Aksentuasi perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi dewasa ini memberi perubahan mengenai perkembangan masyarakat dan perkembangan subjek tindak pidana. Pada mulanya, subjek tindak pidana hanya mengacu kepada manusia alamiah saja (naturlijke persoon), tetapi pada kenyataannya, sekarang badan hokum (rechts persoon) menjadi subjek tindak pidana. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif, menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute appoach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Data dikumpulkan melalui studi kepustakaan, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Penelitian ini menunjukkan sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi menganut sistem pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi campuran, sehingga pertanggungjawaban pidana diterapkan terhadap korporasi dan/atau pengurusnya.
Prevention of corruption is one of legal reform agendas that has been implemented by the Indonesian government. However, there is a gap in the main objective of the prevention to restore the country’s financial losses. Returning state’s financial losses is not easy. There are needs of a new paradigm to maximize the return of state financial losses caused by corruption. In the United Kingdom, the Serious Fraud Office used the Deferred Prosecution Agreement to handle Rolls-Royce’s alleged corruption offenses. One of the requirements is a legal compliance program that the corporation must obey. This study conducted in a form of a descriptive study. It employed normative juridical research type with statute and conceptual approaches, as well as legal comparison. The data was collected through literature studies before subsequently analyzed qualitatively. The results show that the implementation of the concept of deferred prosecution on corruption crimes committed by corporations with anti-bribery management system (SNI ISO 37001: 2016) is stated in the legislation policy related to the prohibition of corruption crimes committed by corporation. Any corporations can be held criminally accountable. However, policies and regulations in Indonesia do not require corporations to follow the legal compliance program.
Corporations are entities that have a large role in society, there are many positive roles to life, but not a few negative existences of activities that arise, including corruption. The purpose of this article is to analyze the implementation of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with the Anti-Bribery Management System (ABMS) in dealing with Corruption by Corporations in Indonesia. The method used in this article is normative juridical legal research. This article concludes ways to eradicate corrupt acts carried out remarkably, in turn experiencing obstacles in terms of the functioning of criminal law, even it can be said to be counter-productive. This is a concrete step towards the idea of implementing DPA as a restorative approach in the context of tackling corruption acts committed by corporations. By using the Anti-Bribery Management System (ABMS), it is expected that corrective steps will be obtained from the corporation.
Ketidaksinkronan regulasi terkait status keuangan negara di lingkungan BUMN Persero, kenyataannya telah menimbulkan kesulitan untuk menentukan ada atau tidaknya tindak pidana korupsi serta langkah penyelesaian tindak pidana korupsi di lingkungan BUMN Persero. Asas ultimum remedium sebagai asas yang paling fundamental dalam hukum pidana dapat diterapkan terhadap tindak pidana korupsi yang terjadi di lingkungan BUMN Persero dengan menekankan pada penyelesaian melalui hukum perdata dan hukum administrasi. Selanjutnya, sebagai upaya mengatasi ketidaksinkronan regulasi, Kekayaan negara yang dipisahkan dalam BUMN harus diperlakukan sebagai aturan khusus (lex specialis), sehingga berdasar adagium lex specialis derograt legi generale, maka Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 tentang BUMN harus menjadi dasar penyelesaiannya. Kemudian dikaitkan dengan waktu pengundangannya atau pemberlakuannya, undang-undang tersebut diundangkan lebih belakangan, maka berdasar adagium lex posteriori derograt legi priori, undang-undang BUMN dimaksud harus menjadi dasar hukumnya.
At present, Indonesia needs to update the Indonesian Criminal Code to replace the Dutch Colonial Criminal Code that still exists. The jurists, especially criminal law experts, have been involved in a lengthy debate on overhauling, reformulating, revising, and even reforming the Criminal Code to align with Indonesian values. This study aims to determine the foundation of the policy to expand the concept of adultery and the values protected by the expansion contained in Article 411 of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code. This study was a descriptive study that used a normative juridical approach. The data collection techniques employed secondary data with a study of documents. The data were analyzed with qualitative methods. The result shows that the foundation of the expansion policy is the perspective of criminal policy. The formulation of the adultery offense in Article 284 of the Criminal Code is a problematic policy because it is not in accordance with the values of the Indonesian people. The formulation of the article only convicts the offenders who are committed in marriage. The provision does not require punishment to unmarried convicts. The arrangements for adultery offenses that are still in effect today are not based on a view of life. They do not reflect the social structure of the Indonesian people with the characteristics of kinship, groups, and beliefs. On the other hand, Article 411 of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code expands the concept of adultery to protect the religious and moral values closely related to Pancasila.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.