The forkhead box O (FOXO) proteins are transcription factors involved in the differentiation of many cell types. Type II collagen (Col2) Cre-Foxo1-knockout and Col2-Cre-Foxo1,3,4 triple-knockout mice exhibit growth plate malformation. Moreover, recent studies have reported that in some cells, the expressions and activities of FOXOs are promoted by transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1), a growth factor playing a key role in chondrogenic differentiation. Here, using a murine chondrogenic cell line (ATDC5), mouse embryos, and human mesenchymal stem cells, we report the mechanisms by which FOXOs affect chondrogenic differentiation. FOXO1 expression increased along with chondrogenic differentiation, and FOXO1 inhibition suppressed chondrogenic differentiation. TGFβ1/SMAD signaling promoted expression and activity of FOXO1. In ATDC5, FOXO1 knockdown suppressed expression of sex-determining region Y box 9 (Sox9), a master regulator of chondrogenic differentiation, resulting in decreased collagen type II α1 (Col2a1) and aggrecan (Acan) expression after TGFβ1 treatment. On the other hand, chemical FOXO1 inhibition suppressed Col2a1 and Acan expression without suppressing Sox9. To investigate the effects of FOXO1 on chondrogenic differentiation independently of SOX9, we examined FOXO1's effects on the cell cycle. FOXO1 inhibition suppressed expression of p21 and cell-cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase. Conversely, FOXO1 overexpression promoted expression of p21 and cell-cycle arrest. FOXO1 inhibition suppressed expression of nascent p21 RNA by TGFβ1, and FOXO1 bound the p21 promoter. p21 inhibition suppressed expression of Col2a1 and Acan during chondrogenic differentiation. These results suggest that FOXO1 is necessary for not only SOX9 expression, but also cell-cycle arrest during chondrogenic differentiation via TGFβ1 signaling.

Objective NF‐κB–dependent signaling is an important modulator in osteoarthritis (OA), and G protein–coupled receptor kinase 5 (GRK5) regulates the NF‐κB pathway. This study was undertaken to investigate the functional involvement of GRK5 in OA pathogenesis. Methods GRK5 expression in normal and OA human knee joints was analyzed immunohistochemically. Gain‐ or loss‐of‐function experiments were performed using human and mouse chondrocytes. OA was induced in GRK5‐knockout mice by destabilization of the medial meniscus, and histologic examination was performed. OA was also induced in wild‐type mice, which were then treated with an intraarticular injection of amlexanox, a selective GRK5 inhibitor, every 5 days for 8 weeks. Results GRK5 protein expression was increased in human OA cartilage. In vitro, expression levels of OA‐related factors and NF‐κB transcriptional activation were down‐regulated by suppression of the GRK5 gene in human OA chondrocytes (3.49‐fold decrease in IL6 [P < 0.01], 2.43‐fold decrease in MMP13 [P < 0.01], and 2.66‐fold decrease in ADAMTS4 [P < 0.01]). Conversely, GRK5 overexpression significantly increased the expression of OA‐related catabolic mediators and NF‐κB transcriptional activation. On Western blot analysis, GRK5 deletion reduced IκBα phosphorylation (up to 4.4‐fold decrease [P < 0.05]) and decreased p65 nuclear translocation (up to 6.4‐fold decrease [P < 0.01]) in mouse chondrocytes. In vivo, both GRK5 deletion and intraarticular amlexanox protected mouse cartilage against OA. Conclusion Our results suggest that GRK5 regulates cartilage degradation through a catabolic response mediated by NF‐κB signaling, and is a potential target for OA treatment. Furthermore, amlexanox may be a major compound in relevant drugs.

Aging of the global population increases the incidence of osteoporosis and associated fragility fractures, significantly impacting patient quality of life and healthcare costs. The acute inflammatory reaction is essential to initiate healing after injury. However, aging is associated with “inflammaging”, referring to the presence of systemic low-level chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation impairs the initiation of bone regeneration in elderly patients. This review examines current knowledge of the bone regeneration process and potential immunomodulatory therapies to facilitate bone healing in inflammaging.Aged macrophages show increased sensitivity and responsiveness to inflammatory signals. While M1 macrophages are activated during the acute inflammatory response, proper resolution of the inflammatory phase involves repolarizing pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages to an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype associated with tissue regeneration. In aging, persistent chronic inflammation resulting from the failure of M1 to M2 repolarization leads to increased osteoclast activation and decreased osteoblast formation, thus increasing bone resorption and decreasing bone formation during healing.Inflammaging can impair the ability of stem cells to support bone regeneration and contributes to the decline in bone mass and strength that occurs with aging. Therefore, modulating inflammaging is a promising approach for improving bone health in the aging population. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) possess immunomodulatory properties that may benefit bone regeneration in inflammation. Preconditioning MSCs with pro-inflammatory cytokines affects MSCs’ secretory profile and osteogenic ability. MSCs cultured under hypoxic conditions show increased proliferation rates and secretion of growth factors. Resolution of inflammation via local delivery of anti-inflammatory cytokines is also a potential therapy for bone regeneration in inflammaging. Scaffolds containing anti-inflammatory cytokines, unaltered MSCs, and genetically modified MSCs can also have therapeutic potential. MSC exosomes can increase the migration of MSCs to the fracture site and enhance osteogenic differentiation and angiogenesis.In conclusion, inflammaging can impair the proper initiation of bone regeneration in the elderly. Modulating inflammaging is a promising approach for improving compromised bone healing in the aging population.

No abstract

Background Despite the high incidence of fractures and pseudoarthrosis in the aged population, a potential role for the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the treatment of bone defects in elderly patients has not been elucidated. Inflammation and the innate immune system, including macrophages, play crucial roles in the differentiation and activation of MSCs. We have developed lentivirus-transduced interleukin 4 (IL4) over-expressing MSCs (IL4-MSCs) to polarize macrophages to an M2 phenotype to promote bone healing in an established young murine critical size bone defect model. In the current study, we explore the potential of IL4-MSCs in aged mice. Methods A 2 mm femoral diaphyseal bone defect was created and fixed with an external fixation device in 15- to 17-month-old male and female BALB/c mice. Microribbon (µRB) scaffolds (Sc) with or without encapsulation of MSCs were implanted in the defect sites. Accordingly, the mice were divided into three treatment groups: Sc-only, Sc + MSCs, and Sc + IL4-MSCs. Mice were euthanized six weeks after the surgery; subsequently, MicroCT (µCT), histochemical and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. Results µCT analysis revealed that bone formation was markedly enhanced in the IL4-MSC group. Compared with the Sc-only, the amount of new bone increased in the Sc + MSCs and Sc + IL4-MSC groups. However, no bridging of bone was observed in all groups. H&E staining showed fibrous tissue within the defect in all groups. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining was increased in the Sc + IL4-MSC group. The Sc + IL4-MSCs group showed a decrease in the number of M1 macrophages and an increase in the number of M2 macrophages, with a significant increase in the M2/M1 ratio. Discussion IL4 promotes macrophage polarization to an M2 phenotype, facilitating osteogenesis and vasculogenesis. The addition of IL4-MSCs in the µRB scaffold polarized macrophages to an M2 phenotype and increased bone formation; however, complete bone bridging was not observed in any specimens. These results suggest that IL4-MSCs are insufficient to heal a critical size bone defect in aged mice, as opposed to younger animals. Additional therapeutic strategies are needed in this challenging clinical scenario.