional PET (3D PET) shows the same degree of accuracy as 2D PET. Methods: 2D PET and 3D PET measurements were obtained on the same day on 8 healthy men (age, 21-24 y). 2D PET was performed using a PET scanner with bismuth germanate (BGO) detectors and a 150-mm axial field of view (FOV). For 3D PET, a 3D-only tomograph with gadolinium oxyorthosilicate (GSO) detectors and a 156-mm axial FOV was used. A hybrid scatter-correction method based on acquisition in the dual-energy window (hybrid dual-energy window [HDE] method) was applied in the 3D PET study. Each PET study included 3 sequential PET scans for C 15 O, 15 O 2 , and H 2 15 O (3-step method). The inhaled (or injected) dose for 3D PET was approximately one fourth of that for 2D PET. Results: In the 2D PET study, average gray matter values (mean 6 SD) of CBF, CBV, CMRO 2 , and OEF were 53 6 12 (mL/100 mL/min), 3.6 6 0.3 (mL/100 mL), 3.5 6 0.5 (mL/100 mL/min), and 0.35 6 0.06, respectively. In the 3D PET study, scatter correction strongly affected the results. Without scatter correction, average values were 44 6 6 (mL/100 mL/min), 5.2 6 0.6 (mL/100 mL), 3.3 6 0.4 (mL/100 mL/min), and 0.39 6 0.05, respectively. With the exception of OEF, values differed between 2D PET and 3D PET. However, average gray matter values of scatter-corrected 3D PET were comparable to those of 2D PET: 55 6 11 (mL/100 mL/min), 3.7 6 0.5 (mL/100 mL), 3.8 6 0.7 (mL/100 mL/min), and 0.36 6 0.06, respectively. Even though the 2 PET scanners with different crystal materials, data acquisition systems, spatial resolution, and attenuation-correction methods were used, the agreement of the results between 2D PET and scatter-corrected 3D PET was excellent. Conclusion: Scatter coincidence is a problem in 3D PET for quantitative 15 O study. The combination of both the present PET/CT device and the HDE scatter correction permits quantitative 3D PET with the same degree of accuracy as 2D PET and with a lower radiation dose. The present scanner is also applicable to conventional steady-state 15 O gas inhalation if inhaled doses are adjusted appropriately.
Aim:Severe gastrointestinal bleeding sometimes occurs in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), known as Heyde's syndrome. This syndrome is thought to be caused by acquired von Willebrand syndrome and is characterized by reduced large von Willebrand factor (vWF) multimers. However, the relationship between the severity of AS and loss of large vWF multimers is unclear. Methods: We examined 31 consecutive patients with severe AS. Quantitative evaluation for loss of large vWF multimers was performed using the conventional large vWF ratio and novel large vWF multimer index. This novel index was defined as the ratio of large multimers of patients to those of controls. Results: Loss of large vWF multimers, defined as the large vWF multimer index 80%, was detected in 21 patients (67.7%). The large vWF multimer ratio and the large vWF multimer index were inversely correlated with the peak aortic gradient (R 0.58, p 0.0007, and R 0.64, p 0.0001, respectively). Anemia defined as hemoglobin 9.0 g/dl was observed in 12 patients (38.7%), who were regarded as Heyde's syndrome. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 7 of these patients, resulting in the improvement of anemia in all patients from a hemoglobin concentration of 7.5 1.0 g/dl preoperatively to 12.4 1.3 g/dl postoperatively (p 0.0001). Conclusions: Acquired von Willebrand syndrome may be a differential diagnosis in patients with AS with anemia. The prevalence of AS-associated acquired von Willebrand syndrome is higher than anticipated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.