No abstract

Background: Throwing injuries of the shoulder and elbow are common among youth baseball players. Hypothesis: A prevention program will reduce the incidence of throwing injuries of the shoulder and elbow by 50% among youth baseball players. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: The authors block randomized 16 youth baseball teams consisting of 237 players aged 9 to 11 years into an intervention group (8 teams, 117 players) and a control group (8 teams, 120 players). The intervention program consisted of 5 stretching, 2 dynamic mobility, and 2 balance training exercises performed during warm-up. Both groups were followed up for 12 months, during which the incidence of shoulder and elbow injuries was recorded. In addition, ball speed during pitching as a performance-related factor and variables of physical function (passive range of motion of the elbow, shoulder and hip, dynamic balance, and thoracic kyphosis angle) were assessed during the pre- and postintervention periods. Results: The incidence of shoulder and elbow injuries in the intervention group (1.7 per 1000 athlete-exposures) was significantly lower than that in the control group (3.1 per 1000 athlete-exposures) (hazard ratio, 1.940; 95% CI, 1.175-3.205; P = .010). The factors related to pitching performance, as assessed by ball speed, tended to increase in the intervention group as compared with the control group ( P = .010). The program also improved shoulder horizontal adduction deficits on the dominant side, hip internal rotation on the nondominant side, and the thoracic kyphosis angle. Conclusion: A prevention program decreases throwing injuries of the shoulder and elbow and enhances the parameter of pitching performance in youth baseball players.

The critical level of anterior glenoid bone loss at which bony restorations should be considered is closer to 15% of the largest anteroposterior width of glenoid for defects perpendicular to the superoinferior glenoid axis, which is lower than the commonly accepted threshold of 20% to 25%.

Objectives:The objective of the study was to create a cadaveric model of hip capsule laxity and evaluate the biomechanical effects of a capsular shift used to treat hip instability on this model.Methods:Eight fresh frozen cadaveric hips, average age 58.5, were tested with a custom hip jig. To create the hip laxity model, the capsule was stretched in extension under 35Nm of torque for 1 hour in neutral rotation. Specimens went through a series of six testing conditions: intact, vented, stretched, capsulotomy, side to side repair, and capsular shift. Specimens were tested in internal (IR) and external (ER) rotational range of motion under 1.5 Nm of torque at 5 positions: 5° extension, 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° flexion. Maximum extension was measured at 5Nm torque, and femoral distraction under 40N and 80N of force. Following creation of the instability model, capsulotomy was performed just distal to and in line with the labrum from 12 o’clock to 4 o’clock through the entire substance of the iliofemoral ligament. Capsulotomies underwent two repairs, including a 1 cm capsular shift technique and side to side repair using #2 vicryl. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA with TUKEY post-hoc analysis.Results:Analysis of the “stretched” state showed significantly increased IR at 5° ext, 0° flex, 15° flex, and 30° flex and increased distraction at 40N and 80N as compared to intact (Figure 1)(Table 1). Max extension increased by 6.6° between intact and stretched, however this was not statistically significant. Capsulotomy condition significantly increased ER and IR from intact at all flexion-extension positions. Furthermore, capsulotomy increased distraction at 40N and 80N, as well as max extension, as compared to intact. The repair restored IR back to the stretched state but not to the intact state at 5° ext and 0° flex (19.6° vs 24.5° and 21.8° vs 26.4°, respectively). The capsular shift significantly decreased IR compared to stretched state at 5° ext, 0°, and 15° flex, and at 5° ext and 0° compared to the vented state. Capsular shift restricted IR significantly more than repair at 5° ext, 0° flex, and 15° flex. Capsule shift and repair had similar effects on ER. Distraction distance at 40N and 80N was greater in the repair compared to the shift but this was not statistically significant. The capsular shift decreased distraction as compared to the stretched state but the repair did not. Maximum extension was significantly reduced back to the intact/vented state from the laxity state in the capsular shift but not in the repair.Conclusion:The instability model (stretched) was shown to have significantly greater range of motion, extension, and distraction than the intact condition. The greatest effects of capsular shift are seen with internal rotation, extension, and distraction with minimal effect on external rotation. The biomechanical effects of the capsular shift procedure in hip laxity patients show that its use can safely treat pathologic hip capsular laxity.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The biomechanical effects of the capsular shift procedure indicate that it can be used to treat hip capsular laxity by decreasing extension and distraction with minimal effect on external rotation.