Numerous drugs with different mechanisms of action and different pharmacologic profiles are being used with the aim of improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therapeutic options for patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are limited because a reduced glomerular filtration rate results in the accumulation of certain drugs and/or their metabolites. Conventional oral hypoglycemic agents, such as sulfonylurea (SU), are not suitable due to the risk of prolonged hypoglycemia; furthermore, metformin is contraindicated for moderate to advanced CKD. Therefore, in order to achieve good glycemic control, insulin injection therapy remains the mainstay of treatment in diabetic patients with moderate to advanced CKD, particularly in those receiving dialysis therapy. However, some agents have been used even in patients with CKD. Repaglinide and mitiglinide are rapid- and short-acting insulinotropic SU receptor ligands. They are rarely accompanied by hypoglycemia, and are attractive therapeutic options even in the dialysis population. In addition, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors are rarely accompanied by hypoglycemia and are administered without dose adjustments in dialysis patients. However, the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines recommended that alpha-glucosidase inhibitors should be avoided in patients with advanced stage CKD and on dialysis. Furthermore, mitiglinide is not currently used in the US. Thus, recommended oral antidiabetic agents differ between countries. Moreover, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and incretin mimetics are new antihyperglycemic agents, which may be used more frequently in the future in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. Here, we describe the pharmacokinetics, metabolism, clinical efficacy, and safety of oral Antidiabetic agents for patients with CKD, including those receiving dialysis.

In patients with diabetes receiving chronic haemodialysis, both very high and low glucose levels are associated with poor outcomes, including mortality. Conditions that are associated with an increased risk of hypoglycaemia in these patients include decreased gluconeogenesis in the remnant kidneys, deranged metabolic pathways, inadequate nutrition, decreased insulin clearance, glucose loss to the dialysate and diffusion of glucose into erythrocytes during haemodialysis. Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia is common during treatments with glucose-free dialysate, which engenders a catabolic status similar to fasting; this state can also occur with 5.55 mmol/l glucose-containing dialysate. Haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia occurs more frequently in patients with diabetes than in those without. Insulin therapy and oral hypoglycaemic agents should, therefore, be used with caution in patients on dialysis. Several hours after completion of haemodialysis treatment a paradoxical rebound hyperglycaemia may occur via a similar mechanism as the Somogyi effect, together with insulin resistance. Appropriate glycaemic control tailored for patients on haemodialysis is needed to avoid haemodialysis-induced hypoglycaemia and other glycaemic disarrays. In this Review we summarize the pathophysiology and current management of glycaemic disarrays in patients on haemodialysis.

The annual survey of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Renal Data Registry (JRDR) was sent to 4458 dialysis facilities at the end of 2018; among these facilities, 4402 facilities (98.7%) responded to the facility questionnaire, and 4222 (94.7%) responded to the patient questionnaire. The number of chronic dialysis patients in Japan continues to increase every year; as of the end of 2018, it had reached 339,841 patients, representing 2688 patients per million population. Among the prevalent dialysis patients, the mean age was 68.75 years, and diabetic nephropathy was the most common primary disease among the prevalent dialysis patients (39.0%), followed by chronic glomerulonephritis (26.8%) and nephrosclerosis (10.8%). The number of incident dialysis patients was 40, 468, and a reduction by 491 from 2017. The mean age of the incident dialysis patients was 69.99 years old. Diabetic nephropathy was also the most common primary disease (42.3%), representing a 0.2 percent point reduction from 2017. The distribution of diabetic nephropathy appears to have reached a plateau. The number of deceased patients during 2018 was 33,863, and the crude annual death rate was 10.0%. Heart failure was the most common cause of death (23.5%), followed by infection (21.3%) and malignant tumor (8.4%); these causes were similar to

No abstract

Numerous drugs with different mechanisms of action are currently in use with the aim of improving glycemic control, and drugs with different pharmacologic profiles are employed in the management of type 2 diabetes. Therapeutic options for patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are, however, limited because the reduced glomerular filtration rate results in the accumulation of certain drugs and/ or their metabolites [1]. Conventional oral hypoglyce- Abstract. The potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes through incretin hormone-mediated increases in both α-and β-cell responsiveness to glucose. We conducted a prospective, open-label, parallel group, controlled study of 51 patients with type 2 diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) during the 24-week study period. Patients were assigned to two groups: the vildagliptin group (n = 30) and the control group (n = 21). Vildagliptin was administered at 50 mg/day for the first 8 weeks. Then doses were titrated by dose-doubling to a maximum of 100 mg/day if hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or glycated albumin (GA) target levels had not been reached. No vildagliptin was administered to the controls. The average final dose of vildagliptin was 80 ± 5 mg daily. After 24 weeks, vildagliptin had decreased average HbA1c levels from 6.7 % baseline to 6.1 %, average GA levels from 24.5 % baseline to 20.5 % and average postprandial plasma glucose levels from 186 mg/dL baseline to 140 mg/dL (all p < 0.0001). In the control group, we observed no such changes. Vildagliptin efficacy did not differ according to age or body mass index, but the GA reduction was significantly greater in the anti-diabetic agents-naïve group. Furthermore, in patients with higher baseline GA levels, a higher vildagliptin dosage was required to produce a noticeable effect. No serious adverse effects such as hypoglycemia or liver impairment were observed in any patient. Vildagliptin was effective as a treatment for diabetic patients undergoing HD.

Background: We evaluated the erythropoietic effects of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, in type 2 diabetes patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease.Methods: Nine diabetes patients were enrolled and administered 100 mg canagliflozin once a day for 12 weeks. The patients received fixed doses of conventional antidiabetic drugs and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors for 8 weeks before enrollment; these drugs were continued during the study. Endpoints were changes in erythropoiesis parameters, including erythrocyte and reticulocyte count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and serum erythropoietin (EPO) concentration from baseline to 12 weeks. All variables were measured every 2 weeks.Results: Serum EPO concentration increased by 38 [15–62]% (P = 0.043) between baseline and 2 and 4 weeks. Reticulocyte count transiently increased at 2 weeks. Erythropoiesis occurred after 2 weeks of canagliflozin treatment. Erythrocyte count (from 386 ± 36 × 104/μL to 421 ± 36 × 104/μL; P = 0.0009), hemoglobin (from 11.8 ± 0.6 g/dL to 12.9 ± 1.1 g/dL; P = 0.0049), and hematocrit (from 37.1 ± 2.3% to 40.4 ± 3.2%; P = 0.002) increased from baseline to study completion. Although there were no significant changes in transferrin saturation, serum ferritin levels were decreased (P = 0.003).Conclusions: Canagliflozin treatment led to an improvement in erythropoiesis in patients with impaired kidney function. The effect on erythropoiesis appeared to be due to an EPO production-mediated mechanism and might be independent of glycemic control; however, further studies are needed to clarify this since the present study had a small sample size and no comparator group.

Aim:We aimed to assess the effects of rosuvastatin treatment on lipid levels, a biomarker of oxidative stress, albuminuria, and kidney function in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Methods: We conducted a prospective, open-label, parallel group, controlled study of 104 patients with diabetic nephropathy, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of 120 mg/dL, and well-controlled blood pressure who were undergoing treatment with renin angiotensin system inhibitors. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the rosuvastatin group (n 52; 2.5 mg/day rosuvastatin, increased to 10 mg/day) and the control group (n 52; no rosuvastatin administered). We determined the efficacy of rosuvastatin by monitoring serum lipid profiles, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL), and cystatin C levels. In addition, urinary albumin, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) levels were measured before and 6 months after rosuvastatin was added to the treatment. Results: Rosuvastatin effectively reduced total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglycerides, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels, and the LDL-C/ HDL-C ratio in the rosuvastatin group. These parameters remained unchanged in patients who were not treated with rosuvastatin. Although there was no significant change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate level, serum cystatin C levels and urinary albumin excretion rates were significantly decreased in the rosuvastatin group. In addition, rosuvastatin significantly reduced hs-CRP and MDA-LDL levels. Moreover, urinary 8-OHdG and L-FABP levels at baseline (13.5 5.1 and 41.7 26.1 ng/mgCr, respectively) decreased significantly at 6 months (11.5 4.0 and 26.9 13.4 ng/mgCr, respectively), and there was a significant correlation (r 0.48, p 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that albuminuria was significantly correlated with only rosuvastatin use (p 0.0006, R 2 0.53). Conclusion: Rosuvastatin administration reduced albuminuria, oxidative stress, and serum cystatin C levels, independent of blood pressure and lipid levels.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the alteration in plasma immunoreactive insulin (IRI) and glucose concentrations due to hemodialysis (HD) treatment by using a dialysate with or without glucose in HD patients. We divided the patients into three groups: non-diabetic patients (n-DM group), well-controlled diabetic patients (HbA(1c) <7.0% [w-DM group]), and poorly-controlled diabetic patients (HbA(1c) > or = 7.0% [p-DM group]). Using a dialysate with a glucose concentration of 100 mg/dL (glu(+)-dialysate) and a glucose-free dialysate (glu(-)-dialysate), we studied the daily profiles of plasma glucose in the three groups. We measured the levels of plasma glucose and IRI at three time points (predialysis and 2 h and 4 h after the initiation of dialysis) at pre(A) and postdialyzer (V) sites in HD patients. There was a significant increase in the daily profiles of the plasma glucose level from the time before dinner until bedtime in both the w-DM and p-DM groups, when comparing the values on an HD day with those on a non-HD day. In the p-DM group, the use of the glu(-)-dialysate resulted in a significant hyperglycemia in the evening hours when compared with the use of the glu(+)-dialysate. In the DM group, the use of the glu(+)-dialysate resulted in a significant decrease in the plasma glucose and IRI levels during HD. However, in the n-DM group, there was no difference in the plasma glucose levels during HD. On the other hand, the use of a glucose-free dialysate led to a significant decrease in the plasma glucose and IRI levels during HD in all groups. The plasma IRI levels decreased significantly between the A and V sites at each point in all groups irrespective of the glucose concentration of the dialysate. The present study confirmed that the concentration of not only glucose but also IRI had decreased during the passage of the plasma through the dialyzer. In HD patients with diabetes, the glucose content of the hemodialysis solution plays an important role in preventing acute hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia on HD days.