No abstract

Background: Vessel size discrepancy is one of the major risk factors for anastomotic failure in free flap transfer. The situation becomes challenging for reconstructive microsurgeons when the recipient vein is much smaller than the flap vein. We investigated the feasibility of large-to-small end-to-side venous anastomosis for such cases. Materials and methods: The subjects were 16 consecutive patients who underwent a free flap transfer for oncologic defects with a large-to-small end-to-side venous anastomosis. The larger flap vein was anastomosed to the side slit of the smaller recipient vein under an operating microscope. Surgical details and postoperative outcome were investigated retrospectively. Results: An anterolateral thigh flap was used in five patients, a superficial inferior epigastric artery flap in four, a thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in three, and a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap and a fibular osteocutaneous flap in two patients each. The internal mammary vein and the anterior tibial vein were most frequently used as a recipient vein (four patients each), followed by the deep inferior epigastric vein (three patients). The extent of vessel size discrepancy ranged from 1.3-to 3.3-fold, and the mean discrepancy was 1.9-fold. No anastomotic failure occurred postoperatively, and the flap survived in all patients. Conclusions: Large-to-small end-to-side venous anastomosis can be a versatile option when only a small vein is available as a recipient vein. Internal mammary, deep inferior epigastric, and anterior tibial veins are good candidates for this technique.

No abstract

No abstract

The type of back flap harvest used significantly affected drainage duration and seroma formation rate in the present study. Lumbar fat extension with the use of a LDMC flap for breast reconstruction may lead to seroma formation. Thoracodorsal artery perforator flaps are associated with minimal risks of seroma formation and significantly shortened drainage duration compared with LDMC flaps.

The selection of recipient vessels in head and neck reconstruction is one of the key factors influencing its difficulty and outcome. We report a case of a microsurgical scalp reconstruction using the zygomatico-orbital artery as a recipient vessel.A 71-year-old woman had intractable skin ulcers on her head after neurosurgeries. Computed tomography angiography findings showed that the superficial temporal artery was obstructed and that the zygomatico-orbital artery ran forward and upward. She underwent scalp reconstruction using a free anterior lateral thigh flap. The zygomatico-orbital artery was dissected distally, cut, and turned over cranially. The diameter of the zygomatico-orbital artery was 1.2 mm. The blood flow through the zygomatico-orbital artery was sufficient. The thinned scalp area was excised, and some of the titanium devices and infectious tissues were removed. An anterior lateral thigh flap measuring 20 × 9 cm was harvested and transferred to the defect in the head. The discrepancy in calibers was within double, and the zygomatico-orbital artery fit the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. The flap was transferred successfully.The zygomatico-orbital artery is one of the branches from the external carotid artery and supports the suprazygomatic territory. The zygomatico-orbital artery is present in 78% to 92% of people and originates from the superficial temporal artery and sometimes from the frontal branch of superficial temporal artery. The mean diameter of the zygomatico-orbital artery at origin is reported to be 1.20 mm. The zygomatico-orbital artery is another option as a recipient vessel in head and neck reconstruction.

Background Historically, conventional musculocutaneous flaps have been commonly used for reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection, and the use of lower abdominal perforator flaps has not been popular. This report examined the current role of lower abdominal perforator flaps in sarcoma treatment. Methods We reviewed the outcomes of 14 patients (mean age: 46.3 years, range: 18–79 years) who underwent immediate reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap or a superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap after sarcoma resection. The defects ranged in size from 7 × 6 cm2 to 25 × 22 cm2 (mean: 16.5 × 12.1 cm2). An oblique design was used for pedicled DIEP flaps and a transverse design for free DIEP flaps. Results Free SIEA flaps were used in six patients, pedicled DIEP flaps in five, and free DIEP flaps in three. The flaps ranged in size from 13 × 8 cm2 to 36 × 12.5 cm2 (mean: 23.1 × 9.2 cm2). All DIEP flaps except one were harvested based on one dominant perforator. All flaps survived without vascular compromise. Surgical site infection and seroma occurred at the recipient site in one patient each. No donor‐site complications occurred. Conclusions Lower abdominal perforator flaps can serve as a versatile donor site for reconstruction after sarcoma resection.

Free flaps have rarely been used to reconstruct lumbosacral defects, primarily because of the lack of suitable recipient vessels in this region. We propose the novel use of the superior rectal artery as a recipient vessel for free flap transfer after partial or total sacrectomy. We transferred free flow-through latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps, with the superior rectal vessels as recipient vessels, to reconstruct defects after partial sacrectomy in 2 patients with sacral chordoma. The flaps survived completely, and the wounds healed uneventfully in both patients. The superior rectal artery is easier to dissect and anastomose than are gluteal vessels and is less affected by patients' postoperative postural change than are extraperitoneal vessels. We believe that the superior rectal artery is a versatile recipient vessel for free flap transfer to reconstruct sacrectomy defects.