The RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3C-like protease (3CLpro) from SARS-CoV-2 play crucial roles in the viral life cycle and are considered the most promising targets for drug discovery against SARS-CoV-2. In this study, FDA-approved drugs were screened to identify the probable anti-RdRp and 3CLpro inhibitors by molecular docking approach. The number of ligands selected from the PubChem database of NCBI for screening was 1760. Ligands were energy minimized using Open Babel. The RdRp and 3CLpro protein sequences were retrieved from the NCBI database. For Homology Modeling predictions, we used the Swiss model server. Their structure was then energetically minimized using SPDB viewer software and visualized in the CHIMERA UCSF software. Molecular dockings were performed using AutoDock Vina, and candidate drugs were selected based on binding affinity (∆G). Hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions between ligands and proteins were visualized using Ligplot and the Discovery Studio Visualizer v3.0 software. Our results showed 58 drugs against RdRp, which had binding energy of -8.5 or less, and 69 drugs to inhibit the 3CLpro enzyme with a binding energy of -8.1 or less. Six drugs based on binding energy and number of hydrogen bonds were chosen for the next step of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate drug-protein interactions (including Nilotinib, Imatinib and dihydroergotamine for 3clpro and Lapatinib, Dexasone and Relategravir for RdRp). Except for Lapatinib, other drugs-complexes were stable during MD simulation. Raltegravir, an anti-HIV drug, was observed to be the best compound against RdRp based on docking binding energy (-9.5 kcal/mole) and MD results. According to the MD results and binding energy, dihydroergotamine is a suitable candidate for 3clpro inhibition (−9.6 kcal/mol). These drugs were classified into several categories, including antiviral, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic, cardiovascular, anticoagulant, BPH and impotence, antipsychotic, antimigraine, anticancer, and so on. The common prescription-indications for some of these medication categories appeared somewhat in line with manifestations of COVID-19. We hope that they can be beneficial for patients with certain specific symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but they can also probably inhibit viral enzymes. We recommend further experimental evaluations in vitro and in vivo on these FDA-approved drugs to assess their potential antiviral effect on SARS-CoV-2.

After SARS and MERS outbreaks, COVID-19 is the third coronavirus epidemic that soon turned into a pandemic. This virus causes acute respiratory syndrome in infected people. The mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection will probably rise unless efficient treatments or vaccines are developed. The global funding and medical communities have started performing more than five hundred clinical examinations on a broad spectrum of repurposed drugs to acquire effective treatments. Besides, other novel treatment approaches have also recently emerged, including cellular host-directed therapies. They counteract the unwanted responses of the host immune system that led to the severe pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2. This brief review focuses on Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) principles in treating the COVID-19. The US clinical trials database and the world health organization database for clinical trials have reported 82 clinical trials (altogether) exploring the effects of MSCs in COVID-19 treatment. MSCs also had better be tried for treating other pathogens worldwide. MSC treatment may have the potential to end the high mortality rate of COVID-19. Besides, it also limits the long-term inability of survivors.

Backgrounds Polycystic ovary syndrome affects 7% of women of reproductive ages. Poor-quality oocytes, along with lower cleavage and implantation rates, reduce fertilization. Objective This study aimed to determine crucial molecular mechanisms behind PCOS pathogenesis and repurpose new drug candidates interacting with them. To predict a more in-depth insight, we applied a novel bioinformatics approach to analyze interactions between the drug-related and PCOS proteins in PCOS patients. Methods The newest proteomics data was retrieved from 16 proteomics datasets and was used to construct the PCOS PPI network using Cytoscape. The topological network analysis determined hubs and bottlenecks. The MCODE Plugin was used to identify highly connected regions, and the associations between PCOS clusters and drug-related proteins were evaluated using the Chi-squared/Fisher's exact test. The crucial PPI hub-bottlenecks and the shared molecules (between the PCOS clusters and drug-related proteins) were then investigated for their drug-protein interactions with previously US FDA-approved drugs to predict new drug candidates. Results The PI3K/AKT pathway was significantly related to one PCOS subnetwork and most drugs (metformin, letrozole, pioglitazone, and spironolactone); moreover, VEGF, EGF, TGFB1, AGT, AMBP, and RBP4 were identified as the shared proteins between the PCOS subnetwork and the drugs. The shared top biochemical pathways between another PCOS subnetwork and rosiglitazone included metabolic pathways, carbon metabolism, and citrate cycle, while the shared proteins included HSPB1, HSPD1, ACO2, TALDO1, VDAC1, and MDH2. We proposed some new candidate medicines for further PCOS treatment investigations, such as copper and zinc compounds, reteplase, alteplase, gliclazide, Etc. Conclusion Some of the crucial molecules suggested by our model have already been experimentally reported as critical molecules in PCOS pathogenesis. Moreover, some repurposed medications have already shown beneficial effects on infertility treatment. These previous experimental reports confirm our suggestion for investigating our other repurposed drugs (in vitro and in vivo). Graphical abstract Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40199-021-00413-9.

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy worldwide. Doxorubicin is an anthracycline used to treat breast cancer as the first treatment choice. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms underlying the response to Doxorubicin and its side effects are not comprehensively understood so far. We used systems biology and bioinformatics methods to identify essential genes and molecular mechanisms behind the body response to Doxorubicin and its side effects in breast cancer patients. Methods: Omics data were extracted and analyzed to construct the protein-protein interaction and gene regulatory networks. Network analysis was performed to identify hubs, bottlenecks, clusters, and regulatory motifs to evaluate crucial genes and molecular mechanisms behind the body response to Doxorubicin and its side effects. Results: Analyzing the constructed PPI and gene-TF-miRNA regulatory network showed that MCM3, MCM10, and TP53 are key hub-bottlenecks and seed proteins. Enrichment analysis also revealed cell cycle, TP53 signaling, Forkhead box O (FoxO) signaling, and viral carcinogenesis as essential pathways in response to this drug. Besides, SNARE interactions in vesicular transport and neurotrophin signaling were identified as pathways related to the side effects of Doxorubicin. The apoptosis induction, DNA repair, invasion inhibition, metastasis, and DNA replication are suggested as critical molecular mechanisms underlying Doxorubicin anti-cancer effect. SNARE interactions in vesicular transport and neurotrophin signaling and FoxO signaling pathways in glucose metabolism are probably the mechanisms responsible for side effects of Doxorubicin. Conclusion: Following our model validation using the existing experimental data, we recommend our other newly predicted biomarkers and pathways as possible molecular mechanisms and side effects underlying the response to Doxorubicin in breast cancer requiring further investigations.

No abstract

No abstract

: The critical problems of conventional prostate cancer therapeutic strategies like nonspecific toxicity and multi-drug resistance prompted the development and application of countless nanoparticle-based siRNA therapeutics. The main challenges to siRNA-based therapeutics becoming a new paradigm in the treatment of prostate cancer stem from the lack of safe and effective delivery systems, immune system stimulation, poor knowledge of nano-bio interactions, and limitations concerning designing, manufacturing, clinical translation, and commercialization. In this review, we provide cutting-edge advances in nanoparticle-mediated siRNA delivery carriers like polymeric systems, lipid systems, specific systems, and rigid nanoparticles for the treatment of prostate cancer. Moreover, co-delivery of conventional chemotherapy drugs with siRNA as a robust revolutionary strategy for prostate cancer combinational therapy is completely covered.

Background: Uncontrolled mitosis of cancer cells and resistance cells to chemotherapy drugs are the challenges of prostate cancer. Thalicthuberine causes a mitotic arrest and a reduction of the effects of drug resistance, resulting in cell death. In this study, we applied bioinformatics and computational biology methods to identify functional pathways and side effects in response to Thalicthuberine in prostate cancer patients. Methods: Microarray data were retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), and protein-protein interactions and gene regulatory networks were constructed, using the Cytoscape software. The critical genes and molecular mechanisms in response to Thalicthuberine and its side effects were identified, using the Cytoscape software and WebGestalt server, respectively. Finally, GEPIA2 was used to predict the relationship between critical genes and prostate cancer. Results: The POLQ, EGR1, CDKN1A, FOS, MDM2, CDC20, CCNB1, and CCNB2 were identified as critical genes in response to this drug. The functional mechanisms of Thalicthuberine include a response to oxygen levels, toxic substances and immobilization stress, cell cycle regulation, regeneration, the p53 signaling pathway, the action of the parathyroid hormone, and the FoxO signaling pathway. Besides, the drug has side effects including muscle cramping, abdominal pains, paresthesia, and metabolic diseases. Conclusion: Our model suggested newly predicted crucial genes, molecular mechanisms, and possible side effects of this drug. However, further studies are required.