Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has recently revealed that the transitions between the parietal operculum (Pop) and the insula (area G) and the ventral end of the central sulcus (cs) were activated with the shortest latency by instrumental gustatory stimulation, which suggests that the location of the primary gustatory area is in these two regions. However, studies using other noninvasive brain-imaging methods such as positron-emission tomography or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with manual application of tastants into the mouth have been unable to confirm this. The present study examined cortical activation by repetitive stimulation of the tongue tip with 1 M NaCl with a computer-controlled stimulator and used fMRI to detect it. In individual brains, activations were detected with multiple comparisons (false discovery rate) across the whole brain corrected (threshold at P < 0.05) at both area G and frontal operculum (Fop) in 8 of 11 subjects and at the rolandic operculum (Rop) in 7 subjects. Activations were also found at the ventral end of the cs (n = 3). Group analysis with random-effect models (multiple comparison using familywise error in regions of interest, P < 0.02) revealed activation at area G in both hemispheres and in the Fop, Rop, and ventral end of the cs on the left side. The present study revealed no activation on the gyrus of the external cerebral surface except for the Rop. Taking MEG findings into consideration, the present findings strongly indicate that the primary gustatory area is present at both the transition between the Pop and insula and the Rop including the gray matter within a ventral part of the cs.

Key points• Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) blocks synaptic transmission via the cleavage of SNAP-25.Axonal transport of BoNT/A (A1 type botulinum toxin (A1LL) and A2 type botulinum toxin (A2NTX)) from periphery to the CNS has been described in trigeminal nerve and foreleg muscles.• A1LL and A2NTX were injected into the ipsilateral soleus, and their effects on ipsilateral and contralateral contractions were compared as a measure of local and systemic/transport-mediated effects. Spinal transmission was also measured to determine axonal and transsynaptic transport of neurotoxin.• A2NTX induced faster and stronger muscle relaxation than A1LL. A1LL arrived at the contralateral muscle by almost equal transport via neural pathways and by the circulation.• A2NTX was mainly transported to contralateral muscles via the blood.• A1LL and A2NTX were carried from peripheral to CNS and vice versa by dual antero-and retrograde axonal transport through either motor or sensory neurons.• Our results may point to greater potential safety in A2NTX form.Abstract Type A botulinum toxin blocks not only ACh release from motor nerve terminals but also central synaptic transmission, including glutamate, noradrenaline, dopamine, ATP, GABA and glycine. Neurotoxins (NTXs) are transported by both antero-and retrogradely along either motor or sensory axons for bidirectional delivery between peripheral tissues or the CNS. A newly developed type A2 NTX (A2NTX) injected into one rat foreleg muscle was transported to the contralateral muscle. This finding was consistent with the NTX traveling retrogradely via spinal neurons and then transsynaptically through motor neurons to the contralateral motor neurons within the spinal cord and on to the soleus muscle. In the present study we found that toxin injection into the rat left soleus muscle clearly induced bilateral muscle relaxation in a dose-dependent fashion, although the contralateral muscle relaxation followed the complete inhibition of toxin-injected ipsilateral muscles. The toxin-injected ipsilateral muscle relaxation was faster and stronger in A2NTX-treated rats than A1LL (BOTOX). A1LL was transported almost equally to the contralateral muscle via neural pathways and the bloodstream. In contrast, A2NTX was mainly transported to contralateral muscles via the blood. A1LL was more successfully transported to contralateral spinal neurons than A2NTX. We also demonstrated that A1LL and A2NTX were carried from peripheral to CNS and vice versa by dual antero-and retrograde axonal transport through either motor or sensory neurons.

Background5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) is one of the major neurotransmitters widely distributed in the CNS. Several 5-HT receptor subtypes have been identified in the spinal dorsal horn which act on both pre- and postsynaptic sites of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. However, the receptor subtypes and sites of actions as well as underlying mechanism are not clarified rigorously. Several electrophysiological studies have been performed to investigate the effects of 5-HT on excitatory transmission in substantia gelatinosa (SG) of the spinal cord. In the present study, to understand the effects of 5-HT on the inhibitory synaptic transmission and to identify receptor subtypes, the blind whole cell recordings were performed from SG neurons of rat spinal cord slices.ResultsBath applied 5-HT (50 μM) increased the frequency but not amplitudes of spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) in 58% of neurons, and both amplitude and frequency in 23% of neurons. The frequencies of GABAergic and glycinergic mIPSCs were both enhanced. TTX (0.5 μM) had no effect on the increasing frequency, while the enhancement of amplitude of IPSCs was eliminated. Evoked-IPSCs (eIPSCs) induced by focal stimulation near the recording neurons in the presence of CNQX and APV were enhanced in amplitude by 5-HT. In the presence of Ba2+ (1 mM), a potassium channel blocker, 5-HT had no effect on both frequency and amplitude. A 5-HT2A receptor agonist, TCB-2 mimicked the 5-HT effect, and ketanserin, an antagonist of 5-HT2A receptor, inhibited the effect of 5-HT partially and TCB-2 almost completely. A 5-HT2C receptor agonist WAY 161503 mimicked the 5-HT effect and this effect was blocked by a 5-HT2C receptor antagonist, N-desmethylclozapine. The amplitudes of sIPSCs were unaffected by 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C agonists. A 5-HT3 receptor agonist mCPBG enhanced both amplitude and frequency of sIPSCs. This effect was blocked by a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ICS-205,930. The perfusion of 5-HT2B receptor agonist had no effect on sIPSCs.ConclusionsOur results demonstrated that 5-HT modulated the inhibitory transmission in SG by the activation of 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors subtypes located predominantly at inhibitory interneuron terminals, and 5-HT3 receptors located at inhibitory interneuron terminals and soma-dendrites, consequently enhanced both frequency and amplitude of IPSCs.

No abstract

Ethanol (EtOH) has a number of behavioral effects, including intoxication, amnesia, and/or sedation, that are thought to relate to the activation of GABA A receptors. However, GABA A receptors at different cellular locations have different sensitivities to EtOH. The present study used the "synaptic bouton" preparation where we could stimulate nerve endings on mechanically dissociated single rat hippocampal CA1 and CA3 pyramidal neurons and investigate the effects of EtOH on presynaptic and postsynaptic GABA A receptors. Low concentrations of EtOH (10 mM) had no effect on postsynaptic GABA A and glutamate receptors or voltage-dependent Na ϩ and Ca 2ϩ channels. Higher concentrations (Ն100 mM) could significantly inhibit these current responses. EtOH at 10 mM had no direct effect on inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) and excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) evoked by focal stimulation of single boutons [evoked IPSCs (eIPSCs) and evoked EPSCs (eEPSCs)]. However, coapplication of 10 mM EtOH with muscimol decreased the amplitude of eIPSCs and eEPSCs and increased their paired-pulse ratio. The effects on eEPSCs were reversed by bicuculline. Coapplication of muscimol and EtOH significantly increased the frequency of spontaneous IPSCs and EPSCs. The EtOH effects on the postsynaptic responses and eEPSCs were similar in neurons from neonatal and mature rats. These results revealed that low concentrations of EtOH can potentiate the activation of presynaptic GABA A receptors to inhibit evoked GABA and glutamate release. These results indicate a high sensitivity of presynaptic GABA A receptor to EtOH, which needs to be accounted for when considering the cellular mechanisms of EtOH's physiological responses.