No abstract

Purpose To investigate the risk factors for post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH). Methods The incidence, outcome, and risk factors for PPH were evaluated in 1169 patients who underwent pancreatectomy. Results The incidence and mortality rates of PPH were 3% and 11% in all pancreatectomies, 4% and 11% in pancreatoduodenectomy, 1% and 20% in distal pancreatectomy, and 3% and 0% in total pancreatectomy, respectively. Male sex [odds ratio (OR) 2.32], body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m 2 (OR 3.70), absence of diabetes mellitus (DM; HbA1c ≤ 6.2%; OR 3.62), and pancreatoduodenectomy (OR 3.06) were risk factors for PPH after all pancreatectomies. The PPH incidence was 0%, 1%, 2%, 6%, and 20% in patients with risk scores of 0 (n = 65), 1 (n = 325), 2 (n = 455), 3 (n = 299), and 4 (n = 25), respectively. The differences between risk-score groups 0-2 (2%) and 3-4 (7%) were significant (P < 0.05, OR 4.7). In patients who had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF; OR 31.7) and absence of DM (OR 3.45) were risk factors for PPH. There was no significant association between POPF and PPH after distal pancreatectomy (P = 0.28). The incidence of POPF post-pancreatoduodenectomy was 20%. BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 (OR 3.17), serum albumin < 3.5 g/dl (OR 1.77), absence of DM (OR 1.75), distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (OR 4.05), and carcinoma of the papilla of Vater (OR 5.19) were risk factors for POPF post-pancreatoduodenectomy. Conclusion Our study clarified the preoperative risk factors for PPH and recommends using a risk scoring system that includes Babsence of DM^for predicting PPH.

No abstract

Objectives This study aimed to identify the detailed clinicopathological features of undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas (UCP). Methods We investigated clinical, imaging features and the prognoses of 261 patients; 8 were our patients, and the remainder were identified by searching English-language articles in PubMed. Results We classified patients with UCP into 3 types based on pathological findings: osteoclast-like giant cell–associated carcinoma, pleomorphic cell carcinoma (PLC), and spindle cell carcinoma. There were no remarkable differences in clinical, radiological features between these 3 types. However, PLCs were significantly more likely to be unresectable than were the other 2 types (P < 0.001). Patients with osteoclast-like giant cell–associated carcinoma achieved the best overall survival (OS) rates (P < 0.001), whereas those with spindle cell carcinoma had significantly longer OS rates than did those with PLC (P = 0.004). These OS patterns were maintained when considering only those patients who underwent resection. Patients with PLC had both lower curative resection and high lymph node metastasis rates (P = 0.029, P = 0.023). Patients who underwent resection had more favorable prognoses than did those who did not. Conclusions Surgery is the first choice for resectable UCP. Pleomorphic cell carcinoma is particularly malignant; postoperative treatment should be introduced immediately.